Functional Implication of Corpus Callosum in Voluntary Strength in COPD Patients

NCT ID: NCT03807258

Last Updated: 2020-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-20

Study Completion Date

2019-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with COPD have lower capability of activating their muscles. At the cortical level, force production is not only controlled by contralateral primary motor cortex but also by ipsilateral motor cortex. The aim of this study is to determine whether ipsilateral areas are functionally impaired in COPD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exhibit not only respiratory symptoms but also a peripheral muscular weakness. This weakness is characterized by a loss in strength, harmful for the patients' life quality and vital prognosis (Swallow et al., 2007). Even if many studies have enlightened damages at a peripheral level, the muscular atrophy itself cannot totally explain the loss in force (Menon et al., 2012). Furthermore, the contractile properties of COPD muscles fibres are preserved (Debigare et al., 2003). Consequently, peripheral muscle weakness cannot only be explained by peripheral factors and central structures must be investigated.

At the central level, it is admitted that force production is controlled by the activation of contralateral motor areas. In COPD, these areas were found to be less activated than in controls during force production (Alexandre et al., 2014). However, recent studies bring the evidence that ipsilateral motor areas are also mobilized to cope demand during such task. The activation of ipsilateral areas is possible through inter hemispheric pathways, as the corpus callosum. Recently, the integrity of the corpus callosum have been linked to the capability of activating the ipsilateral motor cortex (Chiou et al., 2014) during force production. This is of concern knowing that several studies reported white matter lesions in the brain of COPD patients (Dodd et al, 2012) and more precisely in regions containing the corpus callosum (Lahousse et al., 2013).

Therefore, we hypothesize that COPD patients have a lower capability of activating their ipsilateral motor cortex during force production compared to controls.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neurophysiology Physiology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

COPD Patients vs. Controls
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COPD patients group

COPD patients undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evaluations.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluations by TMS

Controls group

Healthy matched controls undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evaluations.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluations by TMS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Evaluations by TMS

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Health insurance
* Patients : COPD Gold II-IV

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Seizures
* Unable to give written consent
* Metalic object above shoulders
* Dermatological issue concerning surface electrodes
* Caffeine consumption \> 4 coffee / day
* Neurological disorders
* Opioid-based treatment
* Patients : recent exacerbation (\< 4 weeks)
* Patients : rehabilitation in previous 1 year
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

5 Santé

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas Oliver, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

5 Santé

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cliniques du Souffle

Lodève, Herault, France

Site Status

Cliniques du Souffle

Osséja, Pyrenees Orientales, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5S_PHYCOM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.