Physiotherapy in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

NCT ID: NCT03961906

Last Updated: 2019-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-01

Study Completion Date

2017-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Goal of this study is to develop and evaluate a physiotherapy concept that is focused on bilateral leg spasticity and aims to reduce spastic gait disturbance and to improve mobility in patients suffering from HSP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized single-center parallel study with a control group design. A blinded block randomization in groups of four was performed in equal parts toward the treatment (TPC) or the control (regular standard-of-care) group using randomization.com. Group assignment was kept in a closed envelope which was opened by the participant at the end of the baseline visit. Therefore both, the movement disorder specialist as well as the physiotherapist, were blinded to the randomization result for the baseline assessment up to the beginning of the first physiotherapy training session.

Therapeutic effects were evaluated at follow-up visits after 12 weeks (first visit, short-term effect) and after 26 weeks (second visit, long-term effect) comparing standard-of care with the TPC. Clinical evaluation is stated in detail below. Primary outcome assessment of this study was the change between baseline and follow-up assessment in treatment to control group in the spastic paraplegia rating scale (SPRS) score as a validated measure of disease severity (see Reference). Secondary outcome assessment was the change in walking distance in the Three-Minute-Walking test (3MW). Further exploratory outcome assessments were evaluated as effect sizes as specified below.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Masking only for baseline visit.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tübingen physiotherapy concept

Will receive our therapy concept and perform self-trainings on a regular basis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

physiotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Will receive two trainings. First training in week one after baseline assessment for three consecutive days 60 min twice daily by trained physiotherapists and in week three further two days with 60min once daily.

controls

Will receive standard-care which includes their regular physiotherapy as provided by the local therapist and can include self-trainings as well.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

physiotherapy

Will receive two trainings. First training in week one after baseline assessment for three consecutive days 60 min twice daily by trained physiotherapists and in week three further two days with 60min once daily.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinical diagnosis of hereditary spastic paraplegia
* manifest spastic gait disturbance
* remaining walking ability of at least 100m in three minutes,
* no botulinum toxin treatment during the entire study and three months prior to study inclusion
* no functional electronic stimulation during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria

* see above
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Tuebingen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Ludger Schöls

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Tübingen, Center for Neurology

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schule R, Holland-Letz T, Klimpe S, Kassubek J, Klopstock T, Mall V, Otto S, Winner B, Schols L. The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS): a reliable and valid measure of disease severity. Neurology. 2006 Aug 8;67(3):430-4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228242.53336.90.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16894103 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Physiotherapy in HSP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.