Comparison of Three Different Assisting Devices to Power Manual Wheelchairs in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT02244931

Last Updated: 2014-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare three assisting devices to propel personal wheelchairs (Servomatic A©, Servomatic B© and E.Motion©) to the standard personal manual wheelchair in patients with spinal cord injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of the study is to compare three assisting devices to propel personal wheelchairs (Servomatic A©, Servomatic B© and E.Motion©) to the standard personal manual wheelchair in patients with spinal cord injury.

The study consists of three distinct and independent phases:

* Phase 1: Performance evaluation on wheelchair ergometer in order to compare the energy expenditure and kinetic characteristics in comparable situations with regard to speed and workload imposed to the wheelchair-patient couple.
* Phase 2: Comparison of maneuverability and ease of crossing usual obstacles in outdoor and indoor paths with standardised obstacles. Trajectories are to be recorded in order to allow analysis by independent experts.
* Phase 3: Comparison of the autonomy of patients afforded by the devices by comparing the patient's ability to transfer from wheelchair to car seat and from car seat to wheelchair, as well as ease of wheelchair packing in car, in the context of a standard city transport involving a car and the wheelchair.

The three phases are to be performed using the standard manual wheelchair and the three assisting devices in a randomized order.

Three different groups of patients are included in the three phases of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phase 1: Performance evaluation on ergometer

The 3 devices are experimented in random order to compare them on performance using an ergometer wheelchair:

* Servomatic™ assisting device
* E.Motion© assisting device
* Standard manual Wheelchair

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Servomatic™ assisting device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Servomatic™ is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

E.Motion© assisting device

Intervention Type DEVICE

E.Motion© is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

Standard manual Wheelchair

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard manual Wheelchair

Phase 2: Comparison of maneuverability

The 3 devices are experimented in random order to compare them on maneuverability:

* Servomatic™ assisting device
* E.Motion© assisting device
* Standard manual Wheelchair

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Servomatic™ assisting device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Servomatic™ is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

E.Motion© assisting device

Intervention Type DEVICE

E.Motion© is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

Standard manual Wheelchair

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard manual Wheelchair

Phase 3: Comparison of the autonomy

The 3 devices are experimented in random order to compare them on the autonomy they afford to patients:

* Servomatic™ assisting device
* E.Motion© assisting device
* Standard manual Wheelchair

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Servomatic™ assisting device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Servomatic™ is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

E.Motion© assisting device

Intervention Type DEVICE

E.Motion© is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

Standard manual Wheelchair

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard manual Wheelchair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Servomatic™ assisting device

Servomatic™ is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

Intervention Type DEVICE

E.Motion© assisting device

E.Motion© is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair .

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard manual Wheelchair

Standard manual Wheelchair

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women aged between 18 and 70 years
* Spinal cord injury C5-C8, paraplegic D1-D11, and D11 paraplegic below only for phases 1 and 2 phase 1 and 2
* Spinal cord injury D1 and above only for phase 3
* Having given free and informed consent
* Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria

* No affiliation to a social security scheme
* Refusal to participate in the clinical trial
* Patient under guardianship
* Major cognitive disorders
* bedsores
* Functional abnormality of the shoulder
* History of cardiovascular disease
* ECG to suspect coronary insufficiency
* Pregnant patients without effective treatment or contraceptive
* Acute complication or systemic organ
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadine NP PELLEGRINI, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, 92380 Garches, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Raymond Poincaré Hospital

Garches, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guillon B, Van-Hecke G, Iddir J, Pellegrini N, Beghoul N, Vaugier I, Figere M, Pradon D, Lofaso F. Evaluation of 3 pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):894-904. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25620717 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-A00151-40

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.