The SAFE-Trial: Awake Craniotomy Versus Surgery Under General Anesthesia for Glioblastoma Patients.
NCT ID: NCT03861299
Last Updated: 2023-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
246 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-01
2027-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prognostic Impact of Surgical Resection Extent for Supratentorial High Grade Gliomas.
NCT03997136
Strategic Intervention on Preserving Motor Function During Awake Craniotomy
NCT05143788
Awake vs. Asleep Craniotomy for Non-eloquent Gliomas
NCT03621748
Natural History of Brain Function, Quality of Life, and Seizure Control in Patients With Brain Tumor Who Have Undergone Surgery
NCT01417507
Prospective Surgical Study on the Pattern of Electrical Activity in High Grade Glioma as a Predictor of Progression
NCT05565118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective The study is performed to increase safety and efficacy during surgery in patients with GBM in eloquent areas. This study will compare awake craniotomy with surgery under general anesthesia for patients with GBM near or in eloquent areas. Primary end points are: 1) Proportion of patients with NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) deterioration at 6 weeks post- surgery, where deterioration is defined as at least one point increase in total NIHSS score compared to baseline. 2) Proportion of patients without residual contrast-enhancing tumour on postoperative MRI. Secondary end points are: 1) Health related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after operation. 2) Progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 months after operation. 3) Overall survival (OS) at 12 months after operation. 4) Frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Effects in each group: Infections, intracranial bleeding, epilepsy, aphasia, paresis/paralysis in arms or/and legs. Also, a cost benefit analysis will be performed.
Study design The trial is set up as a multicenter randomized controlled study. The study will include 246 patients in 5 neurosurgical centers in the Netherlands. Patients with GBM in eloquent areas on diagnostic MRI will be selected by the neurosurgeons according to the eligibility criteria. After informed consent the patient will be randomized for awake craniotomy (AC) or regular craniotomy under general anesthesia (GA) with 1:1 allocation ratio. After surgery, only patients with histologically proven GBM will continue with the study. Patients in whom no GBM could not be proven histologically, will be considered off-study. Thereafter, patients will receive the standard treatment with concomitant Temozolomide and radiation therapy and standard follow up. Total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years. Follow-up is 1 year.
Study population Patients aged 18-90 years old, with Glioblastoma Multiforme near or in eloquent areas and eligible for awake craniotomy.
Intervention Awake craniotomy compared to craniotomy under general anaesthesia
Main study parameters/endpoints
1. Proportion of patients with NIHSS deterioration at 6 weeks post-surgery
2. Proportion of patients without residual contrast-enhancing tumour on postoperative MRI
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness Patients have 50% chance to be randomized for an awake procedure. The risk-benefit-ratio of this procedure in patients with GBM is subject of this trial and the investigators expect less neurological morbidity than surgery under generalised anaesthesia. Three quality of life questionnaires and 1 neurological examination will take place preoperatively, 6 weeks after, 3 months after and 6 months after the surgery. The burden of this trial for the patient is therefore confined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Awake craniotomy
Cortical stimulation is performed with a bipolar electrical stimulator. The Boston naming test and repetition of words is done in cooperation with a neuropsychologist/linguist, who will inform the neurosurgeon of any kind of speech arrest or dysarthria. When localizing the motor and sensory cortex, the patient is asked to report any unintended movement or sensation in extremities or face. Functional cortical areas are marked with a number. When the tumour margins or white matter is encountered or when on regular neuronavigation the eloquent white matter tracts are thought to be in close proximity, subcortical stimulation (biphasic currents of 8-16 mA, pulse frequency 60 Hz, single pulse phase duration of 100 microsec., 2-second train) is performed to localize functional tracts.
Awake craniotomy
Awake craniotomy
Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Trephination and tumour resection are performed without any additional neuro-psychological monitoring or brain mapping, guided by STEALTH-neuronavigation.
Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Awake craniotomy
Awake craniotomy
Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Craniotomy under general anesthesia
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Tumor diagnosed as Glioblastoma Multiforme on MRI with distinct ring-like pattern of contrast enhancement with thick irregular walls and a core area reduced signal suggestive of tumour necrosis as assessed by the surgeon
3. Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract or speech areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)
4. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
5. Karnofsky performance scale 80 or more
6. Written Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Multifocal contrast enhancing lesions
3. Substantial non-contrast enhancing tumor areas suggesting low grade gliomas with malignant transformation
4. Medical reasons precluding MRI (eg, pacemaker)
5. Inability to give consent because of or language barrier
6. Psychiatric history
7. Previous brain tumour surgery
8. Previous low-grade glioma.
9. Second primary malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of any organ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
10. Severe aphasia or dysphasia
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
OTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Medical Center Haaglanden
OTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Jasper Gerritsen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jasper Gerritsen
Study Coordinator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arnaud Vincent, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, , Belgium
Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Medical Center Haaglanden
The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gerritsen JKW, Zwarthoed RH, Kilgallon JL, Nawabi NL, Jessurun CAC, Versyck G, Pruijn KP, Fisher FL, Lariviere E, Solie L, Mekary RA, Satoer DD, Schouten JW, Bos EM, Kloet A, Nandoe Tewarie R, Smith TR, Dirven CMF, De Vleeschouwer S, Broekman MLD, Vincent AJPE. Effect of awake craniotomy in glioblastoma in eloquent areas (GLIOMAP): a propensity score-matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):802-817. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00213-3. Epub 2022 May 12.
Gerritsen JKW, Dirven CMF, De Vleeschouwer S, Schucht P, Jungk C, Krieg SM, Nahed BV, Berger MS, Broekman MLD, Vincent AJPE. The PROGRAM study: awake mapping versus asleep mapping versus no mapping for high-grade glioma resections: study protocol for an international multicenter prospective three-arm cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 21;11(7):e047306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047306.
Gerritsen JKW, Klimek M, Dirven CMF, Hoop EO, Wagemakers M, Rutten GJM, Kloet A, Hallaert GG, Vincent AJPE. The SAFE-trial: Safe surgery for glioblastoma multiforme: Awake craniotomy versus surgery under general anesthesia. Study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Jan;88:105876. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105876. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEC-2018-1564
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NL66673.078.18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.