DECIDE: Developing Tools for Lung Cancer Screening Discussion Improvement
NCT ID: NCT03891602
Last Updated: 2024-08-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
654 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-22
2023-01-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Proactive Outreach and Shared Decision Making in Improving Lung Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care Patients
NCT03929926
Decision Aid for the Improvement of Decision-Making in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT04946279
Improving Decision-Making Encounters in Lung Cancer Using a Low-Literacy Conversation Tool
NCT05407168
Assessing Social Determinants of Health to Increase Cancer Screening
NCT06052449
PCORI-CER-1306-03385 Informed Decisions About Lung Cancer Screening
NCT02286713
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clinicians
Primary care clinicians (general internists, family physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) who treat lung cancer screening eligible patients
Primary Care Clinicians' Lung Cancer Screening Survey
Includes items to assess attitudes, barriers, and knowledge of lung cancer screening guidelines.
Smokers/Former Smokers
Current smoker or former smoker who has quit within the past 15 years
Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (Smoking-Related Subscale)
Perceived Smoking-Related Stigma will be measured using the 5-item Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (Smoking-Related Subscale). The response scale is 1 = strongly disagree, to 4 = strongly agree, and scores range from 5 to 25 (high stigma). Cronbach's alphas were 0.75 to 0.89 in prior studies.
Patient Trust in the Medical
Medical Mistrust will be measured using the 5-item Patient Trust in the Medical Profession Scale.80 The five-point Likert responses measure the extent to which patients perceive their clinician to be honest, caring more about convenience, thorough and careful, and trusted. The range of scores is 5 to 25 (higher mistrust). Reliability and validity have been well established with a Cronbach"s alpha of 0.84.
Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) - Lung Cancer Screening
The DCS is a 16-item Likert-response item scale that has been modified for the lung cancer screening and smoking cessation contexts. The DCS was developed by O"Connor,74-75 and validated in many health decisions including breast cancer screening with Cronbach"s alphas ranging from 0.78 to 0.81. 74-75 Despite its name, the DCS measures more than decision conflict to encompass personal perceptions of perceived decision-making quality such as feeling the choice is informed, values based, and likely to be implemented as well as expressing satisfaction with the decision. 74-75 The DCS is comprised of items with response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The items are summed to total scale score with lower scores reflective of higher decision conflict and higher scores reflective of lower decision conflict.
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q)- Patient
Shared Decision Making Process will be measured from the patient perspective using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9),77 which has been validated with a Cronbach"s alpha of 0.94.
Stage of Readiness for Smoking Cessation - Contemplation Ladder
Among current smokers
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (Smoking-Related Subscale)
Perceived Smoking-Related Stigma will be measured using the 5-item Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (Smoking-Related Subscale). The response scale is 1 = strongly disagree, to 4 = strongly agree, and scores range from 5 to 25 (high stigma). Cronbach's alphas were 0.75 to 0.89 in prior studies.
Patient Trust in the Medical
Medical Mistrust will be measured using the 5-item Patient Trust in the Medical Profession Scale.80 The five-point Likert responses measure the extent to which patients perceive their clinician to be honest, caring more about convenience, thorough and careful, and trusted. The range of scores is 5 to 25 (higher mistrust). Reliability and validity have been well established with a Cronbach"s alpha of 0.84.
Decision Conflict Scale (DCS) - Lung Cancer Screening
The DCS is a 16-item Likert-response item scale that has been modified for the lung cancer screening and smoking cessation contexts. The DCS was developed by O"Connor,74-75 and validated in many health decisions including breast cancer screening with Cronbach"s alphas ranging from 0.78 to 0.81. 74-75 Despite its name, the DCS measures more than decision conflict to encompass personal perceptions of perceived decision-making quality such as feeling the choice is informed, values based, and likely to be implemented as well as expressing satisfaction with the decision. 74-75 The DCS is comprised of items with response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The items are summed to total scale score with lower scores reflective of higher decision conflict and higher scores reflective of lower decision conflict.
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q)- Patient
Shared Decision Making Process will be measured from the patient perspective using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9),77 which has been validated with a Cronbach"s alpha of 0.94.
Stage of Readiness for Smoking Cessation - Contemplation Ladder
Among current smokers
Primary Care Clinicians' Lung Cancer Screening Survey
Includes items to assess attitudes, barriers, and knowledge of lung cancer screening guidelines.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinician (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant)
* Practicing in a KPWA primary care clinic
* Having a patient panel with \>/= 10 lung cancer screening eligible patients
PATIENTS (Quantitative Phase):
* Age 55-80 years
* \>/= 30 pack-year tobacco smoking history
* Current smoker or former smoker who has quit within the past 15 years
* Documented SDM lung cancer screening discussion during a recent clinic visit
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index \>/=3)
* Lung cancer diagnosis
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Indiana University
OTHER
University of North Carolina
OTHER
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
OTHER
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
Hackensack Meridian Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lisa Carter-Bawa, PhD
Director | Cancer Prevention Precision Control Institute
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jamie Ostroff, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lisa Carter-Bawa, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hackensack Meridian Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro2022-0776
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
19-007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.