Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection Ultrasound Guided in LDP
NCT ID: NCT03933150
Last Updated: 2020-03-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-01
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
All the injection procedures were performed in a specialized room with a FL device in the radiology department. We used a FL device GS 1004 with ALLURA XPER FD 20 system (Philips, Holland) with X-ray tube housing assembly, X-ray tube, beam limiting device and image receptor
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-guided Caudal or Interlaminar Corticosteroid Epidural Injection for Sciatica
NCT02897336
Fluoroscopy Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injection Versus Ultrasound Guided Injection in Patients With Low Back Pain Due to Facet Syndrome
NCT03770585
The Aim of Study is to Identify the Predictive Factors for the Success of Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Treatment of Patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT06795542
Caudal Corticosteroid vs. Dextrose Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain.
NCT02116075
Relief of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Symptoms
NCT06393959
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Those who met the inclusion criteria wereselected. Conversely, those who did not meet inclusion criteria or met the exclusion criteria were excluded.Accordingly, 136 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups:
* Group 1: included 68 patients who received US-guided CESI. They were 39 females and 29 males. Their age ranged from 23 to 65.
* Group 2: included 68 patients who received FL-guided CESI. They were 38 females and 30 males. Their age ranged from 22 to 62.
A written consent was obtained from each participant sharing in this study. The institutional research board of faculty of medicine, Mansoura University, approved this study, code: MS/16.06.46.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with LDP with unilateral radiculopathy diagnosed by routine clinical examination and MRI, in whom conservative treatment (medical treatment and physiotherapy) failed for more than 6 weeks and refuse surgery or were unfit for surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
Vertebral fractures, direct trauma, spinal inflammatory disease, spinal infection, bleeding tendency, LBP with tumors, bilateral radiculopathy, cauda equina syndrome, spinal canal stenosis, post-laminectomy surgery, diabetic and hypertensive patients.
Study design:
Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Type of randomization:
Patients were randomly divided into 2 treatment groups. For allotting, bunches bits of paper were set up in a similar number of patients. The name of treatment strategies was composed on the bits of paper. At that point, patients were made a request to take one paper and this is the treatment sort for every individual was determined.
I. Clinical Evaluation:
1\. History Taking:including
1. Personal history
o Name, age, sex, occupation, marital status, offspring and smoking.
2. Present History
* Pain: onset, course, duration, site, nature, radiation and modifying factors.
* Associated symptoms: fever, unexplained weight loss, night pain, chronic cough, stiffness, pain in other joints, skin lesions, diarrhea, urogenital diseases, eye lesions, anxiety, depression, fatigue or sleep disturbance.
* Neurological symptoms: numbness, paresthesia, muscle weakness, claudication, or sphincteric disturbance.
* Articular symptoms : of other joints including cervical, hips and knees
* Symptoms related to other systems: respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, urinary, and gynecological systems.
* Work related conditions
3. Past History III. Assessment of pain Patients were assessed before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after the injection using VAS.
IV. Assessment of pain and function Patients were assessed before treatment, 1 month and 3 months after the injection procedure by the ODI.
All the eligible patients were treated with either US-guided or FL-guided CESI, were administered a mixture of 20 cc (0.5% lidocaine 18.0 mL \&2ml of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/1ml) (Bicket, et al., 2015; Manchikanti, et al., 2015b).
A. Ultrasound-Guided CESI (Group 1) All the injection procedures were performed as an outpatient clinic setting. We used Acuson P300 (Siemens, Italy) with a linear transducer at 6 to 12 MHz as the US instrument, another curved transducer at 2-5 MHz was available for obese patients.
B. Fluoroscopy-Guided CESI (Group 2) All the injection procedures were performed in a specialized room with a FL device in the radiology department. We used a FL device GS 1004 with ALLURA XPER FD 20 system (Philips, Holland) with X-ray tube housing assembly, X-ray tube, beam limiting device and image receptor
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
Patients were randomly divided into 2 treatment groups. For allotting, bunches bits of paper were set up in a similar number of patients. The name of treatment strategies was composed on the bits of paper. At that point, patients were made a request to take one paper and this is the treatment sort for every individual was determined.
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ultrasoun guided caudal epidural injection
A. Ultrasound-Guided CESI (Group 1) All the injection procedures were performed as an outpatient clinic setting. We used Acuson P300 (Siemens, Italy) with a linear transducer at 6 to 12 MHz as the US instrument, another curved transducer at 2-5 MHz was available for obese patients.
ultrasound guided caudal epidural injection
A. Ultrasound-Guided CESI (Group 1) All the injection procedures were performed as an outpatient clinic setting. We used Acuson P300 (Siemens, Italy) with a linear transducer at 6 to 12 MHz as the US instrument, another curved transducer at 2-5 MHz was available for obese patients.
B. Fluoroscopy-Guided CESI (Group 2) All the injection procedures were performed in a specialized room with a FL device in the radiology department. We used a FL device GS 1004 with ALLURA XPER FD 20 system (Philips, Holland) with X-ray tube housing assembly, X-ray tube, beam limiting device and image receptor
fluoroscopy guided caudal epidural injection
B. Fluoroscopy-Guided CESI (Group 2) All the injection procedures were performed in a specialized room with a FL device in the radiology department. We used a FL device GS 1004 with ALLURA XPER FD 20 system (Philips, Holland) with X-ray tube housing assembly, X-ray tube, beam limiting device and image receptor
ultrasound guided caudal epidural injection
A. Ultrasound-Guided CESI (Group 1) All the injection procedures were performed as an outpatient clinic setting. We used Acuson P300 (Siemens, Italy) with a linear transducer at 6 to 12 MHz as the US instrument, another curved transducer at 2-5 MHz was available for obese patients.
B. Fluoroscopy-Guided CESI (Group 2) All the injection procedures were performed in a specialized room with a FL device in the radiology department. We used a FL device GS 1004 with ALLURA XPER FD 20 system (Philips, Holland) with X-ray tube housing assembly, X-ray tube, beam limiting device and image receptor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ultrasound guided caudal epidural injection
A. Ultrasound-Guided CESI (Group 1) All the injection procedures were performed as an outpatient clinic setting. We used Acuson P300 (Siemens, Italy) with a linear transducer at 6 to 12 MHz as the US instrument, another curved transducer at 2-5 MHz was available for obese patients.
B. Fluoroscopy-Guided CESI (Group 2) All the injection procedures were performed in a specialized room with a FL device in the radiology department. We used a FL device GS 1004 with ALLURA XPER FD 20 system (Philips, Holland) with X-ray tube housing assembly, X-ray tube, beam limiting device and image receptor
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
22 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of medicine Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Provence, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
code: MS/16.06.46.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.