Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-01
2020-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhancing Lung Cancer Screening Through Human-Centered Intervention
NCT06351085
Centralized Lung Cancer Screening Engagement in At-Risk Populations
NCT07216144
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Assessment
NCT06133816
Support and Outreach to Increase Screening for Lung Cancer in Patients With a History of Smoking
NCT05679349
Precision Prevention Strategy to Increase Uptake and Engagement in Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation Treatment
NCT05627674
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LungCARE Group
The intervention group will receive the LungCARE intervention
LungCARE
The LungCARE intervention involves patient and PCP components. The patient component consists of watching a short, educational video, answering questions about lung cancer screening preferences, and receiving a patient report and handout.
The PCP component consists of receiving a similar report (physician report) prior to the patient visit. This report is based on the patient's risk factors and lung cancer screening preferences. It contains additional information about documenting discussions related to risk, screening, and referrals in the electronic medical record system.
Comparison Group
The comparison group will receive usual care.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LungCARE
The LungCARE intervention involves patient and PCP components. The patient component consists of watching a short, educational video, answering questions about lung cancer screening preferences, and receiving a patient report and handout.
The PCP component consists of receiving a similar report (physician report) prior to the patient visit. This report is based on the patient's risk factors and lung cancer screening preferences. It contains additional information about documenting discussions related to risk, screening, and referrals in the electronic medical record system.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* smoked at least 30 pack-years in lifetime
* if former smoker, quit smoking within the last 15 years
* English speaker
* no prior history of lung cancer
* did not have a lung cancer screening test within the last year
* PCP does not object to patient's participation
* have a scheduled visit at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) internal medicine clinics.
Exclusion Criteria
* has a history of lung cancer
* had a lung cancer screening test within the last year
* PCP objects to patient's participation.
55 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tobacco Related Disease Research Program
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Celia Kaplan, DrPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3.
Henderson S, DeGroff A, Richards TB, Kish-Doto J, Soloe C, Heminger C, Rohan E. A qualitative analysis of lung cancer screening practices by primary care physicians. J Community Health. 2011 Dec;36(6):949-56. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9394-2.
McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):156-70. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156.
Poghosyan H, Kennedy Sheldon L, Cooley ME. The impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on smoking behaviors: a teachable moment? Cancer Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):446-75. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182406297.
Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, Byers T, Colditz GA, Gould MK, Jett JR, Sabichi AL, Smith-Bindman R, Wood DE, Qaseem A, Detterbeck FC. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2418-29. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5521.
Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
Walsh JME, Karliner L, Smith A, Leykin Y, Gregorich SE, Livaudais-Toman J, Velazquez AI, Lowenstein M, Kaplan CP. LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening-a Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(14):3115-3122. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. USPTF Bulletin: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Issues Draft Recommendation Statement on Screening for Lung Cancer. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2013.
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT).
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-22564
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.