Routine Cardiac Screening in Sarcoidosis Patients

NCT ID: NCT03902223

Last Updated: 2025-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-05

Study Completion Date

2024-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This protocol is an unblended randomized screening trial will have consecutive patients with no suggestion of cardiac sarcoidosis according to usual screening enroll in an enhanced screening protocol. The routine clinical care is to gather patient's history of symptoms and under go an ECG. If a patient has an abnormal results in standard screening, they typically have further evaluations as part of their routine medical care. These tests might include an echocardiogram, ambulatory ECG, and advanced cardiac imaging (MRI, PET scan as per local practice). A patient that has normal results on standard screening will be randomly assigned to enhanced screening at each center. Half the patients will be randomized to usual follow-up (annual symptom assessment and ECG) and the other half will be assigned to the enhanced screening (echocardiogram and ambulatory ECG at enrollment and at 24 months).

The investigators hypothesize that screening using conventional history, physical and ECG in the general sarcoidosis population, followed by appropriate advanced imaging testing, will result in the identification of a higher percentage of ascertained cardiac sarcoidosis than has been reported historically (2-5%). The investigators hypothesize that routine use of echocardiogram with strain and ambulatory ECG will identify additional patients who will have advanced imaging abnormalities or who meet criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis. The investigators further hypothesize that re-screening patients after 24 months with repeat echocardiogram and ambulatory ECG will identify additional patients with suspicion for cardiac sarcoidosis who had no abnormalities on the standard screening tests.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac involvement is among the most feared complications of sarcoidosis, and it is the second leading cause of death from sarcoidosis. Autopsy studies and serial imaging studies in patients without cardiac symptoms suggest that approximately 25% of U.S. sarcoidosis patients have evidence of cardiac involvement. 3 Major manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis include conduction delays, dysrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy. Given the increased recognition of cardiac involvement, prompt screening and diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis has been emphasized as a key priority for sarcoidosis research. Screening for cardiac sarcoidosis conventionally has relied on symptoms and electrocardiogram. However, there are no validated screening instruments for symptom assessment, and the usefulness of individual components of the medical history (e.g. palpitations, chest pain, presyncope) has not been assessed. In one study, symptom assessment was found to be less than 50% sensitive for identification of individuals with abnormal cardiac imaging studies. ECG performed poorly, with less than 10% sensitivity. Holter monitoring and echocardiogram were more sensitive than ECG in that study, identifying 50% and 25%, respectively, of those with imaging findings suggesting cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). The intensity of screening for CS in unselected sarcoidosis patients is controversial. The Heart Rhythm Society working group could not agree that echocardiogram or ambulatory ECG added significantly to conventional testing of eliciting cardiac symptoms and ECG; therefore, the working group was unable to recommend adding these procedures as a routine for all sarcoidosis patients. In a large series of Greek non-cardiac sarcoidosis patients, echocardiogram and ambulatory ECG added little prognostic information to usual care. On the other hand, more sophisticated echocardiographic techniques such as speckle tracking seem to provide independent prognostic information. In a second study, Holter monitoring and echocardiography abnormalities were both more common in those with MRI findings consistent with CS, although the usefulness of the tests disappeared in multivariable analysis. While history and ECG are considered the standard of care at present, there is a continuing need to identify markers of poor outcomes. Cardiac MRI and/or cardiac FDG-PET scan can identify large proportions of individuals with asymptomatic imaging abnormalities, but these scans are expensive, require specialized expertise to interpret, require radiation (PET scan) and are likely impractical for widespread use in all sarcoidosis patients. A second unresolved issue concerning screening for cardiac sarcoidosis is the frequency of re-screening sarcoidosis patients who demonstrate no evidence for cardiac sarcoidosis on an initial screen. The investigators hypothesize that screening using conventional history, physical and ECG in the general sarcoidosis population, followed by appropriate advanced imaging testing, will result in the identification of a higher percentage of ascertained cardiac sarcoidosis than has been reported historically (2-5%). The investigators hypothesize that routine use of echocardiogram with strain and ambulatory ECG will identify additional patients who will have advanced imaging abnormalities or who meet criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis. The investigators further hypothesize that re-screening patients after 24 months with repeat echocardiogram and ambulatory ECG will identify additional patients with suspicion for cardiac sarcoidosis who had no abnormalities on the initial screening tests.

Aims

1. To evaluate the rate of diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis during standard of care clinical practice that relies on patient symptoms and ECG.
2. To evaluate whether second-tier screening tests (echocardiogram and ambulatory ECG) improve the rate of diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis beyond conventional screening methods.
3. To evaluate the rate of diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis in sarcoidosis patients who had initial negative conventional and second-tier screening tests after undergoing these screening tests again at two years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sarcoidosis Cardiac Sarcoidosis Boeck's Disease Besnier-Boeck Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Enhanced Screening Protocol For Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Arm will be randomly assigned to undergo enhanced screening methods (ambulatory ECG and echocardiogram) at month 0 and month 24, as well as a phone call/chart review at month 12.

Enhanced Screening Protocol for Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To utilize enhanced screening tests for cardiac sarcoidosis in an undiagnosed and potentially under-diagnosed patient population to determine the rate of missed cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis. Following testing by the standard screening tests, this intervention includes a subsequent echocardiogram and a wearable ECG, also known as a Holter Monitor or ambulatory ECG.

Routine Screening for Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Arm will be randomly assigned for the routine standard of care/no intervention with enhanced screening methods. They will be offered the EKG and symptom check at months 0 and 24, as well as a phone call/chart review at month 12.

Routine Screening for Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To utilize standard of care screening tests for cardiac sarcoidosis. This includes symptom check and a standard ECG.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enhanced Screening Protocol for Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

To utilize enhanced screening tests for cardiac sarcoidosis in an undiagnosed and potentially under-diagnosed patient population to determine the rate of missed cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis. Following testing by the standard screening tests, this intervention includes a subsequent echocardiogram and a wearable ECG, also known as a Holter Monitor or ambulatory ECG.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Routine Screening for Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis

To utilize standard of care screening tests for cardiac sarcoidosis. This includes symptom check and a standard ECG.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Echocardiogram and ambulatory ECG Symptom check and standard ECG.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis as per The American Thoracic Society guidelines
2. First visit to the enrolling center
3. Intent to continue care at the enrolling center at least annually

Exclusion Criteria

1. Referred to the enrolling center to evaluate for suspected cardiac sarcoidosis.
2. Pre-existing high suspicion for cardiac sarcoidosis, defined as having had cardiac MRI or cardiac PET scan, even if it was ordered by other institutions.
3. Severe sarcoidosis or other disease conferring a high likelihood of death or transplant within the next year
4. Unwilling or unable to undergo echocardiography and ambulatory ECG
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dan Culver, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Muhunthan Thillai, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Papworth Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Jewish Health

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois Medical Center At Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospital

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Penn Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

St. Antonius

Amsterdam, Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Site Status

Royal Papworth Hospital

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Netherlands United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSN504-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy Bern Registry
NCT04774549 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sahlgrenska Cardiomyopathy Project
NCT03527342 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION