Neurofeedback-EEG Rehabilitation Protocol on Motor Recovery in the Subacute Phase Post-stroke (CUSTOM-NF-STROKE)
NCT ID: NCT06212219
Last Updated: 2024-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-08
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to compare a "standard NF" procedure to a "personalized NF" procedure designed to optimize the level of patient acceptability based on the results obtained through these questionnaires.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neurofeedback for Upper-limb Recovery After Stroke
NCT03766113
HAptic Neurofeedback Design for Stroke
NCT04130711
Neurofeedback for Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT03775915
Biofeedback After Stroke
NCT07149129
Rehabilitation With Biofeedback in Neurology
NCT05486052
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several meta-analyses now show the effectiveness of these approaches based on NF-EEG in terms of motor recovery. Cervera et al. (2018)2, Bai et al. (2020)3, Nojima et al. (2022)4 concluded, for example, an effect size of 0.61 to 0.86 on motor recovery (FMA scores) when comparing the effects of NF training during the subacute phase of stroke, compared to other rehabilitation procedures.
However, NF-EEG remains little used in practice. The team hypothesizes that this low level of translation outside laboratories is partly linked to a low level of acceptability and usability of the NF.
The team first identified the factors influencing this acceptability and usability of post-stroke motor rehabilitation procedures based on NF using questionnaires, both among patients and caregivers.
To meet the objective of the study, the investigative team is focusing on patients undergoing post-stroke rehabilitation who are in the subacute phase (15 days to 6 months after the stroke) because several studies have demonstrated that they This was the most favorable period for motor recovery (Dromerick et al. - 2021, Wahl et al. - 2014)5-6.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Neurofeedback Procedure
The standard NF (sensory feedback) will consist of motor imagery tasks, that is to say that the patient will have to imagine themselves carrying out movements, without real motor execution.
Two types of movements will be alternately requested: a complete sustained extension of the fingers of the paralyzed hand, a global movement of the arm (e.g. opening of the elbow) of the paralyzed arm.
NASA Task Load Index questionnaire
This scale assesses psychological validity from the perspective of mental workload. 6 words are offered to the patient about his mental load and he can respond at least "little" and at maximum "A lot"
Agency test
Questionnaire in which statements referring to the patient's general feeling and/or beliefs are presented. the patient has the choice between completely disagree (minimum) and totally agree (maximum)
Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery Questionnaire
The aim of this questionnaire is to obtain an index of individuals' ability to mentally represent different movements. Different movements to imagine are indicated and the patient responds based on their ability to imagine the movement.
He has the choice between "as clear as a film" (maximum) and "no image" (minimum)
Technology Locus of Control Assessment Questionnaire
The questionnaire focuses on patients' opinions on problems related to the use of technical devices. It presents twelve statements that the patient can affirm or deny, depending on their personal point of view. The patient can respond at least "disagree at all" and at maximum "agree completely"
POSITIVE AFFECTIVITY AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY SCALE
This scale is made up of a list of words that indicate certain emotions or feelings. The patient must carefully read each of these words and spontaneously indicate at what level he feels this way at the time he responds to this scale. To do this, he can answer at least "Very little or not at all" and at maximum "A lot"
Neurofeedback procedure
Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a companion is to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress.), of the virtual environment.
Fugl-Meyer test
419 / 5 000 Résultats de traduction Résultat de traduction This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum)
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire
This psychometric motivation questionnaire offers the patient words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposition they can respond between rather positive (maximum) or rather negative (minimum)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of anxiety and depression. Concerning anxiety, to each proposition, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (never/not at all) and 3 at maximum (very often) and about depression, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (often, always) and 3 at maximum (never/not at all) The patient can calculate his score at the end
State Anxiety Inventory scores
This questionnaire measures the patient's anxiety at a given time. It features a number of statements that people have previously used to describe themselves. For each statement, choose a "grade" from 1 (not at all) to 4 (Very much)
Acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT)
This questionnaire asks the patient about their level of acceptability of NF training using words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposal they can respond on their feelings regarding the proposals.
System Usability Scale questionnaire
This questionnaire evaluates the usability of personalized NF procedures compared to standard procedures. To each statement, the patient can respond between a minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and a maximum of 5 (totally agree).
