Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastatic Tumors

NCT ID: NCT03963713

Last Updated: 2019-07-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-10

Study Completion Date

2022-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Data of 100 patients with spinal metastatic tumor who received stereotactic radiotherapy or conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the multi-center of the research group from July 2019 to June 2021 will be collected, as well as their follow-up data.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, Data of 100 patients with spinal metastatic tumor who received stereotactic radiotherapy or conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the multi-center of the research group from July 2019 to June 2021 will be collected, as well as their follow-up data.The metastases were treated with SBRT.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).The metastases were treated with Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiotherapy Spine Metastases Radiosurgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

non-randomized trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stereotactic radiotherapy

In this study, the metastases were treated with Stereotactic radiotherapy(SBRT).Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).

Stereotactic radiotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stereotactic radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).

Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated

In this study, the metastases were treated with Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stereotactic radiotherapy

Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).

Intervention Type RADIATION

Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy

Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-80 years old;
* Spine metastatic tumor patients confirmed by pathology and imaging; Number 3; Surgical treatment is not possible due to iatrogenic or (and) personal factors;
* Spinal metastasis after previous systemic treatment or progression after previous treatment of spinal metastasis;
* The anatomy of the spinal metastases form Tomita parting Ⅰ type - Ⅲ type; Without systemic metastasis or metastasis, the lesion was controlled.
* ECOG physical condition score: 0-1, Karnofsky score 60, able to withstand puncture;
* Expected survival 3 months;
* Main organ function is good, without serious hypertension, diabetes and heart disease.
* Has signed informed consent;
* The compliance was good and the family members agreed to follow up for survival.

Exclusion Criteria

* Of the anatomy of the spinal metastases form Tomita classification: Ⅳ, Ⅴ Ⅵ, Ⅶ.
* Participated in other drug clinical trials within four weeks; There was a history of bleeding, and any bleeding event with severe grade of CTCAE5.0 or above occurred within 4 weeks before screening;
* Screening of patients with known central nervous system metastasis or a history of central nervous system metastasis. For patients with clinical suspected central nervous system metastasis, CT or MRI examination must be performed within 14 days before randomization to exclude central nervous system metastasis.
* Patients with hypertension who cannot obtain good control by single antihypertensive drug treatment (systolic blood pressure \>140mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>90mmHg); Having a history of unstable angina pectoris; Patients newly diagnosed with angina within 3 months before screening or myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening; Arrhythmia (including QTcF: 450ms in male and 470ms in female) requires long-term use of anti-arrhythmia drugs and New York heart association grade II cardiac dysfunction;
* Long-term unhealed wounds or incomplete fracture healing;
* Imaging showed that the tumor had invaded important blood vessels or the researchers judged that the patient's tumor had a very high possibility to invade important blood vessels during the treatment and cause fatal bleeding;
* Coagulation function is unusual, have haemorrhage tendency person (before random 14 days must satisfy: below the circumstance that does not use anticoagulant INR is in normal value range); Patients treated with anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, heparin or their analogues; The use of low-dose warfarin (1mg oral, once daily) or low-dose aspirin (no more than 100mg daily) for preventive purposes is permitted on the premise that the international standardized ratio of prothrombin time (INR) is 1.5;
* Screening for the occurrence of hyperactive/venous thrombosis events in the first 6 months, such as cerebrovascular accidents (including temporary ischemic attack), deep vein thrombosis (except for venous thrombosis caused by intravenous catheterization in the early stage of chemotherapy, which was determined by the researchers to have recovered) and pulmonary embolism, etc.
* Thyroid function was abnormal in the past and could not be kept within the normal range even in the case of drug treatment.

(10) Attending has a history of psychotropic drug abuse, and can't attend or has mental disorder;
* Always half a year after spinal tumors or other close to the spine tumor lesion lesions radiation;
* Immunodeficiency disease, or has other acquired, congenital immunodeficiency disease, or has a history of organ transplantation;
* Judgment according to the researchers, there is serious to endanger the safety of patients or patients completed the research associated with disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mianyang Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Qingdao chengyang hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Qingdao Hiser Medical Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing 302 Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangxi Ruikang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Gem Flower Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tang-Du Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Junjie Wang, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Peking University Third Hospital

Fei Xu, M Med

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Hongqing Zhuang, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Xiaobo Du, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mianyang Central Hospital

Jie Li, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mianyang Central Hospital

Xiang Song, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Lei Zhang, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Jianguo Zhang, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Qingdao chengyang people's hospital

Peng Liu, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Qingdao Hiser Medical Group

