Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases
NCT ID: NCT02512965
Last Updated: 2024-02-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
229 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-04
2021-08-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Spinal/Para-Spinal Metastases (Spine SBRT)
NCT01290562
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases
NCT06391242
Comparing SBRT to CRT in Patients With Spinal Metastases
NCT05589701
Randomized Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Conventional Radiation for Spine Metastasis
NCT01525745
A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) vs Conventional Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases
NCT06065449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Conventional Radiotherapy
Standard Conventional Radiotherapy (CRT) 20 Gy in 5 fractions
20 Gy in 5 fractions
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) 24 Gy in 2 fractions
Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
20 Gy in 5 fractions
Conventional SBRT: 24 Gy in 2 fractions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Spinal metastasis documented with MRI and suitable for treatment with radiotherapy with the following characteristics:
* Painful, as defined by a pain score ≥ 2 for worst pain in the planned target treatment volume;
* ≤ 3 consecutive spinal segments involved by tumour to be included in the planned target volume. The patient may have other spinal metaastases to be treated as per the radiation oncologist's discretion, but the eligible spinal metastatic site has to be one where there is pain and no more than 3 consecutive segments to be included as clinical target volume and appropriate for either 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 24 Gy in 2 fractions per the randomization.
* There is no plan to change the pain medication on the first day of protocol treatment with radiotherapy.
* ECOG Performance Status 0-2.
* Seen by a radiation oncologist and judged to be appropriate for participation in this study including ability to tolerate protocol radiotherapy (SBRT or CRT).
* Age of 18 years or older.
* Patient is able and willing to complete the Patient Diary (pain and analgesic use).
* Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the quality of life questionnaire in either English or French. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines, prior to randomization. Inability (illiteracy in English or French, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the questionnaires will make the patient ineligible.
* Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each patient must sign a consent form prior to enrollment in the trial to document their willingness to participate.
* Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves the patients randomized on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, adverse events, and follow-up.
* In accordance with CCTG policy, protocol treatment is to begin within 3 weeks of patient randomization. From the time of successful treatment planning, no more than 12 days can elapse before the first fraction of radiotherapy is delivered.
* Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.
* Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with prior treatment with any radionuclide within 30 days prior to randomization.
* Patients with prior radiation to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy such that the protocol therapy cannot be delivered as intended.
* Patients with prior surgery to the spinal segment intended to be treated with protocol radiotherapy.
* Patients who have received chemotherapy within 1 week prior to administration of protocol radiotherapy or who are expected/planned to receive chemotherapy within one week of completing protocol radiotherapy. Centre guidelines regarding administration of targeted non-cytotoxic therapy must be followed with the proviso that no systemic anticancer therapy should be administered within 24 hours prior to and post-radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy may be administered during radiotherapy as per the discretion of the treating physician.
* Patients with spine instability as judged by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of more than 12.
* Patients with symptomatic spinal cord compression or cauda equina syndrome resulting from bony compression or epidural compression of the spinal cord and cauda equina, respectively. Symptomatic refers to neurolic deficit in the form of motor, bowel or bladder dysfunction.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
OTHER
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arjun Sahgal
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto ON
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Auckland City Hospital
Grafton, Aucklund, Australia
Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Peter McCallum Cancer Institute
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Peter Mac - Sunshine Hospital
St Albans, Victoria, Australia
Canberra Hospital
Garran, , Australia
Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital
Herston, , Australia
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
BCCA - Centre for the North
Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Regional Cancer Program
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, Masucci GL, Maralani PJ, Brundage M, Butler J, Chow E, Fehlings MG, Foote M, Gabos Z, Greenspoon J, Kerba M, Lee Y, Liu M, Liu SK, Thibault I, Wong RK, Hum M, Ding K, Parulekar WR; trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00196-0. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
Tseng CL, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Lee YK, Ruschin M, Atenafu EG, Campbell M, Maralani P, Yang V, Yee A, Sahgal A. Imaging-Based Outcomes for 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions for Patients with de Novo Spinal Metastases Treated With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 1;102(3):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.047. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SC24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.