Proactive Outreach and Shared Decision Making in Improving Lung Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care Patients
NCT ID: NCT03929926
Last Updated: 2025-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2355 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-19
2024-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening in Underserved PA Populations
NCT04806399
Enhancing Lung Cancer Screening Through Human-Centered Intervention
NCT06351085
Support and Outreach to Increase Screening for Lung Cancer in Patients With a History of Smoking
NCT05679349
Using Connected Health to Increase Lung Cancer Screening
NCT04612946
Project PLUS Lung Cancer Screening Promotion
NCT05937399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To compare the combined intervention group (Outreach Contact Group \[OC\]/Outreach Contact and Decision Counseling Group \[OC-DCP\]) versus the control usual care group (UC) with respect to time to screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the combined intervention (OC/OC-DCP) and usual care (UC) groups with respect to the fraction of patients who are referred/scheduled for screening.
II. To compare the combined intervention (OC/OC-DCP) and usual care (UC) groups with respect to the proportion of the referred/scheduled patients who actually keep their screening appointment.
III. To determine cost of implementing the OC and OC-DCP interventions.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the two intervention groups (OC-DCP versus \[vs.\] OC) on the primary and secondary study endpoints (time to LDCT screening, proportion of patients referred/scheduled for screening, proportion of patients keeping their screening appointments, and cost).
II. To assess the feasibility of patient eligibility review by providers in the OC and OC-DCP arms.
III. To assess the difference in success in identifying eligible patients between arms.
IV. To assess the difference in reaching referred patients between arms.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 groups.
GROUP I (USUAL CARE): Patients receive usual care.
GROUP II (OUTREACH CONTACT): Patients receive educational materials in the mail about lung cancer screening with a cover letter from their physician. A week later, they receive a phone call from the study staff to assess their eligibility. Eligible and interested patients receive an office visit at the Jefferson Lung Cancer Screening Program (JLCSP) for shared decision-making and possible lung cancer screening.
GROUP III (OUTREACH + DECISION COUNSELING PROGRAM): Patients receive educational materials in the mail about lung cancer screening with a cover letter from their physician. A week later, they receive a phone call from the study staff to assess their eligibility. Patients then undergo a decision counseling session through a semi-structured Decision Counseling Program that includes a review of the mailed educational materials and completion of an interactive exercise intended to clarify personal preference related to screening options (to have LDCT or not to have LDCT). Patients interested in screening schedule an office visit at JLCSP for possible screening or are referred to their primary care physician for consultation.
After completion of study, patients are followed up for 90 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (usual care)
receive usual care
Best Practice
receive usual care
Group II (outreach contact)
Patients receive educational materials in the mail about lung cancer screening with a cover letter from their physician. A week later, they receive a phone call from the study staff to assess their eligibility. Eligible and interested patients receive an office visit at the JLCSP for shared decision-making and possible lung cancer screening.
Cancer Educational Materials
Receive educational materials via mail
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention
Receive shared decision making and lung cancer screening information
Group III (outreach + Decision Counseling Program)
Patients receive educational materials in the mail about lung cancer screening with a cover letter from their physician. A week later, they receive a phone call from the study staff to assess their eligibility. Patients then undergo a decision counseling session through a semi-structured Decision Counseling Program that includes a review of the mailed educational materials and completion of an interactive exercise intended to clarify personal preference related to screening options (to have LDCT or not to have LDCT). Patients interested in screening schedule an office visit at JLCSP for possible screening or are referred to their primary care physician for consultation.
Cancer Educational Materials
Receive educational materials via mail
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention
Receive shared decision making and lung cancer screening information
Counseling
Undergo decision counseling session
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Best Practice
receive usual care
Cancer Educational Materials
Receive educational materials via mail
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention
Receive shared decision making and lung cancer screening information
Counseling
Undergo decision counseling session
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* History of smoking (current or former) in the electronic health record (EHR).
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of lung cancer indicated in problem list in the EHR.
55 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ronald Myers
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JT 13384
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
18G.752
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.