Effect of the Antihistamine Injection to Prevent Paradoxical Reaction During Sedative Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03940391

Last Updated: 2020-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-04-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This single-blind prospective study is aimed to investigate the effect of antihistamine as an adjunctive sedative for the patients with histories of severe paradoxical reaction to midazolam during sedative endoscopy. Participating patients are to receive antihistamine intravenously in addition to midazolam. The primary outcome is the reduction of paradoxical reaction in the antihistamine combination group. The secondary outcome is to compare sedation quality, performance quality, reduction of total midazolam dose will be analyzed between antihistamine combination and midazolam only group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present study will be conducted at Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam center between May 2019 and April 2020. Participants who have histories of paradoxical reaction to sedative endoscopy in medical record gave consent on the day of the endoscopy and were assigned to receive the combination of chlorpheniramine (4-6mg) with midazolam(1-10mg) Meanwhile, the patients do not want the use of chlorpheniramine and were assigned to midazolam alone as routine clinical practice. Research medication (chlorpheniramine) was administered 2 to 3 minutes before the administration of midazolam outside of endoscopy room. The blinded endoscopist and assistant nurse are going to perform induction for moderate sedation using incremental doses of the intravenous midazolam (1-2 mg) given every 2 minutes. The endoscopists and assistant nurses will assess the occurrence of severe paradoxical reaction (Grade 3) and other major quality outcomes (procedure/intubation time, sedation quality, completeness of procedure \[10 Key image documentation\], the satisfaction of procedure, side effects). The endoscopists and nurses will individually rate outcome measure using a 5-point Likert scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

antihistamine combination

Participants in this group will get combination chlorpheniramine and midazolam injection for sedative endoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorpheniramine and midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of chlorpheniramine injection as an adjunctive sedative during sedative endoscopy.

midazolam

Participants in this group will get only midazolam injection for sedative endoscopy

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of midazolam as a sedative during sedative endoscopy as routine clinical practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chlorpheniramine and midazolam

Administration of chlorpheniramine injection as an adjunctive sedative during sedative endoscopy.

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam

Administration of midazolam as a sedative during sedative endoscopy as routine clinical practice.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Previous histories of the paradoxical reaction during a sedative endoscopic examination

Exclusion Criteria

* inability to execute informed consent
* allergic to antihistamine agent
* pregnancy
* severe cardiopulmonary disease
* prior administration of antihistamine on the same day
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Su Jin Chung

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sachar H, Pichetshote N, Nandigam K, Vaidya K, Laine L. Continued midazolam versus diphenhydramine in difficult-to-sedate patients: a randomized double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1297-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28159539 (View on PubMed)

Nusrat S, Madhoun MF, Tierney WM. Use of diphenhydramine as an adjunctive sedative for colonoscopy in patients on chronic opioid therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2342. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29689257 (View on PubMed)

Tae CH, Kang KJ, Min BH, Ahn JH, Kim S, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ. Paradoxical reaction to midazolam in patients undergoing endoscopy under sedation: Incidence, risk factors and the effect of flumazenil. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Aug;46(8):710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24893689 (View on PubMed)

Tu RH, Grewall P, Leung JW, Suryaprasad AG, Sheykhzadeh PI, Doan C, Garcia JC, Zhang N, Prindiville T, Mann S, Trudeau W. Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.015.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16377322 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-1093-054-1017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IV Injection of Metoclopramide With or Without Dexamethasone
NCT07343817 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1