The Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a Measure of Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerate Disc Disease.
NCT ID: NCT03977961
Last Updated: 2022-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-01
2020-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Muscle Function and Pelvic Stability While Walking in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03951935
Validity and Reliability of the 2-minute Walk Test in Individuals With a Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04555759
Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Real-World Functional Activity
NCT05611775
Upper Limb Activity in Human SCI Rehabilitation
NCT02098122
Validity and Reliability of 6-minute Pegboard and Ring Test
NCT06943040
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Objectives The primary objective is to determine the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD)
Secondary objectives are
1. to correlate objective functional impairment (OFI) with already established patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) in the sense of cross-validation.
2. To correlate OFI, as determined by the 6MWT with OFI that is determined by another objective test, the TUG test
3. to then analyze the change in OFI in patients before and after surgical intervention
4. to determine whether patients prefer the objective (6MWT) or subjective (PROMs) repeated assessment of their functional condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DDD Patients
All patients presenting to the neurosurgical department of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG) with a diagnosed DDD fulfilling the inclusion criteria and scheduled for surgery will be considered for this study.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and Female subjects ≥ 18 years
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to walk (extreme pain or severe neurological deficits)
* Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD) corresponding to ≥ Gold III
* Severe heart failure corresponding to ≥ New York Heart Association (NYHA) III
* Lung cancer and diffuse parenchymal lung disease
* Other medical reasons interfering with the patient's ability to walk and perform the 6MWT (e.g., osteoarthritis disease of the lower extremities, Parkinson's disease, heart failure, hip or knee prosthesis etc.)
* Unavailability for follow up and/or inability to complete assessment (planning to move, no smartphone, etc.).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Dr. Astrid Weyerbrock, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Kantonsspital St. Gallen
UNKNOWN
PD Dr. med. Martin Stienen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich
UNKNOWN
Dr. med. Peter Prömmel, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Kantonsspital St. Gallen
UNKNOWN
PD Dr. med. Oliver Gautschi, Neuro- und Wirbelsäulen Zentrum Zentral-schweiz, Luzern
UNKNOWN
med. pract. Markéta Sosnová, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Kantonsspital St. Gallen
UNKNOWN
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolai Maldaner
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicolai Maldaner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Neurosurgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kantonsspital St. Gallen / Department of Neurosurgery
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ziga M, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Ratliff JK, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2023 Sep;23(9):1314-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 13.
Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Gautschi OP, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Distance to first symptoms measured by the 6-min walking test differentiates between treatment success and failure in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):596-603. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07103-9. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Smartphone-based 6-minute Walking Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Sep 15;46(18):E959-E965. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003991.
Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Zeitlberger AM, Bozinov O, Gautschi OP, Weyerbrock A, Regli L, Stienen MN. External Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed-up-and-go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Feb 15;47(4):337-342. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004128.
Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M, Gautschi OP, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN. Responsiveness of the self-measured 6-minute walking test and the Timed Up and Go test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 May 7;35(1):52-59. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201621. Epub 2021 May 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6MWT DDD - 1.0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.