Management of Moderately Hypoxemic Thoracic Trauma

NCT ID: NCT03997630

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

770 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-12

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In France, the average incidence of thoracic trauma is 10,000 to 15,000 each year. These patients are at risk of early and late post traumatic respiratory complications as follows: pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), hypoxemia. Main issues of thoracic trauma management were recently published by French anesthesiologist and intensivist experts. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was recommended in case of severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 \< 200). In comparison to conventional oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, NIV reduced length of stay, incidence of complications and mortality in case of severe hypoxemia. For mild or moderate hypoxemic patients, no devices were tested to prevent respiratory complications. At the moment, low-flow oxygenation is administered to these patients in the absence of severe hypoxemia. Recently, many studies have found promising results with high-flow oxygenation delivered by nasal cannula. This device has many physiological advantages: wash out the naso-pharyngeal dead space, increase end expiratory lung volume, deliver a moderate or low level of Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), improve work of breathing and confort. Several randomized controlled trials tested this device in many clinical settings, but there are no studies on its use after thoracic trauma. A comparative trial is needed to evaluate early prophylactic administration of high-flow oxygenation after thoracic trauma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

TrOMaTho study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, unblinded, controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare a prophylactic use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (experimental group) to low-flow oxygenation (control group) after thoracic trauma. 770 patients will be included. Randomization will be conducted with random block and patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio in one of the two groups. Randomization process will be stratified on: age (more or less 65 years old), use of peridural analgesia and existence of extra thoracic trauma. Only the oxygenation technique is studied, all other aspects of management will be handle by the attending physician.

All patients will be followed from enrollment to hospital discharge. To ensure the same data collection in all centers, six visits are planned: day (D) 1 (inclusion), D7, D14, D28.

Classical blinded methods cannot be used for the evaluation of these kinds of devices. To ensure the same evaluation for all patients and in all centers, all relevant outcomes will be evaluated by an independent clinical event committee. Statistical analysis will be performed by an independent statistician.

Primary endpoint will be analyzed according to intention to treat. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed as exploratory analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Trauma High Flow Oxygenation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interventional group

Interventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High flow Oxygenation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol.

Control group

Control group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate \< 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard oxygen

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate \< 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High flow Oxygenation

Interventional group: All patients included in this group will receive a continuous heated and humidified high-flow (30 to 60 l/min) oxygenation with a nasal cannula for 48 hours. Initially, flow rate will be started at 50 l/min with a FiO2 at 50%. According to the protocol, flow rate and FiO2 will be titrated on SpO2 and respiratory tolerance. Weaning and failure of high-flow oxygenation are described in detail in the study protocol.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard oxygen

Control group: All patients included in this group will receive a low flow oxygenation (flow rate \< 15 l/min) with nasal cannula (flow rate ≤ 6 l/min) or non-rebreathing mask (flow rate ≥ 7 l/min).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major patient (age ≥ 18 years),
* Admitted to intensive care unit for less than 48 hours for the management of chest trauma.
* Closed chest trauma, non-penetrating, with a TTSS score\> or equal to 4.
* Need for conventional oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2 greater than or equal to 95%.
* Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme
* Patient having signed a consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe hypoxemia defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 200 noted before randomization
* Recommended indication for NIV: cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, decompensated COPD.
* Indication to immediate oro-tracheal intubation. (will not be excluded patients requiring general anaesthesia for a surgical procedure for a peripheral surgical procedure or embolization)

* Patient with acute respiratory distress, whatever the cause.
* Hemodynamic instability marked by a fall of the PAS\> 30% or a PAS \<110 mmHg despite the initial resuscitation measures
* Neurological degradation with Glasgow score less than 12
* Pregnant or lactating woman
* Patient under guardianship or curatorship
* Contraindication to the use of one or both devices studied (decaying facial trauma)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Brest

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de Cornouaille

Quimper, Brittany Region, France

Site Status

Angers university hospital

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU de Brest

Brest, , France

Site Status

Chartres Hospital

Chartres, , France

Site Status

HIA Percy

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Dreux hospital

Dreux, , France

Site Status

Le Mans hospital

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud

Lorient, , France

Site Status

La Timone Hospital (AP-HM)

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Marseille university horpital

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Morlaix hospital

Morlaix, , France

Site Status

Nantes university hospital

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHRU de la Pitié-Salpétrière

Paris, , France

Site Status

Kremlin Bicêtre university hospital (APHP)

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes, university Hospital

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Tours university hospital

Tours, , France

Site Status

CHBA de Vannes

Vannes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

29BRC18.0159

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.