Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases

NCT ID: NCT02512965

Last Updated: 2024-02-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

229 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-04

Study Completion Date

2021-08-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to find out if SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain in the spine 3 months after receiving treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research is being done because while there is some evidence suggesting that SBRT may improve treatment for patients with spine metastases, more research is needed to determine if it is better than CRT. The first part of the randomized trial (phase II) looked at whether it was possible (feasible) to provide these treatments in cancer centres across Canada, by aiming to recruit 54 participants within 18 months. This part of the study was successfully completed in early 2017. The second component of this study, called a randomized phase III trial, is now underway. It involves recruiting another 124 participants to receive either CRT or SBRT, using the same study procedure as in the feasibility study. We will continue to obtain information about whether SBRT is better than CRT at controlling pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Metastases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Conventional Radiotherapy

Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

20 Gy in 5 fractions

Intervention Type RADIATION

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions

Intervention Type RADIATION

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

20 Gy in 5 fractions

Intervention Type RADIATION

Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of cancer (excluding seminoma, small cell lung cancer and hematologic primaries).
* Spinal metastasis documented with MRI and suitable for treatment with radiotherapy with the following characteristics:

* Painful, as defined by a pain score ≥ 2 for worst pain in the planned target treatment volume;
* ≤ 3 consecutive spinal segments involved by tumour to be included in the planned target volume. The patient may have other spinal metaastases to be treated as per the radiation oncologist's discretion, but the eligible spinal metastatic site has to be one where there is pain and no more than 3 consecutive segments to be included as clinical target volume and appropriate for either 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 24 Gy in 2 fractions per the randomization.
* There is no plan to change the pain medication on the first day of protocol treatment with radiotherapy.
* ECOG Performance Status 0-2.
* Seen by a radiation oncologist and judged to be appropriate for participation in this study including ability to tolerate protocol radiotherapy (SBRT or CRT).
* Age of 18 years or older.
* Patient is able and willing to complete the Patient Diary (pain and analgesic use).
* Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaire in either English or French. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines, prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible.
* Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrollment in the trial to document their willingness to participate.
* Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.
* In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 3 weeks of patient randomization. From the time of successful treatment planning, no more than 12 days can elapse before the first fraction of radiotherapy is delivered.
* Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.
* Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have a pacemaker, such that MRI cannot be performed or treatment cannot be delivered safely.
* Patients with prior treatment with any radionuclide within 30 days prior to randomization.
* Patients with prior radiation to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy such that the protocol therapy cannot be delivered as intended.
* Patients with prior surgery to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy.
* Patients who have received chemotherapy within 1 week prior to administration of protocol radiotherapy or who are expected/planned to receive chemotherapy within one week of completing protocol radiotherapy. Centre guidelines regarding administration of targeted non-cytotoxic therapy must be followed with the proviso that no systemic anticancer therapy should be administered within 24 hours prior to and post-radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy may be administered during radiotherapy as per the discretion of the treating physician.
* Patients with spine instability as judged by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of more than 12.
* Patients with symptomatic spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome resulting from bony compression or epidural compression of the spinal cord and cauda equina, respectively. Symptomatic refers to neurolic deficit in the form of motor, bowel or bladder dysfunction.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Cancer Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arjun Sahgal

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto ON

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Auckland City Hospital

Grafton, Aucklund, Australia

Site Status

Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Peter McCallum Cancer Institute

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Peter Mac - Sunshine Hospital

St Albans, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Canberra Hospital

Garran, , Australia

Site Status

Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital

Herston, , Australia

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BCCA - Centre for the North

Prince George, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Regional Cancer Program

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Odette Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34126044 (View on PubMed)

Tseng CL, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Lee YK, Ruschin M, Atenafu EG, Campbell M, Maralani P, Yang V, Yee A, Sahgal A. Imaging-Based Outcomes for 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions for Patients with de Novo Spinal Metastases Treated With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 1;102(3):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.047. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30003994 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SC24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.