Self-questionnaire: OCEAN of the five major factors of per- sound (or Big Five model)
The model for measuring personality factors is the Anglo-Saxon model known as the "Big Five" or OCEAN in French. It measures 5 major personality traits: openness to experiences, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. The OCEAN questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire to be given to a person who wishes to evaluate themselves. It includes 45 items presented in the table below. For each item, patients have 5 response possibilities numbered from 1 to 5: 1 for "strongly disapproves" and 5 for "strongly approves". The patient can calculate his score at the end
Feeling VAS scores
The EVA scale relates to the patient's personal feelings: perceived difficulty, perceived fatigue, perceived ease of learning, level of embodiment, Relevance, Demonstrability of results, Fun aspect, Benefit/risk ratio, Self-efficacy.
For each statement, the patient can respond on a scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (minimum) to "totally agree" (maximum).
Reaching Performance Scale
This scale analyzes the evolution of speed, precision and range of movement using motion capture tools. For each statement, the patient has a rating between 0 (corresponds to not possible) and 3 (corresponds to entirely possible)
Personalized Neurofeedback Procedure
Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a virtual companion to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress) , of the virtual environment.
NASA Task Load Index questionnaire
This scale assesses psychological validity from the perspective of mental workload. 6 words are offered to the patient about his mental load and he can respond at least "little" and at maximum "A lot"
Agency test
Questionnaire in which statements referring to the patient's general feeling and/or beliefs are presented. the patient has the choice between completely disagree (minimum) and totally agree (maximum)
Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery Questionnaire
The aim of this questionnaire is to obtain an index of individuals' ability to mentally represent different movements. Different movements to imagine are indicated and the patient responds based on their ability to imagine the movement.
He has the choice between "as clear as a film" (maximum) and "no image" (minimum)
Technology Locus of Control Assessment Questionnaire
The questionnaire focuses on patients' opinions on problems related to the use of technical devices. It presents twelve statements that the patient can affirm or deny, depending on their personal point of view. The patient can respond at least "disagree at all" and at maximum "agree completely"
POSITIVE AFFECTIVITY AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY SCALE
This scale is made up of a list of words that indicate certain emotions or feelings. The patient must carefully read each of these words and spontaneously indicate at what level he feels this way at the time he responds to this scale. To do this, he can answer at least "Very little or not at all" and at maximum "A lot"
Neurofeedback procedure
Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a companion is to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress.), of the virtual environment.
Fugl-Meyer test
419 / 5 000 Résultats de traduction Résultat de traduction This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum)
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire
This psychometric motivation questionnaire offers the patient words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposition they can respond between rather positive (maximum) or rather negative (minimum)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of anxiety and depression. Concerning anxiety, to each proposition, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (never/not at all) and 3 at maximum (very often) and about depression, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (often, always) and 3 at maximum (never/not at all) The patient can calculate his score at the end
State Anxiety Inventory scores
This questionnaire measures the patient's anxiety at a given time. It features a number of statements that people have previously used to describe themselves. For each statement, choose a "grade" from 1 (not at all) to 4 (Very much)
Acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT)
This questionnaire asks the patient about their level of acceptability of NF training using words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposal they can respond on their feelings regarding the proposals.
System Usability Scale questionnaire
This questionnaire evaluates the usability of personalized NF procedures compared to standard procedures. To each statement, the patient can respond between a minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and a maximum of 5 (totally agree).
Self-questionnaire: OCEAN of the five major factors of per- sound (or Big Five model)
The model for measuring personality factors is the Anglo-Saxon model known as the "Big Five" or OCEAN in French. It measures 5 major personality traits: openness to experiences, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. The OCEAN questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire to be given to a person who wishes to evaluate themselves. It includes 45 items presented in the table below. For each item, patients have 5 response possibilities numbered from 1 to 5: 1 for "strongly disapproves" and 5 for "strongly approves". The patient can calculate his score at the end
Feeling VAS scores
The EVA scale relates to the patient's personal feelings: perceived difficulty, perceived fatigue, perceived ease of learning, level of embodiment, Relevance, Demonstrability of results, Fun aspect, Benefit/risk ratio, Self-efficacy.
For each statement, the patient can respond on a scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (minimum) to "totally agree" (maximum).
Reaching Performance Scale
This scale analyzes the evolution of speed, precision and range of movement using motion capture tools. For each statement, the patient has a rating between 0 (corresponds to not possible) and 3 (corresponds to entirely possible)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NASA Task Load Index questionnaire
This scale assesses psychological validity from the perspective of mental workload. 6 words are offered to the patient about his mental load and he can respond at least "little" and at maximum "A lot"
Agency test
Questionnaire in which statements referring to the patient's general feeling and/or beliefs are presented. the patient has the choice between completely disagree (minimum) and totally agree (maximum)
Visual and Kinesthetic Imagery Questionnaire
The aim of this questionnaire is to obtain an index of individuals' ability to mentally represent different movements. Different movements to imagine are indicated and the patient responds based on their ability to imagine the movement.
