Image-guided and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Versus External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Spine Metastases

NCT ID: NCT02832830

Last Updated: 2016-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this explorative trial is to verify the comparability of a fractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy with a conventional radiotherapy related to quality of life on the one hand and to evaluate toxicity, re-calcification and stability of vertebral body as well as pain relief and local response for palliative patients with painful spinal bone metastases on the other hand. This is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial with parallel-group design to determine the quality of life after RT in patients with spinal bone metastases. Two different techniques were evaluated: intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and fractionated conventional external beam RT with 10×3 Gy each.

Experimental intervention:

IMRT 10 x 3 Gy

Control intervention:

3D-RT 10 x 3 Gy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this explorative trial is to verify the comparability of a fractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy with a conventional radiotherapy related to quality of life on the one hand and to evaluate toxicity, re-calcification and stability of vertebral body as well as pain relief and local response for palliative patients with painful spinal bone metastases on the other hand. This is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial with parallel-group design to determine the quality of life after RT in patients with spinal bone metastases. Two different techniques were evaluated: intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and fractionated conventional external beam RT with 10×3 Gy each.

Experimental intervention:

IMRT 10 x 3 Gy

Control intervention:

3D-RT 10 x 3 Gy After the baseline measurements have been recorded, the patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups: IMRT 10×3 Gy (n = 30) or fractionated conventional 3D-RT 10×3 Gy (n = 30). The RT will be applied daily (mondy to Friday).

Follow-up per patient:

The target parameters will be measured and recorded at baseline, at the end of RT (t1), and at 12 weeks (t2) and 6 months (t3) after the end of the irradiation period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vertebral Bony Metastases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) 10 x 3 Gy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

IMRT

Intervention Type RADIATION

Intensity modulated Raiotherapy (IMRT) of the involved spinal bone metastasis

B

fractionated conventional external beam RT 10×3 Gy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

fractionated RT

Intervention Type RADIATION

external beam Radiotherapy of the involved spinal bone metastasis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IMRT

Intensity modulated Raiotherapy (IMRT) of the involved spinal bone metastasis

Intervention Type RADIATION

fractionated RT

external beam Radiotherapy of the involved spinal bone metastasis

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a histologically confirmed tumor diagnosis and with secondary diagnosed solitary/multiple spinal bone metastases
* Indication for RT of the spinal bone metastases
* Age of between 18 and 85 years
* Karnofsky index of at least 50
* Signed declaration of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Lymphoma
* Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including dementia and epileptic seizures
* Previous RT at the current irradiation site
* Other severe disorders that in the judgment of the study director may prevent the patient's participation in the study
* Lacking or diminished legal capacity
* Any medical of psychological condition that the study director considers a preventive factor for the patient's ability to complete the study or to adequately understand the scope of the study and to give his or her consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Heidelberg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Heidelberg, Germany, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Harald Rief, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Jürgen Debus, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chung Y, Yoon HI, Kim JH, Nam KC, Koom WS. Is helical tomotherapy accurate and safe enough for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;139(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1321-0. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23052695 (View on PubMed)

Katsoulakis E, Riaz N, Cox B, Mechalakos J, Zatcky J, Bilsky M, Yamada Y. Delivering a third course of radiation to spine metastases using image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):63-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12433. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23101946 (View on PubMed)

Murai T, Murata R, Manabe Y, Sugie C, Tamura T, Ito H, Miyoshi Y, Shibamoto Y. Intensity modulated stereotactic body radiation therapy for single or multiple vertebral metastases with spinal cord compression. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov-Dec;4(6):e231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25407874 (View on PubMed)

Wu JS, Wong R, Johnston M, Bezjak A, Whelan T; Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative Supportive Care Group. Meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 1;55(3):594-605. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04147-0.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12573746 (View on PubMed)

Sprave T, Verma V, Forster R, Schlampp I, Hees K, Bruckner T, Bostel T, El Shafie RA, Welzel T, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Rief H. Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial. Radiat Oncol. 2018 Oct 30;13(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1161-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30376859 (View on PubMed)

Meyerhof E, Sprave T, Welte SE, Nicolay NH, Forster R, Bostel T, Bruckner T, Schlampp I, Debus J, Rief H. Radiation-induced toxicity after image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases (IRON-1): a study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. Trials. 2017 Mar 3;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1847-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28253920 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRON-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kypho-IORT vs. EBRT in Spinal Metastases
NCT02773966 TERMINATED PHASE3
Spinal met_radiosurgery/SBRT Study
NCT01231061 COMPLETED PHASE2