Veterans Achieving Weight Loss and Optimizing Resilience-Using Protein

NCT ID: NCT03835416

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-12

Study Completion Date

2024-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Diabetes is a major health concern in obese older Veterans, especially in those who are African American. The negative impact of diabetes on muscle and physical function contributes to metabolic as well as physical decline and is under-studied. This randomized controlled trial compares a higher-protein, weight loss regimen previously shown to improve physical function to an Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) protein intervention in obese older male Veterans with pre-diabetes and functional limitations. Equal numbers of white and black male Veterans will be studied, filling gaps in the investigators' knowledge of differential responses by race as well as obesity interventions for men in general. The primary outcome is functional performance by Short Physical Performance Battery and secondary measures include muscle quantity and composition, glucose handling, lean body mass, recent falls and fear of falling, and quality of life measured at 0, 3 and 6 months. The goal of this research is to accelerate functional recovery and enhance independence in obese male Veterans, which is strongly aligned with the VA mission to "maximize the physical and social autonomy of Veterans".

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study examines an evidence-based obesity intervention as a means of reducing the impact of prediabetes on muscle function in obese older men of white and black race. A total of 64 obese (BMI 30 kg/m2) male Veterans aged 55 + yrs, with mild to moderate functional impairments (Short Physical Performance Battery score of 4 to 11 units) and prediabetes, will be randomized to a higher-protein weight loss treatment (HP-WL) or an RDA-level protein control weight loss treatment (C-WL). All participants receive individualized calorie prescriptions calculated to achieve a weight loss of \~1-2 pounds per week and attend weekly group support sessions designed to enhance diet compliance with goal setting, self-monitoring, stress management, and daily diet journaling. They will also attend a weekly low impact, chair exercise class. HP-WL participants are provided a supply of chilled/frozen high-quality protein foods (lean meats, low fat dairy products) sufficient to give 30 g high quality protein for two of three meals daily to help assure diet compliance. C-WL participants are provided 1 serving per day of high quality protein to avoid unintentional bias. Treatment responses will be compared for the primary outcome of functional performance by Short Physical Performance Battery and important secondary measures, including muscle quantity and composition, glucose handling, lean body mass, recent falls and fear of falling, and quality of life at 0, 3 and 6 months. An exploratory aim examines potential mediators of racial differences in treatment responses and documents the most successful intervention strategies. This randomized controlled trial of a balanced, higher-protein diet during a metabolic challenge (caloric restriction) in those with prediabetes also considers racial differences in responses of obese older men to this regimen. Study findings will fulfill the RR\&D mission by advancing interventions to improve physical function in older Veterans, yield novel information about the impact of balanced, higher protein on muscle and glucose handling, and explore racial differences in responses to obesity interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prediabetes Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-armed Randomized Controlled Trial. Control group follows RDA-level (0.8 g/kg bw/d)protein weight loss diet. Protein follows higher protein (1.4 g/kg bw/d) weight loss diet with balanced protein at each meal.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Those responsible for outcomes assessment will be blinded from group treatment arm to every extent possible.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

WL-Control

0.8 g protein per kg body weight. Seven servings of whey protein powder (15 g/serving) per week will be provided to participants to support diet affordability.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Foods rich in high quality protein

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Along with a weight reduction diet (by instruction), participants will receive high quality protein foods provided to them to include in their daily diet (see study arm description).

WL-Protein

\>30 g of high quality protein per meal, 1.4 g protein/kg body weight/day. 21 servings of high quality (30 g/serving) protein (lean meats, whey protein powder, protein drinks) provided to participants each week to increase compliance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Foods rich in high quality protein

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Along with a weight reduction diet (by instruction), participants will receive high quality protein foods provided to them to include in their daily diet (see study arm description).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Foods rich in high quality protein

Along with a weight reduction diet (by instruction), participants will receive high quality protein foods provided to them to include in their daily diet (see study arm description).

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male Veterans
* African American or Caucasian
* Obese (BMI \> 30 kg/m2)
* Age 55+ years
* Pre-diabetes (confirmed fasting plasma glucose 100 and \<126 mg/dL) or HbA1c 5.7-6.4%
* Short Physical Performance Battery score of 4 to 11 units
* Age-normal renal function
* English speaking
* Able to record dietary intake or has a proxy who can record dietary intake
* Willing and able to be randomized to either intervention group

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of unstable or symptomatic life-threatening illness
* Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) less than 45 mL/min

* A GFR of 45-59 requires bi-monthly testing per the investigators' established algorithm
* Those with a GFR \<45 mL/min are excluded
* Mini Cog score of \<3

--Vegetarian
* Neurological conditions causing functional impairments, including:

* Parkinson's Disease
* multiple sclerosis
* permanent disability due to stroke
* Inability to complete physical function assessment
* History of significant weight instability
* Contraindicated medications, including narcotic mail-outs and active substance abuse
* Any psychiatric condition that would prevent the subject from participating in a group intervention setting, including diagnosed personality disorders
* Primary care provider disapproves participation
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Connie W Bales, PhD RD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E2843-R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.