Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
64 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-08-31
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Cardiac Output With LiDCO Rapid and TEE Against Thermodilution Technique in Cardiac Surgery
NCT02511457
Evaluation of Non-invasive Continuous Hemodynamic Measurement From Task Force CORE
NCT06007196
Hemodynamic Measurements During Liver Transplantation
NCT00682110
Comparison of Dynamic Fluid Responsiveness by EIT and Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Postoperative of CABG Patients
NCT04362033
Validation of Uncalibrated Cardiac Output Measurement With LiDCOrapid in the Resuscitation of Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study.
NCT04705493
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
No previous study was done to specifically find out the hemodynamic component that differs between these tools intraoperatively in varying hemodynamic conditions during cardiac surgery although there were few studies compared the trend in the cardiac output with difference in opinion on their accuracy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LIDCO Rapid, Pulmonary artery catheter
Hemodynamic monitoring systems
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
28 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Iowa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sudhakar Subramani, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R212. doi: 10.1186/cc9335. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
Broch O, Renner J, Hocker J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schottler J, Steinfath M, Bein B. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R76. doi: 10.1186/cc10065. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201504777
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.