Thrombin Generation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass With Titrated Versus Conventional Anticoagulation Management.
NCT ID: NCT03347201
Last Updated: 2020-12-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-02
2019-05-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether relative to patients with conventional management, those managed with the HMS Plus have improved thrombin generation after CPB.
The secondary objective is to determine if patients in the HMS Plus group have reduced blood loss in the first 24 hours following surgery compared with patients in the conventional group.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Hemostasis Management System (HMS Plus) offers an alternative way of dosing and monitoring heparin by aiming to achieve a pre-determined heparin concentration throughout CPB, rather than being determined by the ACT. It also aims to determine the dose of protamine, the drug used to reverse heparin at the end CPB, required based on residual heparin concentration rather than on a 1:1 ratio of the total dose of heparin given which is the common current practice. The benefits of using this system are proposed to be more effective anticoagulation during CPB meaning less of the body's reserves of clotting factors are consumed. This could mean potentially less bleeding and decrease requirement of blood products following surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
1. Initial heparin bolus before CPB to be calculated using HMS Plus.
2. Following commencement of CPB further heparin requirements will be determined using the HMS Plus. ACT's will also be checked whilst on CPB and if falls below 480 seconds, additional heparin will also be given.
3. Following cessation of CPB the dose of protamine required to reverse residual heparin will be calculated using the HMS Plus.
HMS Plus
Subjects randomized to the intervention group will have their dose of Heparin and Protamine calculated by the HMS Plus.
Control Group
Patients in the control arm will undergo routine heparin anticoagulation using a weight based initial dose of 400 units/kg, aiming for an ACT of \>480 seconds. Further heparin doses (5000 to 10000 units) will be given if the ACT falls below 480 seconds whilst on bypass. At the end of CPB heparin will be reversed with protamine using 1:1 ratio based on the initial dose of heparin given pre-bypass. HMS Plus measures will also be conducted in this group for study purposes, but the results will not be made available to the clinicians.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HMS Plus
Subjects randomized to the intervention group will have their dose of Heparin and Protamine calculated by the HMS Plus.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Planned use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
* Cases where use of brief circulatory arrest anticipated
* Highly complex cases (LVAD, Heart Transplant, Complex congenital)
* Significant liver dysfunction (liver enzymes \> 2-fold higher than upper limit of normal
* Pre-existing coagulopathy (INR \>1.5, PTT \>45 seconds, fibrinogen \< 1.0g/L, platelet count \<100x109/L)
* Use of long acting oral anticoagulants
* Patients on heparin infusions pre-operatively
* Major hemoglobinopathies, thalassemia or iron storage diseases
* Previous diagnosis of HIT
* Lack of informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jo Carroll
Manager Anesthesia Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Keyvan Karkouti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Li H, Bartoszko J, Serrick C, Rao V, Karkouti K. Titrated versus conventional anticoagulation management for thrombin generation in cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Sep;69(9):1117-1128. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02278-1. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-9761
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id