Effect Evaluation of Independent Medical Evaluation (IME) in Norway

NCT ID: NCT02524392

Last Updated: 2018-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7642 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled trial comparing independent medical evaluation (IME) to treatment as usual (TAU). Participants will be individuals reaching six months uninterrupted sickness absence. Treatment as usual (TAU) is normal follow-up by a general practitioner (GP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized controlled trial in a Norwegian context, involving an effect evaluation, a cost-benefit evaluation and a qualitative evaluation. Independent medical evaluation (IME) will be compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Independent medical evaluation (IME) will comprise a consultation with an independent general practitioner (IME GP) who will assess whether the sick listed worker has been given eligible and available opportunities in return to work follow-up in Norway. The independent medical evaluation general practitioner (IME GP) will write a short report that is sent to the treating general practitioner as input from a colleague. The report can be used in the follow-up of the sick listed participant. The participants in the treatment as usual (TAU) group will not receive any other follow-up than normal follow-up by the treating general practitioner. The qualitative evaluation will be conducted to gain insight into the experiences of the general practitioners and the participants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

All International Classification of Primary Care 2 Diagnoses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Independent medical evaluation

Independent medical evaluation (IME) of another doctor than the treating general practitioner.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Independent medical evaluation

Intervention Type OTHER

The independent medical evaluation (IME) will be performed by specialists in general medicine, temporarily hired by the county welfare service. The independent medical evaluation (IME) procedure is developed by the Research Unit for General Practice at Uni Research Health in Norway.

Treatment as usual

Treatment as usual by the treating general practitioner. There will be one randomized control group in one county. Sick-listed in other counties serve as an extra control group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Independent medical evaluation

The independent medical evaluation (IME) will be performed by specialists in general medicine, temporarily hired by the county welfare service. The independent medical evaluation (IME) procedure is developed by the Research Unit for General Practice at Uni Research Health in Norway.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants on sick leave with an International Classification of Primary Care-2 diagnosis will be recruited through the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration's (NAV) registries, when reaching 22 weeks of sick leave (full or graded).

Exclusion Criteria

* People with International Classification of Disease-10 diagnoses, cancer or dementia.
* People who are pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

66 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Silje Maeland, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Uni Research Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uni Research

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maeland S, Holmas TH, Oyeflaten I, Husabo E, Werner EL, Monstad K. What is the effect of independent medical evaluation on days on sickness benefits for long-term sick listed employees in Norway? A pragmatic randomised controlled trial, the NIME-trial. BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12800-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35216560 (View on PubMed)

Oyeflaten I, Maeland S, Haukenes I. Independent medical evaluation of general practitioners' follow-up of sick-listed patients: a cross-sectional study in Norway. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e032776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032776.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32193258 (View on PubMed)

Aamland A, Husabo E, Maeland S. Independent medical evaluation for sick-listed patients: a focus group study of GPs expectations and experiences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3481-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30157844 (View on PubMed)

Husabo E, Monstad K, Holmas TH, Oyeflaten I, Werner EL, Maeland S. Protocol for the effect evaluation of independent medical evaluation after six months sick leave: a randomized controlled trial of independent medical evaluation versus treatment as usual in Norway. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4469-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28615017 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UniResearch

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.