The Two Treatment Methods Compared the Sclerosing Agent Injection and the Rubber Wrapping

NCT ID: NCT05089500

Last Updated: 2021-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

984 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a prospective, multicentre, and randomized-controlled clinical study.The researchers wanted to explore the optimal treatment regimen for soft hemorrhoid within I-Ⅲ degrees by evaluating and comparing the effectiveness, safety and cost effect ratio of sclerosing injection and rubber lap ligation in patients with different internal hemorrhoid scores

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

From November 2021 to July 2022, patients with internal hemorrhoids seeking treatment were enrolled according to the following criteria:

1. Age 18 to 75, men and women;
2. Patients with clinical symptoms of degree I-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids confirmed after medical history collection, clinical examination or colonoscopy;
3. The patient was willing to receive minimally invasive treatment for internal hemorrhoids and sign informed consent by himself or his legal agent.

Exclusion criteria are as follows:

1. age \<18 or\> 75;
2. External hemorrhoids or mixed hemorrhoids;
3. Ⅳ degree of hemorrhoid
4. Unsymptomatic internal hemorrhoids;
5. Internal hemorrhoids were combined with complications such as chimerism, thrombosis, ulceration, or infection;
6. Poor basic conditions can not tolerate endoscopic treatment, such as serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, respiratory dysfunction, liver and kidney failure, mental disorders, etc.;
7. There are other serious diseases involving the rectum and anus, such as anal fistula, perianal infection, anal stenosis, inflammatory bowel disease activity period, colorectal tumors, etc.;
8. Patients with severe coagulation dysfunction or long-term oral anticoagulant drugs or antiplatelet aggregation drugs without withdrawal;
9. Women in pregnancy or puerperium;
10. Sclerotic with allergy patient , such as polycininol, etc;
11. Previous history of endoscopic treatment of hemorrhoid disease, surgical history or other low rectal and anal surgery history;
12. The patient was unwilling to receive endoscopic treatment for internal hemorrhoids, and himself or his legal agent refused to sign the informed consent form.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemorrhoid Hemorrhoids Hemorrhoids Internal Hemorrhoid Prolapse Hemorrhoid Bleeding Hemorrhoid Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients were randomized assigned to the EIS group, preparing disposable endoscopic injections and sclerosing which were routinely administered with 1% polycinol.The transparent cap was fixed at the front end of the endoscope in inverted or orthofield of view.The stiffening agent or foam stiffer added to Meilan was injected with a disposable injection needle at 4-6 points at the oral end near the dentate line. Each point contained 0.2-1ml, and stopped after the hemorrhoid nucleus changed color. If necessary, a transparent cap was pressed to stop the bleeding to distribute the stiffening agent evenly.

Endoscopic Band Ligation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic Band Ligation

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients were randomized assigned to the EBL group and were to be prepared before surgery.After the socket is mounted at the inner lens end, the socket is obviously tied at 1-2cm hemorrhoids at the mouth above the dentate line, usually 2-4 rings.With mucosal prolapse, pericyclic multiple dislocation ligation can be performed 2-3cm above the obvious prolapse.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy

Patients were randomized assigned to the EIS group, preparing disposable endoscopic injections and sclerosing which were routinely administered with 1% polycinol.The transparent cap was fixed at the front end of the endoscope in inverted or orthofield of view.The stiffening agent or foam stiffer added to Meilan was injected with a disposable injection needle at 4-6 points at the oral end near the dentate line. Each point contained 0.2-1ml, and stopped after the hemorrhoid nucleus changed color. If necessary, a transparent cap was pressed to stop the bleeding to distribute the stiffening agent evenly.

