Modeling Clinical Failure in Prostate Cancer Patients Based on a Two-stage Statistical Model

NCT ID: NCT03979079

Last Updated: 2021-01-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2384 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Biomarker series can indicate disease progression and predict clinical endpoints. When a treatment is prescribed depending on the biomarker, confounding by indication might be introduced if the treatment modifies the marker profile and risk of failure.

The two-stage model fitted within a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo framework is particularly flexible to account for such data. Prostate-specific antigens in prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy can be monitored. In the presence of rising prostate-specific antigens after external beam radiation therapy, salvage hormone therapy can be prescribed to reduce both the prostate-specific antigens concentration and the risk of clinical failure, an illustration of confounding by indication. The prognostic value of hormone therapy and prostate-specific antigens trajectory on the risk of failure based on a two-stage model within a Bayesian framework to assess the role of the prostate-specific antigens profile on clinical failure while accounting for a secondary treatment prescribed by indication. the aim of this research is to model prostate specific antigens using a hierarchical piecewise linear trajectory with a random changepoint. Residual prostate-specific antigens variability can be expressed as a function of prostate-specific antigens concentration. Covariates in the survival model can include : hormone therapy, baseline characteristics, and individual predictions of the prostate-specific antigens nadir and timing and prostate-specific antigens slopes before and after the nadir as provided by the longitudinal process.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The two-stage modeling approach allows estimation of the regression coefficients in a time-dependent Cox model, while addressing the limitations with the knowledge of the true marker trajectory. In the first stage, the longitudinal process is modeled using a repeated measures component model, such as a random effects model. In the second stage, estimated characteristics of the longitudinal marker trajectory, such as slopes, are included as covariates in a survival model to assess their prognostic value.

Our aim was to highlight the flexibility of a two-stage model fitted within a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework. We applied this model to assess the prognostic value of the prostate-specific antigens (PSA) profile (level and timing of the nadir; pre- and post-nadir slopes) as well as salvage hormonal treatment (HT) on the risk of clinical failure following external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the presence of confounding by indication. We first present the longitudinal hierarchical PSA model that we developed earlier. This model was particularly flexible since it allowed us to account for the presence of a random changepoint as well as the modeling of the residual variability as a function of the PSA concentration. We next extend the longitudinal model to a two-stage model by using estimated parameters of the longitudinal process as covariates in a Cox proportional hazards model to assess prognostic factors of clinical failure including baseline characteristics, PSA trajectory, and HT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

external beam radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinically localized prostate cancer
* Clinical stage T1 to T4
* Node and metastasis negative
* Treated with external beam radiation therapy (RT).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with baseline or planned hormonotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut Bergonié

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carine Bellera, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Bergonié

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

INSERM

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bellera C, Proust-Lima C, Joseph L, Richaud P, Taylor J, Sandler H, Hanley J, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. A two-stage model in a Bayesian framework to estimate a survival endpoint in the presence of confounding by indication. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1271-1281. doi: 10.1177/0962280216660127. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27587597 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IB2010-PREDYC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.