Multicenter Prospective Trial on Hemorrhoids

NCT ID: NCT03245086

Last Updated: 2017-08-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

492 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-17

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of one-year recurrence in a large population (N=492). Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multicenter, parallel arm, non-randomized prospective data collection trial comparing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. All subjects will already be scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy, the surgery is NOT part of the research. Although a randomized study would control for variation among surgeons, this study design provides the best patient safety since the surgeons will perform the technique they do most frequently. Variability in the patient population will be managed with a conservative sample size, which allows for a multivariate analysis of the sample populations if any confounding variables are noted during initial data analyses. In addition, the variability will be minimized with stringent and detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria in terms of hemorrhoidal disease. Patients will be enrolled and followed for one year. Participating surgeons will be credentialed and each participating surgeon will enroll up to ten consecutive patients.

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemorrhoids

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization (THD)

Patients with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns undergoing transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization (THD).

Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization

Intervention Type DEVICE

The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion The proctoscope is fully introduced transanally to reach the lower rectum. Under Doppler guidance, six arterial signals are found circumferentially above the dentate line. The approach to make the 'dearterialization' involves the transfixation of the rectal mucosa and submucosa to entrap the artery using a suture. Mucopexy is performed after the artery ligation with the same suture used for the dearterialization. Finally, the suture is tied to fix the mucopexy.

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

Patients with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns undergoing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion. A Ferguson-Hill retractor is used to expose the hemorrhoids. Dissection with scissors is directed up to the dentate line where the fibers of the sphincter muscles are exposed and only a mucosal pedicle remains attached. A Buie-Smith crushing clamp is applied to this pedicle and the hemorrhoidal mass is excised at the superior level of the clamp. The pedicle is then ligated and the crushing clamp is removed. After dissection of the intermuscular septum is complete, the margins of the wound are drawn upward into the anal canal with stitches and are secured to the pedicle by the same suture. The remainder of the wound is closed with a stitch tied at the outer extremity of the wound using the same suture.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization

The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion The proctoscope is fully introduced transanally to reach the lower rectum. Under Doppler guidance, six arterial signals are found circumferentially above the dentate line. The approach to make the 'dearterialization' involves the transfixation of the rectal mucosa and submucosa to entrap the artery using a suture. Mucopexy is performed after the artery ligation with the same suture used for the dearterialization. Finally, the suture is tied to fix the mucopexy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy

The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion. A Ferguson-Hill retractor is used to expose the hemorrhoids. Dissection with scissors is directed up to the dentate line where the fibers of the sphincter muscles are exposed and only a mucosal pedicle remains attached. A Buie-Smith crushing clamp is applied to this pedicle and the hemorrhoidal mass is excised at the superior level of the clamp. The pedicle is then ligated and the crushing clamp is removed. After dissection of the intermuscular septum is complete, the margins of the wound are drawn upward into the anal canal with stitches and are secured to the pedicle by the same suture. The remainder of the wound is closed with a stitch tied at the outer extremity of the wound using the same suture.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

THD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patient must be:

* At least 18 years-old
* Able to sign informed consent
* Presenting with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns at physical examination and scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any prior anorectal surgery except for conventional office-based interventions (rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and infrared coagulation)
* Prior pelvic radiotherapy
* Inflammatory bowel diseases
* Pre-existing fecal incontinence (Wexner score5 ≥8)
* Pre-existing chronic anal diseases
* Grades III and IV gynecological and obstetrical trauma per medical history and/or physical examination
* Connective tissue disorders
* Subject is pregnant
* Subject is under incarceration
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

THD America

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stony Brook University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

George Angelos

George Angelos, MD, MS

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

George Angelos, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stony Brook University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stony Brook University

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Suresh Yelika, MD

Role: CONTACT

631-638-2215

Mahir Gachabayov, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Suresh Yelika, MD

Role: primary

631-638-2215

Mahir Gachabayov, MD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

FERGUSON JA, HEATON JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959 Mar-Apr;2(2):176-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02616713. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13652788 (View on PubMed)

Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D'Agostino E, Pagano C, Cavazzoni E, Brugnano L, Litta F. Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):O10-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12779.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25213152 (View on PubMed)

Gachabayov M, Angelos G, George G, Kajmolli A, McGuirk M, Bergamaschi R. A Multicenter Prospective Non-Randomized Study Comparing Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy and Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Prolapsed, Nonincarcerated, Reducible Hemorrhoids: A Study Protocol. Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov 28;37:109-112.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33238029 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

934287

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.