Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Open Heart Surgery Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass

NCT ID: NCT05011617

Last Updated: 2022-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Though Cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) under epidural anesthesia in conscious patients is associated with increased risk of epidural hematoma. The investigators developed a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) platform for cardiac surgery under CPB. In the current prospective study, the investigators investigated the safety and effectiveness of the MAC platform versus intubated general anesthesia (IGA) in patients receiving elective open-heart surgery.

The study included adult patients who were scheduled to undergo open-heart surgery under CPB at Shuguang Hospital between April 2012 and December 2021. MAC consisted of local anesthesia at the site of sternotomy, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil and electroacupuncture. MAC versus IGA was chosen by the patients. The investigators will investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MAC platform versus IGA in patients receiving elective open-heart surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The detailed description of clinical trial will be published by protocol later.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Monitored Anesthesia Care Cardiac Surgery Postoperative Recovery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
We set a blind code in case patients have adverse effects. The random code and blind code will be conducted using opaque envelopes by a "third party" independent of the study. The envelopes will be sealed and shuffled, and the assignment records will not be disclosed until the end of the study. Trial participants, cardiothoracic surgeons, anesthesiologists, outcome assessors, and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment allocation to minimize potential sources of bias. Only the nurse of the anesthesiology department (having received specialized acupuncture training) will know the participants' group allocations. However, this nurse will not know any other information about the patients.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MAC group

Electroacupuncture was performed for two consecutive days before surgery (2 daily 30-min sessions) by a licensed acupuncturist at 4.0 mA using an alternating frequency of 2 and 100 Hz (every 1.5 seconds) (LH-202, Huawei, Beijing, China). Acupoints included bilateral Yunmen (LU2), Zhongfu (LU1), Lieque (LU7), and Neiguan (PC6). On the day of surgery, electroacupuncture started upon the completion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine, was suspended when CPB started (to avoid interference with electrocardiogram recording) and continued until the end of surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC) consisted of non-intubation technique, local anesthesia at the site of sternotomy, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil, and electroacupuncture.

IGA group

Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2.0-3.5 μg/mL) by target control infusion and 0.3-0.5 μg/kg sufentanil. Tracheal intubation was facilitated by rocuronium (1.0 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using isoflurane at 0.7-1.0 minimal alveolar concentration in a gas mixture of oxygen and air and remifentanil (0.05-0.2 μg·kg-1·min-1) by intravenous injection pump. Sufentanil dose was totally 2.5-4.0 μg/kg. Muscle relaxation was achieved using 1/3-1/4 of the induction dose every 40-60 min based on a train of four. Mechanical ventilation with 80% O2 in air was used. Tidal volume (7-8 mL/kg) and respiratory rate (10-12/min) were adjusted according to PETCO2 to achieve normal ventilation (PETCO2 35-45 mmHg).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC)

Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC) consisted of non-intubation technique, local anesthesia at the site of sternotomy, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil, and electroacupuncture.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\) NYHA class II or less;
* 2\) expected aortic block time at ≤ 120 min;
* 3\) body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/cm2.

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\) systolic pulmonary blood pressure \> 70 mmHg;
* 2\) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, or simplified airway risk index \> 3;
* 3\) Child-Pugh grade B or C liver insufficiency or renal insufficiency (24-h creatinine clearance \< 80 mL/min and blood urea nitrogen \> 7.5 mmol/L);
* 4\) coagulopathy (aPTT prolongation \> 10 seconds versus normal controls, PT prolongation \> 3 seconds versus normal controls, and INR \> 3.0).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ShuGuang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jiangang Song

Director of anesthesiology department of Shuguang Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jianggang Song, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Acupuncture and Anesthesia Research Institute, Shanghai, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

81603450

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Etomidate Versus Propofol in CABG Surgery
NCT06068764 RECRUITING PHASE4
Protection During Cardiac Surgery.
NCT03230136 COMPLETED NA