Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-08-01
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To this end, we designed a randomized controlled experimental study on neurological patients, with the aim of evaluating the effects of robotic neurorehabilitation using Lokomat on physiological responses, compared to traditional therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional and Physiological Responses to Lokomat Therapy (Pilot Study)
NCT00883142
Brain and Coordination Changes Induced By Robotics and FES Treatment Following Stroke
NCT00237744
Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Rehabilitation in Persons With Stroke
NCT04002076
Hemiparetic Arm Robotic Mobilization With Non Invasive Electrical Stimulation
NCT03026712
Neuroimaging Biomarkers Toward a Personalized Upper Limb Action Observation Treatment in Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT04047134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic Treatment
The Lokomat is a robotic device. For treatment with the robotic system, the amount of body weight supported will initially set at 70% of every patient's weight, then decreasing in accordance with load tolerance, although not providing less than 20% support. The selected speed will be adapted to the patient's working comfort under the supervision of a trained physiotherapist. The rehabilitation protocol consists of 40 training sessions (3 sessions per week lasting 45 minutes).
Robotic Treatment
The Lokomat is a robotic device, consisting of a powered gait orthosis with integrated computer-controlled linear actuators at each hip and knee joint, a body weight support, and a treadmill. During the Lokomat training, the patients completed at least 30 min of treatment session.
Conventional Treatment
The CG will perform traditional overgroung gait rehabilitation. Exercises in this program are designed with gradual increments to meet each patient's abilities and were supervised by a physical therapist. The rehabilitation protocol consists of 40 training sessions (3 sessions per week lasting 45 minutes).
Conventional Treatment
The standard physical treatment program consisted of general conditioning exercises, including warming up (e.g. calf, shoulder, and hand passive range of motion exercises), lower and upper extremity strengthening, postural control exercises. During the conventional training, the patients completed at least 30 min of treatment session.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic Treatment
The Lokomat is a robotic device, consisting of a powered gait orthosis with integrated computer-controlled linear actuators at each hip and knee joint, a body weight support, and a treadmill. During the Lokomat training, the patients completed at least 30 min of treatment session.
Conventional Treatment
The standard physical treatment program consisted of general conditioning exercises, including warming up (e.g. calf, shoulder, and hand passive range of motion exercises), lower and upper extremity strengthening, postural control exercises. During the conventional training, the patients completed at least 30 min of treatment session.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion criteria: patients with a history of concomitant brain surgery; severe cognitive or language impairment; systemic, bone or joint disorders; presence of disabling sensory alterations; concomitant medical and psychiatric illness that could interfere with VR training.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Medical Director, Neurologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rocco S Calabrò, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Neurolesi
Messina, Sicily, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Rocco S Calabrò
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Calabro RS, Russo M, Naro A, De Luca R, Leo A, Tomasello P, Molonia F, Dattola V, Bramanti A, Bramanti P. Robotic gait training in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: Can virtual reality make the difference? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2017 Jun 15;377:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.047. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Calabro RS, Cacciola A, Berte F, Manuli A, Leo A, Bramanti A, Naro A, Milardi D, Bramanti P. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr;37(4):503-14. doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2474-4. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRCCSME:15/2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.