Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Grade III and IV Disease:Harmonic Scalpel Compared With Conventional Technique
NCT ID: NCT03938714
Last Updated: 2019-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-27
2016-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.
NCT03848468
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy in Second and Third Degree Piles
NCT05770141
Hemorrhoidectomy Only Versus Hemorrhoidectomy With Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy
NCT06588374
Comparison of Outcome of Injection Sclerotherapy Versus Rubber Band Ligation for Second Degree Hemorrhoids
NCT07199673
Hemorrhoidectomy With or Without Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Management of Patients With Hemorrhoids
NCT06884774
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ferguson closed hemorrhoidectomy is conventional procedure in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids but recent advances in harmonic scalpel have shown to produce favorable results. Comparison of these two is studied in terms of pain outcome as patient perceives, operative time and duration of hospital stay.
OBJECTIVES:
To compare the outcome of conventional hemorrhoidectomy versus harmonic scalpel in III and IV degree hemorrhoids.
STUDY DESIGN:
Randomized controlled trial
STUDY SETTING:
The study was conducted in surgical unit 1, Services hospital, Lahore.
DURATION OF STUDY:
Study was completed in six months after the approval of synopsis i.e. from 27th August 2015 to 26th February 2016.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
After approval from hospital ethical committee, 100 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria had been recruited from outdoor and emergency department. A detailed history had been taken including demographic data (age, address) and all patients had been clinically examined .Patients was divided in two groups randomly using random number tables. Group A: Conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Group B: harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Patients had been requested to sign an informed consent. They had been assured regarding confidentiality and expertise used for the procedure. All procedures had been performed by a single surgical operating team to control bias. Per operatively operative time was noted. Post operatively pain had been assessed in 24 hours , mean hospital stay was measured in days from postoperative day till day of discharge (as per operational definition). All data had been collected and recorded on the attached Performa.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CH( Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy)
Closed Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy
Hemorrhoidectomy
Excision of third and fourth degree hemorrhoids
HS( Harmonic Scalpel)
Harmonic Scalpel Hemorrhoidectomy
Hemorrhoidectomy
Excision of third and fourth degree hemorrhoids
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hemorrhoidectomy
Excision of third and fourth degree hemorrhoids
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Any other anorectal pathology such as anal fissure ,fistula or anal cancer on history and per rectal examination
* Previous anal surgery assessed by history and per rectal examination
* Inability to give informed consent
* ASA grade III/IV on detailed history, clinical examination and laboratory findings e.g. deranged hepatic(AST/ALT \>40IU/L) and renal profile ( creatinine \>1:2mg/dl)and evidence of ischemic heart disease(annexure attached).
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Services Hospital, Lahore
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Safia Zahir Ahmed
principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Safia Z Ahmed, FCPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Services Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
services Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB/503/SIMS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.