Comparison of Dynamic Fluid Responsiveness by EIT and Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Postoperative of CABG Patients

NCT ID: NCT04362033

Last Updated: 2020-04-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-22

Study Completion Date

2020-06-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the stroke volume variation measured by both methods: transpulmonary thermodilution and electrical impedance tomography (EIT), during fluid responsiveness maneuvers and after fluid replacement in the immediate postoperative of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. Patients will be hemodinamically monitored with the VolumeView set in combination with EV1000 clinical platform and the display of valuable volumetric parameters (Edwards Lifesciences, California, USA). Simultaneoulsy, patients will be monitored with Enlight Electrical Impedance Tomography (Timpel, São Paulo, Brazil). Hemodynamic data will be assessed at baseline 1, one minute after the passive leg raising maneuver, after PEEP increment, and after 500 mL of Lactated Ringer's (bolus infusion). Blood gases sample will be assessed before and immediatly after the protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the ICU, immediately after CABG surgery, patients are submitted to mechanical ventilation (volume-controlled mode with tidal volume = 8mL/Kg of PBW, PEEP = 8cmH2O and FiO2 = 60%, respiratory rate to maintain PaCO2 = 35 - 45 mmHg); hemodynamically monitored with VolumeView set in combination with EV1000 clinical platform and the display of volumetric parameters (Edwards Lifesciences, California, USA). Electrical impedance tomography monitoring (Enlight, Timpel, São Paulo, Brazil) is performed with a pair of electrodes belt attached around the thorax at 4Th - 6Th intercostal space, and a flow sensor attached between the orotracheal tube and the Y connector from the ventilator.

Before initiate the protocol, patients are submitted to a bolus of usual care doses of sedation and muscular blockage (Fentanyl, Midazolam and Cisatracurium).

To assess fluid responsiveness patients will be submitted to two different maneuvers applied in a random way: Passive Leg Raising (PLR) ant PEEP increment (PEEP). And after these maneuvers patients will receive a bolus of 500 ml of Lactated Ringer's.

Measurements are performed one minute after each of these conditions:

* Baseline: before both fluid responsiveness maneuvers, before and after Lactated Ringer infusion, patient is positioned in 450 semi-recumbent position;
* PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 450 semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 450;
* PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 450 semi-recumbent position
* Infusion of 500 mL of Ringer's; 450 semi-recumbent position.

Transpulmonary Thermodilution assessment are performed by the injection of 3 cold salines in bolus - the injection volume varied from 10 - 20mL according to the patient's actual weight and EIT assessment are performed by 1 injection of 10 mL of hypertonic saline at 7.5 - 10% according to the patient's actual weight.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Fluid Therapy Stroke Volume Hemodynamic Monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Patients will be submitted to two different fluid responsiveness maneuvers in a cross over randomization.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PLR group

Patients will be submitted to two different fluid responsiveness maneuvers in a cross over randomization:

In PLR arm, patients will be submitted to the PLR maneuver (patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grade) firstly, then PEEP increment maneuver. At the end, all patients will receive a bolus of 500mL of Lactate Ringer's

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Passive Leg Raising (PLR) and PEEP increment (PEEP)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grades; PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position

PEEP group

Patients will be submitted to two different fluid responsiveness maneuvers in a cross over randomization:

In PEEP arm, patients will be submitted to the PEEP maneuver (consisted in increase the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position) firstly, then PLR maneuver. At the end, all patients will receive a bolus of 500mL of Lactate Ringer's

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Passive Leg Raising (PLR) and PEEP increment (PEEP)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grades; PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Passive Leg Raising (PLR) and PEEP increment (PEEP)

PLR: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which patient is positioned from 45 grade of semi-recumbent position to dorsal decubitus and the legs are raised at 45 grades; PEEP increment: Fluid responsiveness maneuver which consisted in increased the PEEP level 5 cmH2O above the mean airway pressure, patient is positioned in 45 grade of semi-recumbent position

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective CABG surgery
* Age greater than 18 years old and less than 80 years old
* Written inform consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous pulmonary disease or pulmonary hypertension
* Previous renal replacement therapy
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40%
* Body mass index \> 40 kg/m2
* Atrial fibrillation
* Presence of cardiac pacemaker or another implantable electronic device
* Bleeding associated to hemodynamic instability
* Cardiac arrest or suspicion of neurological alteration
* Hemodynamic instability (norepinephrine dose \> 0.5 mcg/Kg/min)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar

Associate Professor of Cardiology Department

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Heart Institute

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ludhmila A Hajjar, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

11-26615000 ext. 5232

Rafael M Ianotti, PT

Role: CONTACT

11-995989126

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ludhmila A Hajjar, MD, PhD

Role: primary

11-26615232

Rafael Ianotti, PT

Role: backup

11-995989126

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Braun F, Proenca M, Wendler A, Sola J, Lemay M, Thiran JP, Weiler N, Frerichs I, Becher T. Noninvasive measurement of stroke volume changes in critically ill patients by means of electrical impedance tomography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):903-911. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00402-z. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31624996 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

90728718.7.0000.0068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.