Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
53 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-01
2017-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of an Intensive Training Program for Patients with Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis SPG4/Spast
NCT06229626
Identification of Modifying Factors in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
NCT05373082
Evidence-based Physical Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02193386
Role of Dynamic Movement Intervention in Children with Spastic Diplegia
NCT06270550
Physical Therapy for Improving Functionality, Gait and Participation in Cerebral Palsy
NCT04778930
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therapeutic effects were evaluated at follow-up visits after 12 weeks (first visit, short-term effect) and after 26 weeks (second visit, long-term effect) comparing standard-of care with the TPC. Clinical evaluation is stated in detail below. Primary outcome assessment of this study was the change between baseline and follow-up assessment in treatment to control group in the spastic paraplegia rating scale (SPRS) score as a validated measure of disease severity (see Reference). Secondary outcome assessment was the change in walking distance in the Three-Minute-Walking test (3MW). Further exploratory outcome assessments were evaluated as effect sizes as specified below.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tübingen physiotherapy concept
Will receive our therapy concept and perform self-trainings on a regular basis.
physiotherapy
Will receive two trainings. First training in week one after baseline assessment for three consecutive days 60 min twice daily by trained physiotherapists and in week three further two days with 60min once daily.
controls
Will receive standard-care which includes their regular physiotherapy as provided by the local therapist and can include self-trainings as well.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
physiotherapy
Will receive two trainings. First training in week one after baseline assessment for three consecutive days 60 min twice daily by trained physiotherapists and in week three further two days with 60min once daily.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* manifest spastic gait disturbance
* remaining walking ability of at least 100m in three minutes,
* no botulinum toxin treatment during the entire study and three months prior to study inclusion
* no functional electronic stimulation during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Tuebingen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. Ludger Schöls
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Tübingen, Center for Neurology
Tübingen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schule R, Holland-Letz T, Klimpe S, Kassubek J, Klopstock T, Mall V, Otto S, Winner B, Schols L. The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS): a reliable and valid measure of disease severity. Neurology. 2006 Aug 8;67(3):430-4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228242.53336.90.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Physiotherapy in HSP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.