Intervention Type OTHER

Endoscopic Band Ligation

Patients were randomized assigned to the EBL group and were to be prepared before surgery.After the socket is mounted at the inner lens end, the socket is obviously tied at 1-2cm hemorrhoids at the mouth above the dentate line, usually 2-4 rings.With mucosal prolapse, pericyclic multiple dislocation ligation can be performed 2-3cm above the obvious prolapse.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EIS EBL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 to 75, men and women;
2. Patients with clinical symptoms of degree I-Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids confirmed after medical history collection, clinical examination or colonoscopy;
3. The patient was willing to receive minimally invasive treatment for internal hemorrhoids and sign informed consent by himself or his legal agent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \<18 or age\> 75;
2. External hemorrhoids or mixed hemorrhoids;
3. degree Ⅳ internal hemorrhoids
4. Unsymptomatic internal hemorrhoids
5. Internal hemorrhoids were combined with complications such as chimerism, thrombosis, ulceration, or infection;
6. Poor basic conditions can not tolerate endoscopic treatment, such as serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, respiratory dysfunction, liver and kidney failure, mental disorders, etc.;
7. There are other serious diseases involving the rectum and anus, such as anal fistula, perianal infection, anal stenosis, inflammatory bowel disease activity period, colorectal tumors, etc.;
8. Patients with severe coagulation dysfunction or long-term oral anticoagulant drugs or antiplatelet aggregation drugs without withdrawal;
9. Women in pregnancy or puerperium;
10. Hardening agent allergy patients, such as polycininol, etc;
11. Previous history of endoscopic treatment of hemorrhoid disease, surgical history or other low rectal and anal surgery history;
12. The patient was unwilling to receive endoscopic treatment for internal hemorrhoids, and himself or his legal agent refused to sign the informed consent form.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Army Military Medical University Southwestern Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanxi Provincial Coal Central Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hubei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wuhan Puren Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wuhan Tianyou Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hanyang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Enshi State Central Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yichang Central People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Central Hospital of Xiaogan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Xiaogan City First People's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fuyang City Second People's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chibi City People's Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ChenMingkai

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mingkai Chen, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mingkai Chen

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mingkai Chen, M.D

Role: CONTACT

0086-13720330580

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mingkai Chen, doctor

Role: primary

13720330580

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elbetti C, Giani I, Novelli E, Fucini C, Martellucci J. The single pile classification: a new tool for the classification of haemorrhoidal disease and the comparison of treatment results. Updates Surg. 2015 Dec;67(4):421-6. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0333-0. Epub 2015 Nov 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26547759 (View on PubMed)

Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, Dellon ES, Eluri S, Gangarosa LM, Jensen ET, Lund JL, Pasricha S, Runge T, Schmidt M, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1731-1741.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26327134 (View on PubMed)

Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):380-6. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90828-o.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 2295392 (View on PubMed)

Cosman BC. Piles of Money: "Hemorrhoids" Are a Billion-Dollar Industry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;114(5):716-717. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000234.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30998519 (View on PubMed)

van Tol RR, Kleijnen J, Watson AJM, Jongen J, Altomare DF, Qvist N, Higuero T, Muris JWM, Breukink SO. European Society of ColoProctology: guideline for haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;22(6):650-662. doi: 10.1111/codi.14975. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32067353 (View on PubMed)

Higuero T, Abramowitz L, Castinel A, Fathallah N, Hemery P, Laclotte Duhoux C, Pigot F, Pillant-Le Moult H, Senejoux A, Siproudhis L, Staumont G, Suduca JM, Vinson-Bonnet B. Guidelines for the treatment of hemorrhoids (short report). J Visc Surg. 2016 Jun;153(3):213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 May 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27209079 (View on PubMed)

Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Mar;61(3):284-292. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001030. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29420423 (View on PubMed)

Awad AE, Soliman HH, Saif SA, Darwish AM, Mosaad S, Elfert AA. A prospective randomised comparative study of endoscopic band ligation versus injection sclerotherapy of bleeding internal haemorrhoids in patients with liver cirrhosis. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;13(2):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22980596 (View on PubMed)

Rubbini M, Ascanelli S. Classification and guidelines of hemorrhoidal disease: Present and future. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar 27;11(3):117-121. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i3.117.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31057696 (View on PubMed)

Rorvik HD, Styr K, Ilum L, McKinstry GL, Dragesund T, Campos AH, Brandstrup B, Olaison G. Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health ScaleHD: New Tools to Evaluate Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life in Hemorrhoidal Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Mar;62(3):333-342. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001234.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30451751 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WDRY2021-K131

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id