Comparison of Cardiac Index (CI) Measurements Performed With Different Methods
NCT ID: NCT05236426
Last Updated: 2022-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-28
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Montiroing Cardiac Index by Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Transesophageal Echocardiography During Liver Transplantation
NCT06899867
Transpulmonary Thermodilution Using an Implented Central Venous Access Port
NCT02357953
Uncalibrated Pulse Contour to Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Off Pump Cardiac Surgery
NCT06822361
Correlation of Cardiac Output Determined by Echocardiography and Indirect Calorimetry in Critically Ill Patients in Cardiogenic Shock on Extracorporeal Circulatory Life Support
NCT06369818
Echocardiographic Assessment of the Right Ventricle in Healthy Subjects During Stress Test in the Mexican Population
NCT04286854
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Exclusions: Age under 18, presence of pleural effusion or pericardium (confirmed by chest X-ray and / or ultrasound / echocardiography), presence of aortic / mitral valve disease, presence of an implanted pacemaker CI measurements will be performed simultaneously for 5 minutes. The CI value measured by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique will be obtained with the PiCCO system (Pulsiocat PV8115; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany). Measurements will be made three times within 5 minutes. For statistical purposes, the value of the arithmetic mean of the obtained results will be used.
The CI value as measured by the bioreactance method will be determined using the monitor: Starling Fluid Management System (Baxter International Inc, USA). This monitor uses bioreactance technology to determine hemodynamic parameters and bioimpedance technology to measure thoracic fluid content (TFC). The test data will be recorded with two pairs of electrodes placed on the chest according to the manufacturer's instructions. Measurements documented at 30-second intervals will concern 10 measurement cycles. The average of the obtained results will be subjected to statistical analysis.
Echocardiographic examination of the heart to determine the value of CI will be performed by one (always the same) qualified (certified in echocardiographic examinations) clinician.
Echocardiographic measurements will begin with determining the diameter of the left ventricular outflow tract (left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area, LVOT-CSA). Then, three subvalvular velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) measurements will be made over the course of 5 minutes. This measurement will be performed in the apical five-chamber projection.
The stroke volume (SV) value will be calculated as: SV = LVOT-CSA x LVOT-VTI. The CI value will be calculated using the formula: CI = SV x heart rate (HR) / body surface area (BSA). The CI value archived for further statistical analysis will be the average of three measurements performed within 5 minutes.
Other variables that will be documented simultaneously with CI measurements: patient gender and weight, use of vasospastic / inotropic drugs (dose mcg / kg / min), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), presence of pulmonary hypertension.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of pleural effusion or pericardium (confirmed by chest X-ray and / or ultrasound / echocardiography)
* Presence of aortic / mitral valve pathology
* Presence of an implanted pacemaker
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jan Adamski
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Geerts BF, Aarts LP, Jansen JR. Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;71(3):316-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03798.x.
Demiselle J, Mercat A, Asfar P. Is there still a place for the Swan-Ganz catheter? Yes. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):954-956. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5158-0. Epub 2018 May 23. No abstract available.
Kobe J, Mishra N, Arya VK, Al-Moustadi W, Nates W, Kumar B. Cardiac output monitoring: Technology and choice. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):6-17. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_41_18.
Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Jul;293(1):H583-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00195.2007. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1191-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0640-0. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008 Apr;22(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
Porter TR, Shillcutt SK, Adams MS, Desjardins G, Glas KE, Olson JJ, Troughton RW. Guidelines for the use of echocardiography as a monitor for therapeutic intervention in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):40-56. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.09.009. No abstract available.
Malik SB, Chen N, Parker RA 3rd, Hsu JY. Transthoracic Echocardiography: Pitfalls and Limitations as Delineated at Cardiac CT and MR Imaging. Radiographics. 2017 Mar-Apr;37(2):383-406. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160105. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
Ling HZ, Gallardo-Arozena M, Company-Calabuig AM, Nicolaides KH, Kametas NA. Clinical validation of bioreactance for the measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy. Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1307-1313. doi: 10.1111/anae.15110. Epub 2020 May 29.
Lamia B, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Feb;32(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-9983-4. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UWMOlsztyn
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.