Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Municipal Acute Wards Versus a General Hospital (NCT NCT03885206)
NCT ID: NCT03885206
Last Updated: 2024-11-04
Results Overview
Norwegian Patient Experience Questionnaire. Six of the eight NORPEQ items sum to produce an overall scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible experience of care. If respondents had missing values on more than half of the items, mean scores will be imputed.
COMPLETED
NA
164 participants
2-4 weeks after discharge
2024-11-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Hospital
Level of healthcare service: Patients who can be admitted to a municipal acute ward (MAW) will be admitted to the hospital instead, so that the intervention is that patients are admitted to a higher level facility than needed. Recieve medical treatment as usual.
Level of healthcare services: Patiens judged to be eligible for admittance to a municipal acute care wrad will be admitted to hospital as an intervnetion, to be able to compare same patient groups.
|
Municipal Acute Ward
Patients admitted to decentralized, municipal acute care wards after being assessed by a referring physician.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
49
|
115
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
26
|
70
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
45
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Hospital
n=49 Participants
Level of healthcare service: Patients who can be admitted to a municipal acute ward (MAW) will be admitted to the hospital instead, so that the intervention is that patients are admitted to a higher level facility than needed. Recieve medical treatment as usual.
Level of healthcare services: Patiens judged to be eligible for admittance to a municipal acute care wrad will be admitted to hospital as an intervnetion, to be able to compare same patient groups.
|
Municipal Acute Ward
n=115 Participants
Patients admitted to decentralized, municipal acute care wards after being assessed by a referring physician.
|
Total
n=164 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.9 • n=49 Participants
|
70.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.6 • n=115 Participants
|
69.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4 • n=164 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=49 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
EQ-5D index
|
0.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=49 Participants
|
0.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=115 Participants
|
0.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=164 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-4 weeks after dischargeNorwegian Patient Experience Questionnaire. Six of the eight NORPEQ items sum to produce an overall scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible experience of care. If respondents had missing values on more than half of the items, mean scores will be imputed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hospital
n=49 Participants
Level of healthcare service: Patients who can be admitted to a municipal acute ward (MAW) will be admitted to the hospital instead, so that the intervention is that patients are admitted to a higher level facility than needed. Recieve medical treatment as usual.
Level of healthcare services: Patiens judged to be eligible for admittance to a municipal acute care wrad will be admitted to hospital as an intervnetion, to be able to compare same patient groups.
|
Municipal Acute Ward
n=115 Participants
Patients admitted to decentralized, municipal acute care wards after being assessed by a referring physician.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Experiences, NORPEQ
|
78.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
80.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysNumber of deaths within 30 days after discharge, all causes
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysNumber of re-admissions to hospital or MAW within 30 days after discharge, all causes
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 daysNumber of days patients are admitted to either hospital or MAW
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsNumber of inpatient stays in a healthcare institution
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1,5 yearNumber of patients transferred from MAW to hospital
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeks after dischargeAs measured by the NORPEQ questionnaire. The questionnaire consist of eight items. The overall scale goes from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible experience of care. The
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeks after dischargeThe RAND-12 health status inventory (aka SF-12) is a commonly used health status instrument, which was developed as part of the Medical outcomes study in the 1980s. It uses 12 items from the SF-36 and can be aggregated to a physical health component score and an mental health component score.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1,5 yearHealth related quality of life. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Hospital
Municipal Acute Ward
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Senior Consultant
Landsforeningen for hjerte- og lungesyke
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place