Influence of Luting Cement on the Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Pediatric Crowns

NCT ID: NCT03993431

Last Updated: 2019-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this split-mouth study was to compare the efficacy of using Bio-active cement versus Packable glass ionomer for cementation of posterior zirconia pediatric crowns.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Restoration of pulp treated or badly broken down deciduous teeth with full coverage restoration have shown superior success rate to all other restorative materials.

Restoration of deciduous teeth with esthetic full coverage restoration has been a challenging aim especially for the more functionally loaded posterior teeth. Due to the continuous increase in socio-economic standards; restoring posterior teeth with esthetic restoration is on high demand nowadays.

The recently introduced zirconia pediatric crowns have been very promising in terms of strength and toughness. Clinical trials on maxillary incisors have shown very high success rates in terms of retention and gingival health.

The problem of restoring posterior deciduous teeth with pre-fabricated zirconia crowns is that its retention is only and totally dependent on luting cement, in addition to the problem of the deteriorated gingival condition around crowns in general.

Being recently introduced to the market; there have not been any clinical trials studying retention of zirconia posterior pediatric crowns published yet.

Recently introduced bio-active cement \[NuSmileĀ® BioCemā„¢\] is claimed by the manufacturer to be the solution of this problem due to the shock absorbing effect, bioactive components, and antimicrobial effect making it tougher than traditional cements and more gingival friendly.

Also, experienced clinicians have found that packable glass ionomer gives very acceptable results for retention of zirconia pediatric crowns. This may be due to the fact that, pre-fabricated pediatric crown is not well adapted to the prepared tooth creating a greater gap between the prepared tooth and the crown, resulting in a greater film thickness of luting cement, which may benefit from the stronger, tougher and less soluble packable glass ionomer rather than the conventional glass ionomer cement for cementation of zirconia crowns.

There is no clear evidence whether it's better to cement zirconia based crowns with conventional or adhesive cement; and to the investigator's knowledge, there is no data available for the best clinical practice in cementation of zirconia pediatric crowns; and so, this study was carried out to compare the effectiveness of bio-active cement with packable glass ionomer when used for cementation of zirconia pediatric crowns.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deep Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

split mouth
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bio-active cement

Bio-active cement dispensed into the crown, and the crown was properly positioned over the tooth, cement was allowed to self-set for 20 seconds while maintaining gentle pressure on the crown, then flash cured using a light curing unit to remove excess cement, buccal and lingual surfaces were light cured for extra 10 seconds each.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bio-active cement

Intervention Type DRUG

A cement used for crown cementation, specially recommended for pediatric esthetic crowns

Packable glass ionomer

Dentin conditioner was applied to the prepared crown surfaces for 20 sec, then rinsed, and dried. Capsule was activated, mixed for 10 seconds in an amalgamator, then loaded into the capsule applier to extrude cement directly into the crown, the crown was properly positioned over the tooth, cement was allowed to self-set for 2 minutes while maintaining gentle pressure on the crown, excess cement was removed before complete setting of cement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Packable glass ionomer

Intervention Type DRUG

Glass ionomer cement with improved mechanical properties usually used for restoration of simple small cavities and in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bio-active cement

A cement used for crown cementation, specially recommended for pediatric esthetic crowns

Intervention Type DRUG

Packable glass ionomer

Glass ionomer cement with improved mechanical properties usually used for restoration of simple small cavities and in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bio-cem Fuji IX High viscosity glass ionomer

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 4-7 years old patients having two contra-lateral mandibular first primary molars indicated for restoration with crowns.
2. Presence of sound tooth structure at the cervical margins of the teeth.
3. Presence of opposing functioning teeth.
4. Included teeth should be assessed clinically as free from active pulpal or periodontal conditions.
5. Patient must be in general good health, with no medical contraindication to dental treatment.
6. Patient must be available for required recalls as outlined in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Teeth with defects like hypoplasia or hypocalcification.
2. Patients with untreated periodontal disease.
3. Patients with any pathological or systemic problems that would not allow the dental procedures in this study to take place.
4. Teeth that exhibit mobility.
5. Patients that show signs of severe bruxism or teeth clenching.
6. Subjects with deleterious oral habits like pencil/pen chewing.
7. Uncooperative patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fayoum University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maha Moussa Azab

Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Zirconia crowns cementation

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.