Trial Outcomes & Findings for DECIDE: Developing Tools for Lung Cancer Screening Discussion Improvement (NCT NCT03891602)
NCT ID: NCT03891602
Last Updated: 2024-08-23
Results Overview
Decisional Quality was measured using the multidimensional Decisional Conflict Scale, a 16-item Likert-response scale that was modified by the investigators for the lung cancer screening context. The total score ranging from 0 to 64. This total score is commonly transformed into a standardized score that falls within a 0 to 100 range. Decisional quality measured on this numeric scale from which lower scores represent lower decisional conflict and, therefore, higher decisional quality. Scores below 25 have been associated with low decisional conflict.
COMPLETED
654 participants
at baseline (study enrollment)
2024-08-23
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Clinicians
Primary care clinicians (general internists, family physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) who treat lung cancer screening eligible patients
Primary Care Clinicians' Lung Cancer Screening Survey: Includes items to assess attitudes, barriers, and knowledge of lung cancer screening guidelines.
|
Smokers/Former Smokers
Current smoker or former smoker who has quit within the past 15 years
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
125
|
529
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
125
|
529
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinicians who participated in the study were only asked for their age as a categorical variable as a result we cannot provide mean and standard deviation.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Clinicians
n=125 Participants
Primary care clinicians (general internists, family physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) who treat lung cancer screening eligible patients
|
Smokers/Former Smokers
n=529 Participants
Current smoker or former smoker who has quit within the past 15 years
|
Total
n=654 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
—
|
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=529 Participants • Clinicians who participated in the study were only asked for their age as a categorical variable as a result we cannot provide mean and standard deviation.
|
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=529 Participants • Clinicians who participated in the study were only asked for their age as a categorical variable as a result we cannot provide mean and standard deviation.
|
|
Age, Customized
<18 years
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years
|
80 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
> 50 years
|
45 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
529 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
574 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
81 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
235 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
316 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
43 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
294 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
337 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Prefer not to say
|
1 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
120 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
517 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
637 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
3 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
21 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
79 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
463 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
542 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
7 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
13 Participants
n=125 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=529 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=654 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
125 participants
n=125 Participants
|
529 participants
n=529 Participants
|
654 participants
n=654 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at baseline (study enrollment)Decisional Quality was measured using the multidimensional Decisional Conflict Scale, a 16-item Likert-response scale that was modified by the investigators for the lung cancer screening context. The total score ranging from 0 to 64. This total score is commonly transformed into a standardized score that falls within a 0 to 100 range. Decisional quality measured on this numeric scale from which lower scores represent lower decisional conflict and, therefore, higher decisional quality. Scores below 25 have been associated with low decisional conflict.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Smokers/Former Smokers
n=529 Participants
Current smoker or former smoker who has quit within the past 15 years
|
|---|---|
|
Key Components of Shared Decision Making Process That Predict Patient-perceived Lung Cancer Screening Decision Quality
|
21.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
Adverse Events
Clinicians
Smokers/Former Smokers
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Lisa Carter-Bawa, PhD, MPH, APRN, ANP-C, FAAN
Hackensack Meridian Health
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place