Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy

NCT ID: NCT01263431

Last Updated: 2015-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim of the study is to compare short term results of 2 surgical treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease, namely: pain and postoperative morbidity,complications and effectiveness within 30 days, re-starting daily and working activity, patients' satisfaction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is burdened by severe postoperative pain. For this reason less painful treatments have been developed, such as Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled anopexy. Both techniques seem to be safe, causing little postoperative pain. A combination of the two techniques could possibly treat both bleeding and prolapse with minimal discomfort

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Third Degree Hemorrhoids

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hemorrhoidectomy

Excision of hemorrhoid cushions

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hemorrhoidectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Each of the main haemorrhoid is dissected and the apex is ligated and then cut, near to the dentate line

Hemorrhoidal dearterialization

Ligation of therminbal branches oh hemorrhoid arteries

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hemorrhoidal dearterialization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A special instrument (THD, G.F., Medical Division, Correggio, Italy )with an incorporated Doppler probe is used to detected the six terminal branches of the superior rectal artery which are ligated above the dentate line, then a running suture is performed in order to obtain a mucopexy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hemorrhoidectomy

Each of the main haemorrhoid is dissected and the apex is ligated and then cut, near to the dentate line

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hemorrhoidal dearterialization

A special instrument (THD, G.F., Medical Division, Correggio, Italy )with an incorporated Doppler probe is used to detected the six terminal branches of the superior rectal artery which are ligated above the dentate line, then a running suture is performed in order to obtain a mucopexy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18-80, candidate to surgery for 3rd degree hemorrhoids

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous anal surgery or pelvic radiotherapy
* Fecal incontinence or obstructed defecation
* IBD, IBS
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Scientific Institute San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paola De Nardi

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paola De Nardi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):348-53. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000085.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24509458 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Emorroidi grado 3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.