Postop Pain in the MICS Patients Versus Sternotomy Patients

NCT ID: NCT04003584

Last Updated: 2023-03-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

179 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To adequately assess postoperative pain in the coronary artery bypass surgical population a multicentered retrospective chart review was carried out; the study utilized a nonexperimental comparative descriptive study design. The retrospective review was conducted over a six-month time frame, consisting of June 2017 through November 2017, at two hospitals within the same organization. The data collection process began in late December of 2017 and January of 2018. The assessment of postop pain was performed by using a standard 11-point numeric pain rating scale on post extubation day one and the day of discharge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Bypass patients

Coronary bypass surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Reviewed postoperative coronary bypass patients and compared postoperative pain levels

Traditional Sternotomy Cardiac Bypass patients

Coronary bypass surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Reviewed postoperative coronary bypass patients and compared postoperative pain levels

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Coronary bypass surgery

Reviewed postoperative coronary bypass patients and compared postoperative pain levels

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who had an isolated coronary artery bypass surgery at Charlotte Medical Center (CMC) and CMC-Pineville
* Minimally invasive cardiac surgery
* Traditional sternotomy cardiac surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented history of any chronic pain syndromes requiring active treatment
* The "relative" recent requirement of narcotic analgesic use for pain relief prior to operation
* Any CABG operation that inadvertently resulted in an operative surgical complication
* Patient cases that resulted in a readmission within 30 days from surgery.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeko Madjarov, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Atrium Health

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB file #09-17-29E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuroaxial Prophylaxis for CABG
NCT04244435 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1