Pulse CONtour and BIoimpedance for Measurements of Stroke Volume During Changes in CARdiac Preload

NCT ID: NCT04231656

Last Updated: 2021-04-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-12

Study Completion Date

2020-05-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fluid therapy guided by stroke volume response to repeated fluid challenges is used for hemodynamic optimization during general anesthesia. Two types of devices that measure stroke volume non-invasively are primarily available for intermediate-risk surgery under general anesthesia. They are based on two different techniques, (1) pulse contour analysis, and (2) transthoracic bioimpedance. They have never been compared with each other. Therefore, it is not known (1) whether they are interchangeable for the measurement of stroke volume changes (usually assessed as the "concordance" of two techniques), and (2) whether one is better than the other.

The aim is to study the concordance of these two non-invasive hemodynamic devices. it will use both of them in patients undergoing intermediate risk surgery. They will be tested during modifications of cardiac preload induced by Trendelenburg and anti-Trendelenburg positioning, as well as during intraoperative fluid challenges, vasopressor boluses and alveolar recruitment maneuvers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main objective is to assess the concordance of two non-invasive devices using the technology described above : the Clearsight (Edwards Lifesciences, pulse contour analysis), and the Niccomo (Medis, bioimpedance). Both will be used in each patient included in the study. They will be tested during modifications of cardiac preload induced by sequences of position changes (see below) including Trendelenburg and anti-Trendelenburg positioning, performed systematically before and after the procedure, as well as during fluid challenges, vasopressor boluses and alveolar recruitment maneuvers (performed during the procedure according to the needs of the anesthesiologist in charge of the patient). Both monitors will also be compared with an invasive monitor of stroke volume (Vigileo/Flotrac, Edwards Lifesciences), and the respiratory pulse pressure variation will also be measured during the sequences of position changes and will be used as a gold standard for fluid responsiveness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodynamic, Monitoring Anesthesia Blood Pressure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

The primary outcome will be based on measurements performed during a sequence of position changes.

Sequence A will consist of starting from 0° position, shift to position +20°, then tilt to -20°, and finally back to the 0° position.

Sequence B will consist of starting from 0° position, shift to position -20°, then tilt to +20°, and finally back to the 0° position.

Patients will be randomized to take sequence A before the procedure, and then the sequence B at the end of the procedure, or vice-versa (sequence B before sequence A).

The randomization is not intended to compare the two groups with each other, but only to compensate for a possible"order-effect" in the execution of the maneuvers.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sequence A before sequence B

Patients eligible for intermediate risk surgery requiring the placement of an invasive continuous blood pressure measurement device and stroke volume monitoring for fluid management. Sequence A of positioning (before the procedure), and sequence B after the procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO measurements in sequence A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Starting from 0° position, shift to position +20°, then tilt to -20°, and finally back to the 0° position.

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO measurements in sequence B

Intervention Type DEVICE

Starting from 0° position, shift to position -20°, then tilt to +20°, and finally back to the 0° position and collect the last group of figures.

Sequence B before sequence A

Patients eligible for intermediate risk surgery requiring the placement of an invasive continuous blood pressure measurement device and stroke volume monitoring for fluid management. Sequence B of positioning before the procedure, and sequence A after the procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO measurements in sequence A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Starting from 0° position, shift to position +20°, then tilt to -20°, and finally back to the 0° position.

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO measurements in sequence B

Intervention Type DEVICE

Starting from 0° position, shift to position -20°, then tilt to +20°, and finally back to the 0° position and collect the last group of figures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO measurements in sequence A

Starting from 0° position, shift to position +20°, then tilt to -20°, and finally back to the 0° position.

Intervention Type DEVICE

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO measurements in sequence B

Starting from 0° position, shift to position -20°, then tilt to +20°, and finally back to the 0° position and collect the last group of figures.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO devices (both used during each sequence) CLEARSIGHT and NICCOMO devices (both used during each sequence)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible and suitable for intermediate risk surgery, validated by anaesthesia consultation.

There is no definitive definition of intermediate risk. By reference to the literature, surgeries longer than 2 hours (excluding "low risk") and less than 3% postoperative mortality (excluding high-risk surgery). It includes the majority of non-serious visceral (abdominal and gynecological) surgery, plastic or cervical-facial surgery for neoplastic removal or long-term reconstruction, or long-term spinal surgery or neurosurgery of the base of the skull.

\- For which the anesthesiologist in charge has planned an invasive monitoring (radial catheter) of arterial blood pressure.

Exclusion Criteria

* Urgent surgery
* Intracranial hypertension
* Orthostatic hypotension
* Extreme anthropometry: weight \>150 kg and 30 kg, size 120 cm and \>230 cm
* Related to NICCOMO monitoring:

* Rhythmic anomaly: Atrial fibrillation, tachycardia with heart rate \>200 beats per minute.
* Aortic disease: Severe sclerosis
* Valve dysfunction: severe aortic regurgitation,
* Patient with aortic prosthesis or pacemaker using impedance detection.
* Occurrence of tachycardia \> 200 bpm, occurrence of hypertension with mean arterial pressure \>130 mm Hg
* Simultaneous use of electrical cauterization systems during surgical procedures
* Septic shock
* Related to CLEARSIGHT monitoring

* Patient with prior distal perfusion disorders
* Lower extremity obliterans arteritis stage IV
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Lille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Benoit Tavernier, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Lille, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-A02697-50

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2019_46

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.