Comparison of Dynamic Fluid Responsiveness by EIT and Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Postoperative of CABG Patients
NCT ID: NCT04362033
Last Updated: 2020-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-22
2020-06-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Cardiac Output With LiDCO Rapid and TEE Against Thermodilution Technique in Cardiac Surgery
NCT02511457
IJV Sonogram VS Cardiometry in Fluid Responsiveness In CABG
NCT04618419
Focused Assessed Echocardiography to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
NCT03044405
Utility of the Superior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (SVC-CI) to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Surgical Revascularization
NCT06645327
Validation of Uncalibrated Cardiac Output Measurement With LiDCOrapid in the Resuscitation of Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study.
NCT04705493
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Before initiate the protocol, patients are submitted to a bolus of usual care doses of sedation and muscular blockage (Fentanyl, Midazolam and Cisatracurium).
To assess fluid responsiveness patients will be submitted to two different maneuvers applied in a random way: Passive Leg Raising (PLR) ant PEEP increment (PEEP). And after these maneuvers patients will receive a bolus of 500 ml of Lactated Ringer's.
Measurements are performed one minute after each of these conditions:
* Baseline: before both fluid responsiveness maneuvers, before and after Lactated Ringer infusion, patient is positioned in 450 semi-recumbent position;
* PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 450 semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 450;
* PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 450 semi-recumbent position
* Infusion of 500 mL of Ringer's; 450 semi-recumbent position.
Transpulmonary Thermodilution assessment are performed by the injection of 3 cold salines in bolus - the injection volume varied from 10 - 20mL according to the patient's actual weight and EIT assessment are performed by 1 injection of 10 mL of hypertonic saline at 7.5 - 10% according to the patient's actual weight.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PLR group
Patients will be submitted to two different fluid responsiveness maneuvers in a cross over randomization:
In PLR arm, patients will be submitted to the PLR maneuver (patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grade) firstly, then PEEP increment maneuver. At the end, all patients will receive a bolus of 500mL of Lactate Ringer's
Passive Leg Raising (PLR) and PEEP increment (PEEP)
PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grades; PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position
PEEP group
Patients will be submitted to two different fluid responsiveness maneuvers in a cross over randomization:
In PEEP arm, patients will be submitted to the PEEP maneuver (consisted in increase the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position) firstly, then PLR maneuver. At the end, all patients will receive a bolus of 500mL of Lactate Ringer's
Passive Leg Raising (PLR) and PEEP increment (PEEP)
PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grades; PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Passive Leg Raising (PLR) and PEEP increment (PEEP)
PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grades; PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age greater than 18 years old and less than 80 years old
* Written inform consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous renal replacement therapy
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40%
* Body mass index \> 40 kg/m2
* Atrial fibrillation
* Presence of cardiac pacemaker or another implantable electronic device
* Bleeding associated to hemodynamic instability
* Cardiac arrest or suspicion of neurological alteration
* Hemodynamic instability (norepinephrine dose \> 0.5 mcg/Kg/min)
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar
Associate Professor of Cardiology Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Heart Institute
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Braun F, Proenca M, Wendler A, Sola J, Lemay M, Thiran JP, Weiler N, Frerichs I, Becher T. Noninvasive measurement of stroke volume changes in critically ill patients by means of electrical impedance tomography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):903-911. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00402-z. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
90728718.7.0000.0068
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.