The Effectiveness of a Stress Incontinence Care Protocol
NCT ID: NCT03866356
Last Updated: 2019-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-01
2018-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stress Management on Nursing Students
NCT05337800
Comfort Theory-Based Nursing Interventions in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT05589194
The Effect of Two Dıfferent Technıques Used in Psychomotor Skılls Traınıng on Nursıng Students
NCT06235060
The Effect of Mindfulness Program on Clinical Stress Nursing Students
NCT06259955
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Based Group Psychoeducation for Nursing Students
NCT06553703
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Information and evidence needs to be translated into nursing practice and applied to clinical decision-making in stress incontinence cases. Evidence-based study models such as the Star model provide guidance on using evidence to develop clinical guidelines and care protocols. The Star model is designed to improve patient outcomes by creating a bridge between research and clinical practice. There is currently no published stress incontinence care protocol based on the Star model. Although there is one published study of a care protocol for urinary incontinence, this protocol was not drawn up on the basis of an evidence-based model.
Women that matched the sample criteria were recruited into the study. After their consent was obtained, the women were randomized into an intervention and a control group. The women in the intervention group were provided care according to stress incontinence care protocol. The control group received no intervention during the eight-week intervention period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
The intervention group received care according to the SICP (Table 2). One of the researchers gave each participant one-on-one education in line with SICP. They were also provided with the booklet that had been prepared in accordance with SICP. The participants were phoned every week for eight weeks and offered counseling within the scope of SICP and then were reevaluated at the end of eight weeks (Post-intervention). The participants were followed from the eighth to the twelfth week without any intervention (4-week post-intervention).
intervention group
The women in the intervention group were provided care according to SICP
Control group
The control group received no intervention during the eight-week intervention period. The control group received standard care. The women were given no educational materials.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intervention group
The women in the intervention group were provided care according to SICP
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The inclusion criteria were being female, ≥ 18 years, having an initial diagnosis of SI, being literate, having no sensory disorder affecting communication, and agreeing to participate in the research
Exclusion Criteria:
* The exclusion criteria were pregnancy, presence of a urinary tract infection and previous treatment for SI. The removal criteria were patient non-compliance with the protocol, failure in contacting the patient and the patient's wish to withdraw from the study.
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kırıkkale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emel Gülnar
Research Assistant
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kaya S, Akbayrak T, Toprak Celenay S, Dolgun A, Ekici G, Beksac S. Reliability and validity of the Turkish King's Health Questionnaire in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2786-6. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP, Rosier PF, Valansky L, Martan A, Zvara P. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jun;33(5):507-10. doi: 10.1002/nau.22436. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
Stevens KR. The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. Online J Issues Nurs. 2013 May 31;18(2):4.
Schaffer MA, Sandau KE, Diedrick L. Evidence-based practice models for organizational change: overview and practical applications. J Adv Nurs. 2013 May;69(5):1197-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06122.x. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
Zengin N, Pinar R. Reliability and validity of the continence self-efficacy scale in Turkish women with urinary incontinence. Nurs Health Sci. 2012 Sep;14(3):277-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00692.x. Epub 2012 May 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.