Separation Surgery Followed by Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) Versus SABR Alone for Spinal Metastases

NCT ID: NCT06613295

Last Updated: 2024-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-07

Study Completion Date

2027-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

The primary objective of the project is investigating the effect of SABR compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with MESCC on retaining ambulatory function. The primary endpoint of the study is ambulatory function 3 months post treatment defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid; being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …); not being able to walk. Secondary outcomes are local control, progression free survival, early and late adverse effects, quality of life, effect on pain and need for reintervention.

The aim is to randomise 128 patients 1:1 to either "separation surgery" followed by SABR (5x 8.0 Gy postoperative) (control arm) vs. SABR alone (5x 8.0 Gy) (study arm).

Patients will be evaluated at 3 and 6 months after treatment with MRI scan, quality of life questionnaires, anamnestic and clinical evaluation at clinical follow ups for assessment of ambulatory function, acute and late toxicity and need for reintervention. Moreover, at 6 weeks, 12 months and 24 months after treatment a teleconsult for assessment of ambulatory function, and need for reintervention will be performed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), Bilsky grade 1c, 2 and 3 who are ambulatory with or without aid (rollator, cane, one persons help) will be treated by separation surgery followed by SABR (5x 8.0 Gy postoperative) (control arm) or SABR alone (5x 8.0 Gy) (study arm). The primary objective of the study is investigating the effect of SABR compared to separation surgery followed by SABR in ambulatory patients with MESCC on retaining ambulatory function. The primary endpoint of the study is ambulatory function 3 months post treatment defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid; being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …); not being able to walk. Secondary outcomes are local control, progression free survival, early and late adverse effects, quality of life, effect on pain and need for reintervention.

For each participant, the study starts once written informed consent is provided and is composed by 4 study phases: a screening phase, randomisation, a treatment phase and a follow-up phase.

The screening phase will allow for assessment of subject eligibility before randomisation and treatment. Demographic data, disease and spinal metastases characteristics and previous anticancer therapies will be recorded. Once all screening procedures are completed, eligibility will be determined according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Randomisation will be performed in a 1:1 ratio to the control arm (separation surgery followed by SABR) and the study arm (SABR) using an electronic randomisation tool in the eCRF.

Treatment will be aimed to start as soon as possible, but certainly within 21 days after randomisation (surgery or upfront SABR). Surgical planning is done by the treating neurosurgeon in the participating center where the patient was included. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy.

At 6 weeks (+/-1 week) after the last RT session following information will be obtained (preferentially by digital consult):

1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …), not being able to walk
2. WHO performance status
3. Acute and late toxicity assessment: as measured with CTCAE version 5.0
4. Need for re-intervention, date and type of reintervention (surgery or radiotherapy), reason (wound infection, neurologic decline, loss of ability to walk or other)
5. Pain response: VAS pain score
6. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death)

At 3 and 6 months (+/-3 weeks) after the last RT session following information will be obtained by physical or digital consult:

1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …), not being able to walk
2. WHO performance status
3. Concomitant medications and systemic anticancer therapies
4. QoL according to the EORTC QLQ-C15 \& BM22 questionnaires
5. Acute and late toxicity assessment: as measured with CTCAE version 5.0

7\. Need for re-intervention, date and type of reintervention (surgery or radiotherapy), reason (wound infection, neurologic decline, loss of ability to walk or other) 6. Pain response: VAS pain score 7. Physical examination: body weight 8. Local control 9. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death)

At 12 and 24 months (+/-3 weeks) after the last RT session following information will be obtained (preferentially by digital consult):

1. Ambulatory status defined as: being able to walk 10m without aid, being able to walk 10m with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help, …), not being able to walk
2. Need for re-intervention, type of reintervention
3. Survival data (survival status, date of death, primary cause of death)
4. Local control (only if information is available in medical record as per standard of care)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Solid Tumor Spinal Neoplasms Spinal Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Separation surgery followed by stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

Surgery will take place within 21 days after randomisation. Surgical planning is done by the treating neurosurgeon in the participating center where the patient was included. The goal of separation surgery for intraspinal MESCC is to remove intraspinal epidural disease to allow a margin between the spinal cord (or cauda equina) and the treated radiotherapy volume, and to provide histological diagnosis or confirmation of the metastasis. The decompression should be as minimal invasive as possible, i.e. only intraspinal tumour tissue should be removed, while preserving as much as possible all of surrounding spinal structures. Separation surgery must be followed by SABR after minimum 2 and maximum 4 weeks postoperatively. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SABR

Intervention Type RADIATION

SABR

Separation surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Separation surgery

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

SABR will start within 21 days of randomisation. Image-guided fractionated SABR using a SIB technique to the high-dose PTV will be delivered in 5 fractions of 8 Gy to a total of 40 Gy and to the conventional-dose PTV delivered simultaneously in 5 fractions of 4 Gy to a total of 20 Gy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SABR

Intervention Type RADIATION

SABR

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SABR

SABR

Intervention Type RADIATION

Separation surgery

Separation surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of a solid malignant tumour (preferentially histologically proven;alternatively obtained by spinal surgical procedure)
* Age 18 years or older
* Histological, radiological or scintigraphical evidence of spinal metastasis (no limitation in the number of sites of metastases)
* Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) \<13 (i.e. no need for stabilisation of the spine) (see Appendix 6)
* Spinal metastasis with MESCC: ESCC grade 1c, 2 and 3 (see Appendix 7)
* Ambulatory: being able to walk 10m without aid or with aid (cane, rollator, one persons help).
* Life expectancy estimated to be at least 3 months.
* World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status of 0-2 (some help) (see Appendix 3)
* Patient has given written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Contra indication for MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker)
* Previous RT or surgery at the level of the affected vertebrae
* Non-solid primary tumours (e.g. lymphoma, multiple myeloma, germ cell tumours)
* Non ambulatory at presentation
* More than 3 affected vertebrae in one target site
* More than 2 treatment sites
* SINS ≥ 13 (unstable spine)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cancer Research Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ZAS Augustinus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

OLVZ Aalst

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

AZ Klina

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

UZA

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

ZOL

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Jessa

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

AZ Groeninge

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

AZ Sint-Maarten

Mechelen, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

VITAZ

Sint-Niklaas, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

GZA

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Charlotte Billiet, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

03234433759

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Samuel Bral, MD

Role: primary

053728656 ext. 32

Samuel Bral

Role: backup

Ruben Van Den Brande, MD

Role: primary

036505092 ext. 32

Ruben Van Den Brande

Role: backup

Marika Rasschaert, MD

Role: primary

038212441 ext. 32

Marika Rasschaert

Role: backup

Evelyn Van de Werf, MD

Role: primary

011337918 ext. 32

Evelyn Van de Werf

Role: backup

Katleen Verboven, MD

Role: primary

011337918 ext. 32

Katleen Verb

Role: backup

Isabelle Kindts, MD

Role: primary

056633943 ext. 32

Isabelle Kindts

Role: backup

Julie van der Veen, MD

Role: primary

015891664 ext. 32

Julie van der Veen

Role: backup

Erik Van de Kelft, MD

Role: primary

037607565 ext. 32

Erik Van de Kelft

Role: backup

Charlotte Billiet, MD

Role: primary

034433759 ext. 32

Charlotte Billiet

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTO21003GZA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Proton SBRT for Spinal Metastasis
NCT06895564 RECRUITING NA