Influence of Luting Cement on the Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Pediatric Crowns
NCT ID: NCT03993431
Last Updated: 2019-06-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Different Luting Cements for Pediatric Zirconia Crowns
NCT07152561
Comparison of the Clinical Success of Pediatric Zirconia Crowns Applied with Different Luting Cements
NCT06558747
Management of Occlusal Caries Using Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
NCT04354636
Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars.
NCT04620174
Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material in Vital Teeth
NCT03437655
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Restoration of deciduous teeth with esthetic full coverage restoration has been a challenging aim especially for the more functionally loaded posterior teeth. Due to the continuous increase in socio-economic standards; restoring posterior teeth with esthetic restoration is on high demand nowadays.
The recently introduced zirconia pediatric crowns have been very promising in terms of strength and toughness. Clinical trials on maxillary incisors have shown very high success rates in terms of retention and gingival health.
The problem of restoring posterior deciduous teeth with pre-fabricated zirconia crowns is that its retention is only and totally dependent on luting cement, in addition to the problem of the deteriorated gingival condition around crowns in general.
Being recently introduced to the market; there have not been any clinical trials studying retention of zirconia posterior pediatric crowns published yet.
Recently introduced bio-active cement \[NuSmileĀ® BioCemā¢\] is claimed by the manufacturer to be the solution of this problem due to the shock absorbing effect, bioactive components, and antimicrobial effect making it tougher than traditional cements and more gingival friendly.
Also, experienced clinicians have found that packable glass ionomer gives very acceptable results for retention of zirconia pediatric crowns. This may be due to the fact that, pre-fabricated pediatric crown is not well adapted to the prepared tooth creating a greater gap between the prepared tooth and the crown, resulting in a greater film thickness of luting cement, which may benefit from the stronger, tougher and less soluble packable glass ionomer rather than the conventional glass ionomer cement for cementation of zirconia crowns.
There is no clear evidence whether it's better to cement zirconia based crowns with conventional or adhesive cement; and to the investigator's knowledge, there is no data available for the best clinical practice in cementation of zirconia pediatric crowns; and so, this study was carried out to compare the effectiveness of bio-active cement with packable glass ionomer when used for cementation of zirconia pediatric crowns.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bio-active cement
Bio-active cement dispensed into the crown, and the crown was properly positioned over the tooth, cement was allowed to self-set for 20 seconds while maintaining gentle pressure on the crown, then flash cured using a light curing unit to remove excess cement, buccal and lingual surfaces were light cured for extra 10 seconds each.
Bio-active cement
A cement used for crown cementation, specially recommended for pediatric esthetic crowns
Packable glass ionomer
Dentin conditioner was applied to the prepared crown surfaces for 20 sec, then rinsed, and dried. Capsule was activated, mixed for 10 seconds in an amalgamator, then loaded into the capsule applier to extrude cement directly into the crown, the crown was properly positioned over the tooth, cement was allowed to self-set for 2 minutes while maintaining gentle pressure on the crown, excess cement was removed before complete setting of cement.
Packable glass ionomer
Glass ionomer cement with improved mechanical properties usually used for restoration of simple small cavities and in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bio-active cement
A cement used for crown cementation, specially recommended for pediatric esthetic crowns
Packable glass ionomer
Glass ionomer cement with improved mechanical properties usually used for restoration of simple small cavities and in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Presence of sound tooth structure at the cervical margins of the teeth.
3. Presence of opposing functioning teeth.
4. Included teeth should be assessed clinically as free from active pulpal or periodontal conditions.
5. Patient must be in general good health, with no medical contraindication to dental treatment.
6. Patient must be available for required recalls as outlined in the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with untreated periodontal disease.
3. Patients with any pathological or systemic problems that would not allow the dental procedures in this study to take place.
4. Teeth that exhibit mobility.
5. Patients that show signs of severe bruxism or teeth clenching.
6. Subjects with deleterious oral habits like pencil/pen chewing.
7. Uncooperative patients.
4 Years
7 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fayoum University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maha Moussa Azab
Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Zirconia crowns cementation
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.