He has the choice between "as clear as a film" (maximum) and "no image" (minimum)
Technology Locus of Control Assessment Questionnaire
The questionnaire focuses on patients' opinions on problems related to the use of technical devices. It presents twelve statements that the patient can affirm or deny, depending on their personal point of view. The patient can respond at least "disagree at all" and at maximum "agree completely"
POSITIVE AFFECTIVITY AND NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY SCALE
This scale is made up of a list of words that indicate certain emotions or feelings. The patient must carefully read each of these words and spontaneously indicate at what level he feels this way at the time he responds to this scale. To do this, he can answer at least "Very little or not at all" and at maximum "A lot"
Neurofeedback procedure
Personalized NF will consist of adding to these motor imagery tasks, personalized aspects depending on the patient's profile, for example in terms of level of support and emotional support (addition of a relaxation exercise using an audio recording at the start of training - and in the middle of training if necessary, adding the presence of a companion is to provide social presence and emotional support, depending on the user's performance and progress.), of the virtual environment.
Fugl-Meyer test
419 / 5 000 Résultats de traduction Résultat de traduction This questionnaire assesses the motor selectivity of the upper limb. Several questions are asked about the movements that the patient can perform and to each question, the patient can answer either 0 (minimum) and 2 (maximum)
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire
This psychometric motivation questionnaire offers the patient words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposition they can respond between rather positive (maximum) or rather negative (minimum)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
This questionnaire assesses the patient's state of anxiety and depression. Concerning anxiety, to each proposition, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (never/not at all) and 3 at maximum (very often) and about depression, the patient can answer a number between 0 at minimum (often, always) and 3 at maximum (never/not at all) The patient can calculate his score at the end
State Anxiety Inventory scores
This questionnaire measures the patient's anxiety at a given time. It features a number of statements that people have previously used to describe themselves. For each statement, choose a "grade" from 1 (not at all) to 4 (Very much)
Acceptability questionnaire (BCI-ACCEPT)
This questionnaire asks the patient about their level of acceptability of NF training using words representative of their motivation to carry out the neurofeedback session and for each proposal they can respond on their feelings regarding the proposals.
System Usability Scale questionnaire
This questionnaire evaluates the usability of personalized NF procedures compared to standard procedures. To each statement, the patient can respond between a minimum of 1 (strongly disagree) and a maximum of 5 (totally agree).
Self-questionnaire: OCEAN of the five major factors of per- sound (or Big Five model)
The model for measuring personality factors is the Anglo-Saxon model known as the "Big Five" or OCEAN in French. It measures 5 major personality traits: openness to experiences, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. The OCEAN questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire to be given to a person who wishes to evaluate themselves. It includes 45 items presented in the table below. For each item, patients have 5 response possibilities numbered from 1 to 5: 1 for "strongly disapproves" and 5 for "strongly approves". The patient can calculate his score at the end
Feeling VAS scores
The EVA scale relates to the patient's personal feelings: perceived difficulty, perceived fatigue, perceived ease of learning, level of embodiment, Relevance, Demonstrability of results, Fun aspect, Benefit/risk ratio, Self-efficacy.
For each statement, the patient can respond on a scale ranging from "strongly disagree" (minimum) to "totally agree" (maximum).
Reaching Performance Scale
This scale analyzes the evolution of speed, precision and range of movement using motion capture tools. For each statement, the patient has a rating between 0 (corresponds to not possible) and 3 (corresponds to entirely possible)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Motor deficit of the upper limb type of hemiplegia, secondary to a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke authenticated by brain imaging (MRI or CT)
* Post-stroke patients in the subacute phase, between 15 days and 6 months after the stroke
* Correct or corrected vision allowing reading at a distance of 0 to 2m
* Ability to maintain a seated position for 1 hour
* Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
* Informed patient having signed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Phasic disorder limiting comprehension corresponding to a Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) score \< 4
* Attentional disorder not allowing sufficient attention to be maintained for 1 hour
* History of known stroke with motor sequelae.
* Known peripheral neurological pathology affecting the paretic upper limb.
* Other known central neurological pathology
* Factors hindering EEG acquisition (scalp pathology, abnormal cervico-cephalic movements, cranial metal implants)
* Unstabilized epilepsy
* Refusal to participate in the study
* Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
* Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding patient
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GASQ David, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de TOULOUSE
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC31/22/0477
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.