Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage I or Stage II Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00002703
Last Updated: 2013-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
390 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1996-01-31
2005-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of conventional radiation therapy with high-dose radiation therapy in treating men with stage I or stage II prostate cancer.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OUTLINE: Randomized study. Arm I: Radiotherapy. Boost to the prostate using high-LET protons followed by irradiation of the prostate, periprostatic tissues, and seminal vesicles using conformal photons with energies greater than 6 MV. Conventional dose. Arm II: Radiotherapy. As in Arm I. High dose.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: There will be 390 patients accrued into this study over 3 years. An additional 3.5 years will be required for follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
TREATMENT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
high-LET heavy ion therapy
low-LET photon therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Any age Performance status: Karnofsky 70%-100% Life expectancy: Greater than 10 years Other: No major medical or psychiatric illness that precludes protocol entry No prior or concurrent second malignancy within 5 years except basal cell skin cancer
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior treatment for prostate cancer
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Proton Radiation Oncology Group
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anthony L. Zietman, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Coen JJ, Zietman AL, Rossi CJ, Grocela JA, Efstathiou JA, Yan Y, Shipley WU. Comparison of high-dose proton radiotherapy and brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer: a case-matched analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.039. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Nguyen PL, Chen RC, Hoffman KE, Trofimov A, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, Shipley WU, Zietman AL, Talcott JA. Rectal dose-volume histogram parameters are associated with long-term patient-reported gastrointestinal quality of life after conventional and high-dose radiation for prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Nov 15;78(4):1081-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.015. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, Bush DA, Lunt M, Spiegel DY, Skowronski R, Jabola BR, Rossi CJ. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8475. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Rossi CJ, Zietman AL, DeSilvio M, et al.: A randomized trial comparing conventional dose (70.2GyE) and high-dose (79.2GyE) conformal radiation in early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of an interim analysis of PROG 95-09. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2005 Prostate Cancer Symposium, 17-19 February 2005, Orlando, Florida. A-58, 2005.
Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, Rossi CJ Jr, Miller DW, Adams JA, Shipley WU. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1233.
Zietman AL, DeSilvio M, Slater JD, et al.: A randomized trial comparing conventional dose (70.2GyE) and high-dose (79. 2GyE) conformal radiation in early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: results of an interim analysis of PROG 95-09. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (Suppl 1): A-4, S131, 2004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PROG-9509
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000064503
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id