Assessment of Stability of Behavioral and Neural Measures of Attention Networks Across Multiple Sessions

NCT ID: NCT04033731

Last Updated: 2020-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-11-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to learn more about the stability over multiple recording sessions of brainwave activity during a computerized task that measures different types of attention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Attention is the backbone of cognitive systems and is requisite for other cognitive processes vital to everyday functioning, such as memory, problem solving, language skills, and the cognitive control of behavior. Impairments in attention can result from a variety of factors, such as brain injury, and neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as various psychopathologies. A prominent multi-component model of visuospatial attention developed by Posner and colleagues conceptualizes visuospatial attention as an "organ system" comprised of three independent, yet interactive networks which include: 1) Alerting, the generation and maintenance of a vigilant state that facilitates the processing of an upcoming stimulus, 2) Orienting, the disengagement, shifting, and reallocation of attention to a spatial location, and 3) Executive control, the resolution of conflict among competing mutually-exclusive responses that enables selective focus. To aid in understanding of attention, the Attention Network Test (ANT) was developed as a brief computerized measure of the efficiency of each of these networks and has been extensively used in a variety of healthy and clinical populations. Several studies have examined differences in ERPs during the ANT in healthy aging and clinical populations such as ADHD, schizophrenia, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) but have not conducted repeated sessions of the task to evaluate changes over time. While the ANT has been shown to be robustly sensitive to a range of cognitive and/or neuropsychological disorders, the reliability of the ANT across multiple sessions, particularly in terms of neural activity measures, has not been previously examined. An important focus of the proposed research regards the stability of neural measures reflecting activity of each of three different attention networks. One method for examining neural activity involves time locked electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings of brain activity or scalp-recorded brain event-related potentials (ERPs). ERPs can provide insights into the neural correlates of cognitive processes elicited by an experimental task as well as the neural time course. Particularly relevant to this study, the visual N1, a negative-going ERP deflection occurring \~150-200 milliseconds (ms) post-stimulus. N1 amplitude is considered to index attentional allocation. Additionally, a later-occurring positive-going deflection occurring \~300-ms post-stimulus, P3, reflects processes associated with stimulus evaluation and categorization. Previous research in our lab has shown that N1 and P3 are differentially sensitive to attention network functioning probed using the ANT in neurologically-healthy controls and are sensitive to attentional impairment in TBI survivors. Thus, the study team will focus on the stability of N1 and P3 waveforms across the 4 sessions. Previous studies have examined reliability and stability of behavioral measures of the ANT by evaluating the reliability of reaction time (RT) and error rates over multiple sessions. Ishigami reported good temporal stability of network scores across 10 sessions, although some practice effects were seen in orienting and executive-control attention networks. Importantly, no prior work has examined the temporal stability of ERPs with repeated ANT performance, which is among the primary aims of the proposed research. Finally, in an exploratory manner, the investigators will extend findings from one of our earlier studies demonstrating altitudinal attentional biases for upper vertical space in healthy participants and the absence of such biases in TBI survivors. Specifically, the investigators will examine which of three attentional networks are sensitive to such biases in healthy controls and determine the ERP signatures of these biases.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stability of Attentional Networks Over Multiple Sessions of Computerized Task

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Controls

Participants will include 15 healthy men and women aged 18-40 years, right-hand dominant, Native English speakers, with normal or corrected-to-normal vision.

Attention Network Task

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a computerized cognitive task designed to efficiently probe three independent but interactive attentional networks (alerting, orienting, executive control) in a single task paradigm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Attention Network Task

The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a computerized cognitive task designed to efficiently probe three independent but interactive attentional networks (alerting, orienting, executive control) in a single task paradigm.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Electroencephalography

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* right-hand dominant
* Native English speakers
* with normal or corrected-to-normal vision

Exclusion Criteria

* Not right-hand dominant
* Does not speak english as a native language
* No history of neurological disorder such as stroke, epilepsy or chronic seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury or concussion, psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression or anxiety disorder, any psychiatric inpatient hospitalization for any of these disorders, or previously diagnosed learning disability
* Currently taking any prescribed medications for anxiety, depression, or seizures
* Alcohol use more than 3 days a week
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William Perlstein, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0217BBRC-02

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB201600188

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sonification Embodied Associations
NCT03931278 COMPLETED NA
Motor Imagery in Aphantasia
NCT06140940 RECRUITING NA