Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
188 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-26
2020-07-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Study Between Surgical and Non Surgical Treatment of Anismus in Patients
NCT00735605
Comparative Study Between Delorme Operation With or Without Postanal Repair in Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse
NCT01656369
Comparison Study of the Effect of Enema in Anal Surgery
NCT05602987
Effects of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment on Fecal Continence and Anorretal Fisiology
NCT03289221
External Anal Sphincter Fatigability
NCT04067453
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
With Chaperone
Female patients examined by male physicians in the presence of a female (nurse) chaperone. The intervention consists of the presence of a female chaperone.
With Chaperone
Female patients examined by male physicians in the presence of a female (nurse) chaperone.
Without Chaperone
Female patients examined by male physicians without a chaperone. The intervention is the absence of a female chaperone.
Without Chaperone
Female patients examined by male physicians without the presence of a female (nurse) chaperone.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
With Chaperone
Female patients examined by male physicians in the presence of a female (nurse) chaperone.
Without Chaperone
Female patients examined by male physicians without the presence of a female (nurse) chaperone.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* first visit to our Coloproctology clinic;
* signed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* refusal of participation.
18 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel C Damin, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gawande A. Naked. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 18;353(7):645-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058120. No abstract available.
Stagno SJ, Forster H, Belinson J. Medical and osteopathic boards' positions on chaperones during gynecologic examinations. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep;94(3):352-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00301-4.
Ehrenthal DB, Farber NJ, Collier VU, Aboff BM. Chaperone use by residents during pelvic, breast, testicular, and rectal exams. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Aug;15(8):573-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.10006.x.
Conway S, Harvey I. Use and offering of chaperones by general practitioners: postal questionnaire survey in Norfolk. BMJ. 2005 Jan 29;330(7485):235-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38320.472986.8F. Epub 2004 Dec 16. No abstract available.
Whitford DL, Karim M, Thompson G. Attitudes of patients towards the use of chaperones in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 May;51(466):381-3.
Teague R, Newton D, Fairley CK, Hocking J, Pitts M, Bradshaw C, Chen M. The differing views of male and female patients toward chaperones for genital examinations in a sexual health setting. Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Dec;34(12):1004-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3180ca8f3a.
Damin DC, Contu PC, Savaris RF, Biazi B. Women's preferences regarding the use of chaperones during proctological examinations conducted by male physicians: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan 2;40(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04796-4.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-0597
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.