The Clinical Efficacy of CT-Guided All-in-One Adaptive Emergency Radiotherapy for Spinal Cord Compression Caused by Spinal Metastases
NCT ID: NCT06608108
Last Updated: 2025-01-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-01
2026-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Emergency Radiotherapy in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression of Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02000518
Involved Versus Elective Target SSRS for Spinal Metastases
NCT04033536
A Single-center Observational Clinical Trial of Stereotactic Radiotherapy on Metastatic Spinal Tumors Using TomoTherapy
NCT05808998
Evaluation of a Novel CT-On-Rails or Trilogy Stereotactic Spine Radiotherapy System (SSRS)
NCT00508443
Delineation of Target Volume of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Spinal Tumors
NCT06587022
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Radiation therapy is one of the most commonly used and effective treatments for MSCC. Radiotherapy reduces tumor burden, alleviates localized bone pain, prevents pathological fractures and vertebral collapse, promotes the healing of pathological fractures, and relieves spinal cord compression, thereby improving mobility, function, and quality of life of patients. However, conventional radiotherapy workflows are complex and involve multiple steps. Patients typically need to visit different departments multiple times and may face days of waiting before receiving treatment, which is far from ideal in the emergency context of MSCC. The domestic innovative radiotherapy equipment, uRT-linac506C, was developed to address this need. It integrates diagnostic-grade spiral CT and linear accelerator technology into a single workflow, allowing for seamless, rapid transitions from simulation, CT scanning, intelligent contouring and modification of tumor targets and organs-at-risk, to treatment plan design, evaluation, verification, and implementation of the first radiation therapy. Without compromising standardized procedures, this significantly shortens waiting and treatment times, realizing All-in-One image-guided, diagnosis-treatment integration that seamlessly connects the various stages of radiotherapy. This approach reduces the time from patient positioning to treatment from several days with conventional radiotherapy to approximately 30 minutes, enabling rapid and precise radiation therapy to relieve spinal cord compression and improve patient outcomes. Investigators refer to this integrated approach as All-in-One emergency radiotherapy.
Although radiotherapy has become the primary treatment for spinal cord compression (especially when surgery is not feasible), emergency radiotherapy has significantly improved the timeliness and effectiveness of treatment, allowing patients to receive rapid relief and care in urgent situations and preventing severe consequences from delayed treatment. However, there is still debate about the specific implementation of radiation therapy for spinal metastases. Various fractionation regimens have been reported in the literature, ranging from single-fraction to multi-fraction radiation therapy. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment regimen for bone metastases in terms of treatment volume, total dose, or fractionation. For patients with a short expected survival, shorter courses of radiotherapy (1-5 fractions, with doses ranging from 8 to 20 Gy) are commonly used to reduce treatment time and minimize patient suffering. For patients with a longer expected survival (e.g., more than 6 months), the risk of disease progression or in-field recurrence must be considered, and longer courses of radiotherapy, such as the commonly used 10 × 3 Gy regimen, are more appropriate.
In previous large retrospective studies, patient survival was not considered, and many patients did not live long enough to experience local recurrence, which may have led to biased results in local control. Therefore, it is reasonable to investigate whether patients with a longer prognosis can benefit from increased radiation doses (beyond the traditional 10 × 3 Gy). For these longer-surviving patients, exploring more precise and individualized radiotherapy regimens is necessary. This may include higher radiation doses and longer treatment durations to achieve better disease control and prolong progression-free and overall survival.
With advances in imaging and radiotherapy technology, Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) has emerged as a radiotherapy technique that applies differential doses to high-risk and low-risk regions within the same radiation field, maximizing normal tissue protection while increasing the dose to the target area. Sequential Boost Radiotherapy involves delivering additional doses to tumors or high-risk areas after the standard radiotherapy course is completed, further increasing the cumulative radiation dose. Based on long-term experience, investigators have developed the ability to escalate the planned gross tumor volume (PGTV) from the traditional 3 Gy per fraction to 4 Gy per fraction while maintaining organ-at-risk dose limits within tolerance. Moreover, the number of sequential boost sessions has been increased from the traditional 10 to 12 sessions, with promising initial results.
Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Simultaneous Integrated and Sequential Boost Radiotherapy in patients with MSCC receiving All-in-One adaptive emergency radiotherapy guided by CT for spinal metastases. Investigators seek to validate its safety and efficacy while also recording and analyzing the overall treatment duration of All-in-One emergency radiotherapy. Ultimately, investigators hope to improve patient quality of life and extend survival, providing scientific evidence and guidance for clinical practice.
Supplement
Dear Professor,
Investigators sincerely appreciate the review of this clinical trial application by the professor. Further clarification regarding the study design and type is provided. Since 2018, the radiation oncology center has employed this dose-fractionation regimen to treat patients with malignant spinal cord compression. Recently, due to clinical demand, an advanced accelerator system integrated with diagnostic-grade CT has been introduced, which is now routinely applied in clinical practice. This study is conducted within this clinical context. All enrolled participants, regardless of their involvement in the study, will receive the same treatment methods and protocols, and the research itself will not influence the treatment. Therefore, this study qualifies as a prospective, non-interventional study.
Should the professor have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to reach out!
Best regards.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Non-interventional studies
Non-intervention
Non-intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-intervention
Non-intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
(2)Acute or subacute onset of MSCC. (3)Modified Tokuhashi score for spinal metastases ≥ 9, indicating an expected survival time \> 6 months.
(4)Spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) ≤ 7, indicating spinal stability. (5)General performance status (Karnofsky score) ≥ 60. (6)No prior radiotherapy or surgical treatment for the spinal metastases before enrollment.
(7)Patient refuses or is intolerant to surgery. (8)No other severe comorbidities, such as uncontrolled infections or serious cardiopulmonary diseases, that may affect radiotherapy outcomes or increase treatment risks.
(9)No other active malignancies (except for the primary tumor and spinal metastases) to ensure the study's focus.
(10)Age 18 years or older. (11)Informed consent obtained from the patient. (12) Accept CT guided spinal cord compression all in one adaptive emergency radiotherapy for spinal metastases.
Exclusion Criteria
(2)Intolerance to radiotherapy. (3)Severe psychiatric or neurological disorders. (4)Pregnant or breastfeeding women. (5)Clear indications that the affected spinal cord region requires decompression surgery first.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
551-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.