Spinal Cord Injury: Endurance, Strength and Cardiac Function Induced by Efficient Training Protocols
NCT ID: NCT00987155
Last Updated: 2017-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-01-31
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. Comparison of sub-maximal and peak VO2 values during arm crank (ACE) and wheelchair ergometry (WCE) in persons with spinal cord injury. The hypothesis is that wheelchair propulsion due to higher energy expenditure show higher work output and VO2peak than ACE.
3. Does 6 weeks of maximal strength training improve SCI subjects performance during WCE? WCE after 6 weeks maximal strength training is less strenuous owing to better work economy/ efficiency.
4. Effect from aerobic high intensity hybrid training on stroke volume (SV) and VO2peak in spinal cord injured men.
8 weeks of high intensity 4 times 4 interval training at 85-90% of peak heart rate during hybrid cycling. Hypothesis; VO2peak and SV will be significantly increased from training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
VO2peak and Exercise Efficiency in Upper-body Poling
NCT03284086
Intervention Study to Assess the Effects of Moderate and High Intensity Aerobic Training on Physical Capacity and Activity Level in Persons With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
NCT01903226
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Arm Bike for Cardiovascular Recovery in SCI
NCT06313515
Living With Spinal Cord Injury.
NCT03709732
Effect of Upper-body Rowing on Cardiometabolic Risk in Spinal Cord Injured Wheelchair Users
NCT04390087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
high intensity interval training
8 weeks of high intensity 4 times 4 interval training at 85-90% of peak heart rate during hybrid cycling
Ergometry
MetamaxII Cortex ergospirometry system (Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Germany). Arm cycling ergometer (Ergomed 840L, Siemens, GermanyMonark, Sweden), Electrically braked wheelchair ergometer (VP 100, Handisoft France)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ergometry
MetamaxII Cortex ergospirometry system (Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Germany). Arm cycling ergometer (Ergomed 840L, Siemens, GermanyMonark, Sweden), Electrically braked wheelchair ergometer (VP 100, Handisoft France)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be able to tolerate direct current stimulation in the means of FES
* Living in Health region IV and V, Norway.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known cancer
* Known pregnancy
* Severe autonomic dysreflexia
* Gross contractures
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gunnar Leivseth, Professor MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan Normal University
Gisle Meyer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
St. Olavs Hospital
Lars Jacob Stovner, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
National Taiwan Normal University
Jan Hoff, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan Normal University
Berit Brurok, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Olavs Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Olav University Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Torhaug T, Brurok B, Hoff J, Helgerud J, Leivseth G. Arm Crank and Wheelchair Ergometry Produce Similar Peak Oxygen Uptake but Different Work Economy Values in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5481843. doi: 10.1155/2016/5481843. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4.2007.2271
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.