Role of MRI Defecography in Diagnosis of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT03841006
Last Updated: 2020-05-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-05-31
2023-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anorectal Manometery in Pediatric Chronic Refractory Constipation
NCT06543979
The Role of Anorectal Manometry in Pediatric Chronic Refractory Constipation
NCT07291661
Comparative Study Between Surgical and Non Surgical Treatment of Anismus in Patients
NCT00735605
Effects of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment on Fecal Continence and Anorretal Fisiology
NCT03289221
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Combined With or Without Stapled Trans-anal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome
NCT03060330
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Constipation caused by obstructed defecation is of two basic types: functional and mechanical. The functional type includes anismus (pelvic floor dys-synergy), and descending perineal syndrome, whereas the mechanical type includes rectocele, enterocele, internal intussusception and overt rectal prolapse.
All of these conditions represent either a defect of pelvic support or abnormal function of the pelvic floor musculature. The etiology of ODS is controversial. It is presumed that in childbearing women damage to the innervation and soft tissues of the pelvis may occur as a direct consequence of vaginal childbirth. Trauma to the pelvic soft tissues can result in endopelvic fascial and pelvic support defects. Cumulative nerve damage from stretching of pelvic floor due to childbirth and activities that cause chronic and repetitive increases in intra-abdominal pressure such as obesity and chronic cough have been suggested to play a role in the development of symptomatic defects.
Although patients frequently complain of constipation, symptoms such as fruitless straining and incomplete evacuation are rather subjective and unreliable. Nevertheless, an international team of experts included these symptoms in the definition of constipation.This Rome III guidelines, for a patient to be labeled as suffering from functional constipation, which also includes obstructed defecation, following criteria should be present for at least 3 months:
1. Must include two or more of the following:
1. Straining during at least 25% of defecations,
2. Lumpy or hard stools in at least 25% of defecations,
3. Sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25% of defecations,
4. Sensation of ano-rectal obstruction/ blockage for at least 25% of defecations,
5. Manual maneuvers to facilitate at least 25% of defecations (e.g., digital evacuation, support of the pelvic floor),
6. Fewer than three defecations per week.
2. Loose stools are rarely present without the use of laxatives.
3. Insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. The same criteria define dys-synergic defecation as inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor or less than 20% relaxation of basal resting sphincter pressure with adequate propulsive forces during attempted defecation .
On physical examination, the paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor can be assessed by palpation of the puborectalis muscle while the patient is straining . Perineal descent \>3 cm, mucous discharge or mucosal prolapse may also be seen when the patient is asked to strain for stools . However, most clinicians do not rely on palpation and advocate the use of specific tests to diagnose ODS . Electromyography (EMG) of the pelvic floor, the balloon expulsion test (BET), and defecography are the most frequently used tests. Other radiologic methods for the dynamic evaluation of the ODS include magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography, each of which has its advantages and limitations.
The development of fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging sequences provides a new alternative to study all pelvic visceral movements in a dynamic fashion. MR defecography has several important advantages over conventional defecography. Its non-ionic nature, multiplanar capacity, dynamic evaluation and good temporal resolution along with its high-resolution soft-tissue contrast makes it an ideal modality in the assessment of ODS patients. Imaging in the mid-sagittal plane allows evaluation of the anal canal, anorectal angle, levator muscle and hiatus and the vaginal disposition as well as their relationship to a consistent electronically designated pubo-coccygeal Line (PCL). Diagnostic parameters for pelvic dys-synergy include an indented impression of the pubococcygeus muscle on the rectum with excessive obtuse anorectal angulation accompanied by very prolonged rectal emptying on T2-weighted MR images.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient group
symptomatic patient and suspicious to have ODS by history and clinical examination those patient will have MRI defecography
MRI
dynamic MRI pelvis
asymptomatic group
Asymptomatic group not suspicious to have ODS by history or clinical examination they will undergone MRI defecography
MRI
dynamic MRI pelvis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI
dynamic MRI pelvis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* asymptomatic group: will be matched with patients for age and sex.
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alshimaa Abdalkreem
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alshimaa Abdalkreem
Specialist at radiology department Assiut University hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gehan Sayed
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Egypt.Assiut
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AssiutU university hospital
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sakra L, Siller J. [Obstructed defecation syndrome - review article]. Rozhl Chir. 2017 Summer;96(6):247-251. Czech.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MR defecpgraphy in ODS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.