A Randomised Trial of Expedited Transfer to a Cardiac Arrest Centre for Non-ST Elevation Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

NCT ID: NCT03872960

Last Updated: 2024-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

862 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-02

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of ARREST is to determine the best post-resuscitation care pathway for out of hospital cardiac arrest patients without ST-segment elevation. The investigators propose that changes to emergency management comprising expedited delivery to a specialist heart attack centre with organised post-cardiac arrest care including immediate access to reperfusion therapy will reduce mortality in patients without STE compared to the current standard of care, which comprises protracted pre-hospital management of the patient without definitive care plan and delivery to geographically closest hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global public health issue. There are 60,000 cardiac arrests per year in the United Kingdom (UK), of which resuscitation is attempted in just under half. Resuscitation attempts are successful in up to 30%. However, more than two thirds of patients who survive to hospital admission die before discharge. There is wide variation in both regional and inter-hospital survival rates from OHCA; this disparity is also present across London. This variation has been shown to be attributable to hospital infrastructure, resources and personnel rather than patient characteristics. Overall survival therefore remains poor, at 7%.

It is well known that the majority of OHCA are secondary to an acute cardiac ischaemic event. Coronary artery disease is responsible for more than 70% of OHCA of presumed cardiac cause, with acute occlusion demonstrated in 50% of consecutive patients taken for immediate coronary angiography (ICA). Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation, with ICA and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a cardiac arrest centre (CAC), prevents re-arrest, preserves myocardial function and has been shown to improve post-arrest outcomes in ST-segment elevation (STE). The management of patients without STE however is controversial, with a delayed approach to intervention. Despite recently published data suggesting PCI in non-STE resulted in a two-fold increase in favourable outcome, randomised data are lacking. Emergent reperfusion therapies come with a weak recommendation from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), and a Class IIa recommendation by the American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC), if there is a high suspicion of ongoing infarction.

The European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) recommends a prior rule-out of non-cardiac cause in the emergency department followed by coronary angiography within 2 hours. It remains unclear if time-critical, definitive hospital based management of the post-arrest patient without STE in a specialist centre improves outcomes, and there has been variable uptake of this strategy both pre-hospital and amongst the interventional cardiology community.

There is an urgent need for a randomised controlled trial examining the benefits of early delivery of post-cardiac arrest care in specialist centres, specifically in the absence of STE. Post-arrest care is time-critical, requires a multi-disciplinary approach and may be more optimally delivered in centres with greater provider experience. ILCOR and the EAPCI state that randomised trials are essential in this population to determine if timely delivery by the ambulance services to a CAC with organised postcardiac arrest care including immediate access to reperfusion therapy improves survival. There are no randomised trials and only indirect evidence that CAC and systems of care may be effective and only two observational studies examining the role of immediate ICA±PCI in the absence of STE. This is an important and topical question as there is a drive to regionalise care for all patients into CACs.

To address this, ARREST will enroll 860 OHCA patients with ROSC to a randomised clinical trial. Each arm of the trial will include 430 patients.

The two arms are as follows:

Intervention Arm: Direct to CAC The intervention arm consists of activation of the pre-hospital triaging system currently in place for post-arrest STE patients. This involves pre-alert of the CAC and strategic delivery of the patient to the catheter laboratory (24 hours a day, 7 days a week). Patients will receive definitive post-resuscitation care: intubation and ventilation, where necessary, targeted temperature management, and goal directed therapies including evaluation and identification of underlying cause of arrest with access to immediate reperfusion if necessary. Prognostication will occur no earlier than 72 hours post-cardiac arrest to prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Transfer times estimated from the 40-patient pilot are anticipated to be 100 minutes (median; IQR 75 to 113) from time of arrest to the designated centre.

Control Arm: Standard of Care The control arm comprises the current standard of pre-hospital advanced life support (ALS) care management for patients with ROSC following cardiac arrest of suspected cardiac aetiology. The patient is conveyed to the geographically closest emergency department. Management thereafter will be as per standard hospital protocols however as in the intervention arm, prognostication is to be delayed in trial patients until at least 72 hours post arrest.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Arm: Expedited transfer to a CAC

The intervention arm consists of activation of the pre-hospital triaging system currently in place for post-arrest STE patients. This involves pre-alert of the CAC and strategic delivery of the patient to the catheter laboratory (24 hours a day, 7 days a week). Patients will receive definitive post-resuscitation care: intubation and ventilation, where necessary, targeted temperature management, and goal directed therapies including evaluation and identification of underlying cause of arrest with access to immediate reperfusion if necessary. Prognostication will occur no earlier than 72 hours post-cardiac arrest to prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Transfer times estimated from the 40-patient pilot are anticipated to be 100 minutes (median; IQR 75 to 113) from time of arrest to the designated centre.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transfer to cardiac arrest centre

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in the intervention arm will be taken directly to a the catheter lab of a heart attack centre.

Control Arm: Current standard of care

The control arm comprises the current standard of pre-hospital advanced life support (ALS) care management for patients with ROSC following cardiac arrest of suspected cardiac aetiology. The patient is conveyed to the geographically closest emergency department. Management thereafter will be as per standard hospital protocols however as in the intervention arm, prognostication is to be delayed in trial patients until at least 72 hours post arrest.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transfer to cardiac arrest centre

Patients in the intervention arm will be taken directly to a the catheter lab of a heart attack centre.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
* Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
* Age 18 or over (known or presumed)

Exclusion Criteria

* Criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction on 12-Lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
* Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) Order
* Cardiac arrest suffered after care pathway set and patient en route
* Suspected pregnancy
* Presumed non-cardiac cause (for example; trauma, drowning, suicide, drug overdose)
* Presumed significant trauma/injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barts & The London NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon Redwood, MBBS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust

Dartford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Barts Health NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

BHR University Hospitals NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Croydon Health Services NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS FT

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kingston Hospital NHS FT

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London North West University Healthcare

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Watford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Patterson T, Perkins A, Perkins GD, Clayton T, Evans R, Nguyen H, Wilson K, Whitbread M, Hughes J, Fothergill RT, Nevett J, Mosweu I, McCrone P, Dalby M, Rakhit R, MacCarthy P, Perera D, Nolan JP, Redwood SR. Rationale and design of: A Randomized tRial of Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest center for non-ST elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The ARREST randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Oct;204:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30092413 (View on PubMed)

Patterson T, Perkins GD, Perkins A, Clayton T, Evans R, Dodd M, Robertson S, Wilson K, Mellett-Smith A, Fothergill RT, McCrone P, Dalby M, MacCarthy P, Firoozi S, Malik I, Rakhit R, Jain A, Nolan JP, Redwood SR; ARREST trial collaborators. Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST-elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ARREST): a UK prospective, multicentre, parallel, randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1329-1337. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01351-X. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37647928 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://arrest.lshtm.ac.uk/

ARREST Trial Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ISRCTN96585404

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MJKTUAR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RECOMMEND Platform Trial
NCT06526533 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3
The Intensive Care Platform Trial
NCT06667999 RECRUITING PHASE4
Nebulised Rt-PA for ARDS Due to COVID-19
NCT04356833 COMPLETED PHASE2