The Effect of the Hemobag® Ultrafiltration System on Blood Conservation and Coagulation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT ID: NCT01435304
Last Updated: 2018-06-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of HEMOBAG to Salvage Blood After Cardiac Surgery
NCT00176657
Management of Bleeding Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT00672516
Processed Residual Pump Blood in Cardiac Surgery: The PRBC Trial
NCT01173822
Centrifugation vs. Multiple-pass Hemofiltration of the Residual Cardiopulmonary Bypass Volume
NCT01416792
Sequestration of Platelets Prior to Bypass Reduces Bleeding After Cardiac Surgery
NCT00359398
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) consists of an extracorporeal (outside of the body) circuit which allows the circulation and oxygenation of blood during cardiac surgery. The circuit includes an oxygenator, a reservoir and tubing, all of which needs to be primed with a balanced electrolyte solution. Prior to initiating CPB, the venous and arterial ends of the CPB circuit are appropriately attached to the patient. The volume of the circuit is usually 1.5 liters which is equivalent to 30-38% of a typical patient's total blood volume that is generally between 4 and 5 liters.
When CPB is initiated, the patient's blood is mixed and diluted by the CPB priming fluid. Consequently, when the operation is completed and the CPB is discontinued, the content of the CPB circuit consists of the patient's diluted whole blood. The standard practice is to return as much of this hemodiluted CPB contents as the patient will accommodate and process the rest of the contents of the circuit with a cell washer and return packed red blood cells to the patient.
When the cell washer is used, plasma proteins, clotting factors and platelets are not returned to the patient. An alternate approach would be to use an ultrafiltration device to remove this non-cellular water and preserve proteins,
clotting factors and platelets as well as red blood cells that can then be returned to the patient. This alternate approach is the basic principle of the Hemobag®, an ultrafiltration technology and method.
Ultrafiltration is a well documented technique usually used in-line (interposed in the circuit) during CPB. The Hemobag® is a collection reservoir used to facilitate ultrafiltration of the CPB circuit after the patient has been disconnected from CPB). It represents a novel and safe modification of the modified ultrafiltration system (MUF). MUF is a technique commonly used in cardiac surgery for many years, especially with smaller hemodiluted patients, and mainly in the pediatric population.
The focus of the Hemobag® system is on whole blood volume recovery as opposed to red cell volume recovery only, and helping to satisfy the requirements of the patient after CPB has been discontinued: hemostasis, reversal of dilutional effects, and returning back to homeostasis, which is the normal physiologic and metabolic status of the patient.
The investigators hypothesize that the Hemobag® method of returning residual CPB blood is superior to the current practice of cell washing and concentration. This hypothesis is based on previous studies that have shown that the ultrafiltrated whole blood product is superior to the cell-washed RBC product. The main purpose of this study is to discover the differences in outcome measures when, at the end of CPB, the residual diluted pump blood is processed by either cell washing or by the Hemobag® method. The null hypothesis states that there would be no difference in post-operative patient outcomes when residual pump blood is processed by either a cell washing method or the Hemobag® protocol.
Pilot Study:
The investigators did an Maine Medical Center (MMC) Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved pilot study in March 2011 which consisted of ten (10) cases in order to confirm the significant treatment effect shown in other studies and to familiarize the team with the Hemobag® system. Outcome metrics included chest catheter drainage in the first 24 hours post-operative, allogeneic blood component requirements (red blood cells (RBC's), platelets, plasma), platelet counts, evidence of acute kidney injury by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) definition, mortality, stroke, and requirements for inotropic support on the second post-operative day. The results of the pilot study showed a promising trend with regard to less chest catheter drainage and higher platelet counts.
Materials and Methods and Analysis:
The investigators propose to do a randomized, controlled trial comparing the two methods as described above: The standard method of returning the residual pump volume to the patient as washed, centrifuged cells (control group) and the Hemobag® method of returning residual CPB blood (study group).
Outcome metrics will be the same as they were for the pilot study:
(1) Chest catheter drainage in the first 24 hours post-operative; (2) Allogeneic blood component requirements (RBC's, platelets, plasma); (3) Pre and post operative platelet counts; (4) Evidence of acute kidney injury by AKIN definition; (5) Mortality; (6) Stroke; (7) Requirements for inotropic support on the 2nd post-operative day.
The investigators propose to enroll 100 patients, 50 in the control group and 50 in the study group. The study will be limited to adults (18 years and older) who have heart surgery (valve and /or coronary) using CPB who do not have anemia or coagulation disorders preoperatively.
An interim analysis will be performed by an independent, unblended analyst to determine efficacy and safety half way through the study (50 patients). Terminating the study early would be a consideration if one group were clearly superior to the other or if there were safety issues. In the event that there are no concerns regarding superiority or safety, the study would continue until the entire sample size has been studied. The results of the interim analysis will be submitted to the IRB.
Conclusion:
There are a number of intra-operative blood management strategies in cardiac surgery and the salvage of post-CPB whole blood using ultrafiltration from the CPB circuit is emerging as one of the most significant contributors to reducing allogeneic blood component use in cardiovascular surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the Hemobag® method of returning residual CPB blood is superior to the current practice of cell washing and concentration and more expeditious than modified ultrafiltration (MUF).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hemobag®
Hemobag® method of returning residual CPB blood (study group)
method of returning residual CPB blood ( Hemobag®)
The Hemobag® is a collection reservoir used to facilitate ultrafiltration of the CPB circuit after the patient has been disconnected from CPB).
cell saver
Standard method of returning the residual pump volume to the patient as washed, centrifuged cells (control group)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
method of returning residual CPB blood ( Hemobag®)
The Hemobag® is a collection reservoir used to facilitate ultrafiltration of the CPB circuit after the patient has been disconnected from CPB).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Global Blood Resources, LLC
OTHER
MaineHealth
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert Kramer, MD
Director of Research and Quality Improvement Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Kramer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MaineHealth
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB # 3914
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.