Sedation Of Adult Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Network Meta-analysis

NCT ID: NCT03632330

Last Updated: 2023-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

6963 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-05

Study Completion Date

2018-03-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in sedation during endoscopy by analyzing the most recently published interventional trials and observational studies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A variety of sedatives are available in procedural sedation and the efficacy \& safety have been compared in several trials for procedural sedation. However, none of clinical trial has enough number of patients to clarify the conclusive differences among sedatives. Thus, pooling all available studies together systematically by network meta-analysis for GI endoscopic procedure may provide a better understanding of efficacy and safety of sedatives. Therefore we would like to conduct a network meta-analysis to analyze the outcomes of GI endoscopy by using the most recently-published interventional trials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedation Dexmedetomidine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine group

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine group

Midazolam

Midazolam group

Midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam group

propofol

propofol group

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol group

Midazolam/Propofol

Midazolam and Propofol group

Midazolam/Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam/Propofol group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine group

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam

Midazolam group

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

Propofol group

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam/Propofol

Midazolam/Propofol group

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

The group includes patients treated with Dexmedetomidine The group includes patients treated with Midazolam The group includes patients treated with Propofol The group includes patients treated with Midazolam and propofol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inclusion criteria We will include studies if they (1) the setting was using any sedative for endoscopy for an procedural sedation (2) the study compared dexmedetomidine with other sedative for sedative therapy and (3) the outcomes included satisfaction score and adverse events.

Exclusion Criteria

* Exclusion criteria We excluded studies if they (1) the number of sedative was different in two arms (2) did not report the specific results comparing dexmedetomidine with other sedatives.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pfizer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pfizer Korea

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C0801043

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.