Comparison of Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance and Pulse Contour Analysis in Renal Transplantation Patients
NCT ID: NCT03893513
Last Updated: 2019-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-12
2019-05-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hemodynamic Measurements During Liver Transplantation
NCT00682110
Cardiac Strain Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
NCT04316468
Strain Analysis for Assessment of Myocardic Dysfunction During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
NCT05037838
Impact of Simulator-based Training in Transoesophageal Echocardiography
NCT02537639
Validation of Cardiometry in Resuscitation of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation
NCT03228329
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transthoracic Electrical Bioimpedance
Non-invasive hemodynamic monitor
Pulse Contour Analysis
Invasive hemodynamic monitor
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Morbid obesity
* Bradycardia (\< 50 bpm)
* Tachycardia (\> 110 bpm)
* refuse to participate
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dita Aditianingsih
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dita Aditianingsih
MD, PhD, Anesthesiologist Consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, Payen D, Perel A, Hoeft A, Romagnoli S, Ranieri VM, Ichai C, Forget P, Della Rocca G, Rhodes A. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015 May 8;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0932-7.
Joosten A, Huynh T, Suehiro K, Canales C, Cannesson M, Rinehart J. Goal-Directed fluid therapy with closed-loop assistance during moderate risk surgery using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring: A pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;114(6):886-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev002. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K; OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305.
Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1392-402. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):909-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.909.
Edison E, Pearse R. Goal directed therapy in the perioperative setting: What is the evidence? In: Paradise Lost and the Cosmological Revolution. 2014.
Aya HD, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. Perioperative Haemodynamic Optimisation. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Apr;42(2):56-65. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.2220141. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
Saugel B, Cecconi M, Wagner JY, Reuter DA. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):562-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu447. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
Alhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Hofer CK. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):214. doi: 10.1186/cc9996. Epub 2011 Mar 22. No abstract available.
Allaria B, Poli DM CD. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring: invasive vs. non-invasive. In: Anesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine - APICE. Italy: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 291-9.
Boyd O, Jackson N. How is risk defined in high-risk surgical patient management? Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):390-6. doi: 10.1186/cc3057. Epub 2005 Feb 9.
Goldfarb D, Poggio E. Etiology, pathogenesis, and management of renal failure. In: Wein A, Kavoussi L, Novick A, Partin A, Peters C, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2012. p. 1226-53.
Angelotti T, Lemmens H. Liver/Kidney/Pancreas transplantation. In: Jaffe R, Schmiesing C, Golianu B, editors. Anesthesiologist's Manual of Surgical Procedures. 5th editio. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2014. p. 1097-100.
Darovic G. Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive and noninvasive clinical applications. 3rd ed. Darovic G, editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2002. 191-260 p.
Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, Simon TP, Geisen M, Hoeft A, Siegenthaler N, Hofer CK. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):573-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet116. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
Kiefer N, Hofer CK, Marx G, Geisen M, Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Hoeft A, Bendjelid K, Rex S. Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters. Crit Care. 2012 May 30;16(3):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc11366.
Marque S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R73. doi: 10.1186/cc7884. Epub 2009 May 19.
Connor C. Commonly used monitoring techniques. In: Barash P, Cullen B, Stoelting R, Cahalan M, Stock C, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2013. p. 712-20.
Mehta Y, Arora D. Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring. World J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 26;6(9):1022-9. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.1022.
Porhomayon J, El-Solh A, Papadakos P, Nader ND. Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review. Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0738-9. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Chamos C, Vele L, Hamilton M, Cecconi M. Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization. Perioper Med (Lond). 2013 Sep 17;2(1):19. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-19.
Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1220-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130.
Frolich M. Cardiovascular monitoring. In: Butterworth J, Mackey D, Wasnick J, editors. Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013. p. 87-122.
Suttner S, Schollhorn T, Boldt J, Mayer J, Rohm KD, Lang K, Piper SN. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Dec;32(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0409-x. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
Fellahi JL, Caille V, Charron C, Deschamps-Berger PH, Vieillard-Baron A. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1553-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819cd97e.
Sodolski T, Kutarski A. Impedance cardiography: A valuable method of evaluating haemodynamic parameters. Cardiol J. 2007;14(2):115-26.
Monnet X, Teboul JL. Minimally invasive monitoring. Crit Care Clin. 2015 Jan;31(1):25-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.08.002.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IndonesiaUAnes032
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.