Xuezhang Duan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beijing 302 Hospital

Zuping Lian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guangxi Ruikang Hospital

Liang Liu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University

Longhai Shen, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Panjin Liaohe Oilfield Gem Flower Hospital

Dongjie He, M Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tang-Du Hospital

Xuemin Li, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Yi Chen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University Third Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

The fifth medical center of PLA general hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Guangxi ruikang hospital

Nanning, Guangxi, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Third Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University

Guiyang, Guizhou, China

Site Status RECRUITING

GEM flower hospital of Liaohe oil field Tang-Du Hospital

Panjin, Liaoning, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Hiser Medical Center of Qingdao

Qingdao, Shandong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Qingdao chengyang people's hospital

Qingdao, Shandong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Second hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Tangdu hospital

Xian, Shanxi, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Mianyang Central Hospital

Mianyang, Sichuan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Junjie Wang, MD

Role: CONTACT

+860182264910

Fei Xu, M Med

Role: CONTACT

+8618511866032

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Junjie Wang, MD

Role: primary

+8682264910

Fei Xu, M Med

Role: backup

+8618511866032

XueZhang Duan, M Med

Role: primary

ZuPing Lian, M Med

Role: primary

Liang Liu, M D

Role: primary

Longhai Shen, M Med

Role: primary

Peng Liu, M Med

Role: primary

JanGuo Zhang, M Med

Role: primary

Xiang Song, M Med

Role: primary

DongJie He, M Med

Role: primary

Xiaobo Du, MD

Role: primary

+8613550822229

Jie Li, M Med

Role: backup

+8615228324561

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Massicotte E, Foote M, Reddy R, Sahgal A. Minimal access spine surgery (MASS) for decompression and stabilization performed as an out-patient procedure for metastatic spinal tumours followed by spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): first report of technique and preliminary outcomes. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;11(1):15-25. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500230.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22181327 (View on PubMed)

Sahgal A, Whyne CM, Ma L, Larson DA, Fehlings MG. Vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):e310-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70101-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23816297 (View on PubMed)

Rades D, Stalpers LJ, Veninga T, Schulte R, Hoskin PJ, Obralic N, Bajrovic A, Rudat V, Schwarz R, Hulshof MC, Poortmans P, Schild SE. Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3366-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.754.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15908648 (View on PubMed)

Gong Y, Wang J, Bai S, Jiang X, Xu F. Conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT): a safe and effective treatment for cancer spinal metastasis. Radiat Oncol. 2008 Apr 22;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-3-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18426607 (View on PubMed)

Guckenberger M, Goebel J, Wilbert J, Baier K, Richter A, Sweeney RA, Bratengeier K, Flentje M. Clinical outcome of dose-escalated image-guided radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 1;75(3):828-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19250762 (View on PubMed)

Zhang M, Chen YR, Chang SD, Veeravagu A. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: a single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jan;42(1):E13. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16372.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28041316 (View on PubMed)

Gandhidasan S, Ball D, Kron T, Bressel M, Shaw M, Chu J, Chander S, Wheeler G, Plumridge N, Chesson B, David S, Siva S. Single Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastasis: Outcomes from 132 Consecutive Patients. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Mar;30(3):178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29224900 (View on PubMed)

Ryu S, Rock J, Rosenblum M, Kim JH. Patterns of failure after single-dose radiosurgery for spinal metastasis. J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101 Suppl 3:402-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15537196 (View on PubMed)

Chang EL, Shiu AS, Mendel E, Mathews LA, Mahajan A, Allen PK, Weinberg JS, Brown BW, Wang XS, Woo SY, Cleeland C, Maor MH, Rhines LD. Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Aug;7(2):151-60. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/08/151.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17688054 (View on PubMed)

Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, Welch WC. Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):193-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251863.76595.a2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17224814 (View on PubMed)

Wowra B, Zausinger S, Drexler C, Kufeld M, Muacevic A, Staehler M, Tonn JC. CyberKnife radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors: characterization of well-suited patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2929-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818c680a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19092627 (View on PubMed)

Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Bone Metastases; Lo SS, Lutz ST, Chang EL, Galanopoulos N, Howell DD, Kim EY, Konski AA, Pandit-Taskar ND, Rose PS, Ryu S, Silverman LN, Sloan AE, Van Poznak C. ACR Appropriateness Criteria (R) spinal bone metastases. J Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;16(1):9-19. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0376. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23167547 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BYSY-CKIMRT-SPNALM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal met_radiosurgery/SBRT Study
NCT01231061 COMPLETED PHASE2