Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Municipal Acute Wards Versus a General Hospital
NCT ID: NCT03885206
Last Updated: 2024-11-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-01
2021-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims at assessing the outcome of admissions to MAWs compared to a general hospital for patients in need of acute care, that can be treated at a lower and decentralized level of health care, with potentially less resources than traditional hospitalizations. The study will use a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design. It builds on previous research and systematic reviews, and aims to assess several outcomes, patient experiences (NORPEQ), health-related quality of life, short-term mortality and morbidity, and draws on linkages to national registers. The primary hypothesis is that there is no difference in patient experiences between admissions to a MAW versus a hospital. The secondary hypothesis was that there is no difference in outcomes such as readmission, length of stay, self-assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by the EuroQol 5 items 5 level (EQ-5D-5L) index, and health status measured by the RAND-12, between patients admitted to a MAW versus a hospital
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Unannounced Periodic Surveys on Public Hospitals
NCT02348567
Electronic Referral and Booking of Outpatient Day Case Surgery Compared With Traditional Referral Routines.
NCT00692497
Risk Factors for Community- and Workplace Transmission of COVID-19
NCT04320732
Impact of a Permanently Maintained Healthcare Multidisciplinary Facility (PASS-MULTI) on Unscheduled Readmissions at 12 Months for Persons in Precarious Situations.
NCT03986801
A Prospective Randomised Control Trial to Study the Effectiveness of a Health Service Innovation Using a Modified Virtual Ward Model to Prevent Unscheduled Readmission of High Risk Patients
NCT02325752
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hospital
Level of healthcare service: Patients who can be admitted to a municipal acute ward (MAW) will be admitted to the hospital instead, so that the intervention is that patients are admitted to a higher level facility than needed. Recieve medical treatment as usual.
Level of healthcare services
Patiens judged to be eligible for admittance to a municipal acute care wrad will be admitted to hospital as an intervnetion, to be able to compare same patient groups.
Municipal acute ward
Patients admitted to decentralized, municipal acute care wards after being assessed by a referring physician.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Level of healthcare services
Patiens judged to be eligible for admittance to a municipal acute care wrad will be admitted to hospital as an intervnetion, to be able to compare same patient groups.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to provide written, informed consent
* Eligible for admission at a MAW according to established admission criteria
* Assessed and referred by a GP, by a physician at the local Casualty (Legevaktslege), or a physician in a nursing home on the same day
Exclusion Criteria
* No Norwegian national identification number
* Acute disability in elderly, requiring extensive diagnostic procedures
* Patients admitted to the MAW via the diagnostic loop\*
* Previous admission to a MAW during the project period (to prevent patients being included more than once in the project)
* Insufficient Norwegian language skills to respond to the questionnaires
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Extrastiftelsen, Akersgatab28, No-0158Oslo, Norway
OTHER_GOV
The National Association for Heart and Lung Disease, Jessheim, Norway
OTHER
University of Oslo
OTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Ostfold Hospital Trust
OTHER
Ostfold University College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ann-Chatrin Leonardsen
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan Sütterlin, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Ostfold University College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Sarpsborg, Østfold fylke, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HS2522-40480
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.