Effects of Virtual Reality on Transtibial Amputation Physiotherapy Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT03872193

Last Updated: 2019-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-10

Study Completion Date

2018-06-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality applications on quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and gait parameters in individuals with transtibial amputation. 20 Transtibial amputee were included in study. All participants were using transtibial prothesis with active vacuum system at least 1 year. Participants were divided into two groups. While a group of virtual reality applications were being performed additionally standart physiotherapy, only standard physiotherapy methods were applied in the second group. Balance and gait practices were performed for each group. Individuals were treated for 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and individuals were evaluated before and after treatment. Individuals were evaluated for quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and time-distance parameters of walking.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of virtual reality applications on quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and gait parameters in individuals with transtibial amputation.20 transtibial amputee with 36 mean age were included in study. All participants were using transtibial prothesis with active vacuum system at least 1 year. Participants were divided into two groups. While a group of virtual reality applications were being performed, standard physiotherapy methods were applied in the second group. Balance and gait practices were performed for each group. Individuals were treated for 3 days a week for 4 weeks, and individuals were evaluated before and after treatment. Individuals were evaluated for quality of life, performance, balance, prosthesis adaptation and time-distance parameters of walking.

For this purpose, SF-36 Questionnaire, 6-minute walking test, one leg rest time, Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scale, wearable biometric device and footprint method were utilized. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in pre-treatment and post-treatment performance, balance and gait parameters in the groups of individuals (p \<0.05). The quality of life pain parameter was statistically decline in the group receiving virtual reality (p\<0.05). On the other hand, significant differences in the quality of life and prosthesis adaptation of the individuals were not found between the groups (p\> 0.05). The results of this study showed that virtual reality practices and standard physiotherapy methods are effective on performance, balance and walking in transtibial amputee rehabilitation. It is thought that it will be important to perform virtual reality applications in amputee rehabilitation separately in both methods, in addition to standard physiotherapy methods, to include in rehabilitation process, to bring an ability of alternative application to professionals working in this area and to work about amputees with using different suspension systems and with different amputation levels.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Virtual Reality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One group only physiotherapy second group takes physiotherapy and virtual reality exercises.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Physio Therapy

We intervention this group some routine exercises. They had balance exercises, gait training,incline surface gait,bloked surface gait training and recreational activities. Extremity strengthenin exercises,balance exercises and increasing endurance are applied for this amputees.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Virtual Reality Exercies

Virtual Reality

This group had physical therapy program plus virtual reality exercises. They had balance exercises, gait training,incline surface gait,bloked surface gait training and recreational activities. Extremity strengthenin exercises,balance exercises and increasing endurance are applied for this amputees. And virtual reality exercises were done for this group. Skiing,kayak, football,rafting and jumping activities were done in this exerciese.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Virtual Reality Exercies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exercise

Virtual Reality Exercies

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* transtibial and unilateral amputation
* At least 1 year prothesis usage, 18- 65 year age,
* At least 15 min independent walking ability,
* Stabile stump volume,
* Standart stump lentgh,
* Enough kognition for evaluation and tests.

Exclusion Criteria

* walking and other activities to prevent; shortness of muscle, limitation of joint motion and phantom pain in stump, presence of any discomfort or systemic health problem that may affect the gait outside the amputation
* presence of visual problems to prevent participation in virtual reality applications,
* use of walking aids
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatih Erbahceci

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yildirim Sahan T, Erbahceci F. Effects of Virtual Reality on Transtibial Amputation Rehabilitation Outcomes: A Randomized Study. Games Health J. 2023 Dec;12(6):459-467. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2023.0052. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37934289 (View on PubMed)

B Aledi L, Flumignan CD, Trevisani VF, Miranda F Jr. Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 5;6(6):CD013711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013711.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37276273 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Virtual Reality Physiotherapy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Virtual Reality Use for ICU Mobility
NCT07234201 RECRUITING NA