Dual Ovarian Stimulation (DUOSTIM) for Poor Ovarian Responders
NCT ID: NCT03803228
Last Updated: 2022-12-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-03
2021-11-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DUOSTIM and AI: is There a Difference Between Oocyte Performance in the Follicular and Luteal Phases?
NCT06799598
Immediate Versus Postponed Single Blastocyst Transfer in Programmed or Stimulated Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer
NCT06304792
Double Stimulation in Women With Low Prognosis in ART
NCT04531644
Impact of Uterine Immune Profiling and Personalized Treatments in Patients Receiving a Single Blastocyst: a Matched Controlled Study
NCT06503952
Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Using Conventional Timing Versus Timing by Endometrial Receptivity Analysis
NCT03558399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the present time, there is no validated intervention that would bring a significant interest on the number of oocytes obtained in the group of bad responder patients. However, it is a very heterogeneous population whose definition has been proposed only recently, the Bologna criteria and questioned by a new proposal from the Poseidon group. The latter is more focused on the prognosis of success, differentiating patients with a diminished reserve (count of antral follicles CFA \<5 and / or AMH \<1.2 ng / ml) from those with an "unexpected" bad response. As the profiles are better defined, it is easier to determine the impact of a strategy in a specific group.
Recent clarifications on the ovarian cycle and folliculogenesis have shown that several waves of follicular development coexist on the same cycle and that it is perfectly possible to obtain a follicular development with a luteal phase equivalent oocyte quality, compared to conventional stimulations performed in the follicular phase. The main constraint of luteal phase stimulation is the lack of possibility of fresh transfer due to non-synchronization with the endometrium. This constraint is today secondary given the evolution of conservation techniques with the development of embryonic and oocyte vitrification.
On the other hand, there is a differential dependence of FSH follicles, their sensitivity depending on the number of FSH receptors and their duration of exposure to FSH. During ovarian stimulation, all the follicles grow under the action of FSH, only the selected follicles and with the faster growth are taken. However during this stimulation, other smaller follicles are also recruited and sensitized, which may increase the selection of follicles available on the follicular wave following. In patients with weak reserve this potentiation has a great interest, and the sequence of 2 stimulations on the same cycle could make it possible to obtain a larger number of oocytes and embryos, thus giving a better chance of delivery than on 2 distinct cycles of stimulation. However, this is preliminary data that needs to be confirmed with a randomized controlled trial. In this population of poor prognosis, the use of FSH-associated LH activity may optimize the ovarian response to stimulation, particularly the combination containing placental HCG (Fertistartkit®) that obtaining a slightly higher number of oocytes than highly purified HMG (Menopur®).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DUOSTIM
(stim 1) flexible antagonist protocol with pre-treatment with estrogen (S1 between J1 and J8 under E2) and stimulation with Fertistartkit® 300 IU / d; triggering by rHCG (Ovitrelle®250μg) and puncture at 36h; oocyte freezing; (stim 2) resumption of stimulation only by Fertistratkit® 300 IU / day from the day after the puncture; introduction of Progestan® 7 days later to avoid menstruation during the second puncture; triggering with rHCG and second puncture at 36h associated with the devitrification of stim 1 oocytes, with sperm collection and embryonic vitrification. Transfer of frozen embryos to the subsequent cycle in the natural cycle (without HCG) and until the frozen embryos are exhausted.
DUOSTIM
2 consecutive stimulations by Fertistartkit® on the same cycle
Conventional stimuli
(stim 1) flexible antagonist protocol with pre-treatment with estrogen (S1 between J1 and J8 under E2) and stimulation with Fertistartkit® 300 IU / d; triggering by rHCG (Ovitrelle®250μg) and puncture at 36h; fresh embryonic transfer if satisfactory endometrial conditions with luteal phase support by vaginal micronized progesterone Progestan® 600 mg / d; otherwise embryonic freezing and transfer of frozen embryos to the subsequent cycle in the natural cycle until the frozen embryos are exhausted.
(stim 2) ditto starting on the next cycle if possible or the next one. Hormonal Controls + Ultrasound During Stimulation: Blocking / S1 - S5 / S6 - S8 / S9 - SHCG / SHCG-1
Conventional stimuli
2 stimulations by Fertistartkit® performed on 2 different cycles
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DUOSTIM
2 consecutive stimulations by Fertistartkit® on the same cycle
Conventional stimuli
2 stimulations by Fertistartkit® performed on 2 different cycles
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CFA \<5 and / or AMH \<1, 2 ng / ml
* 19 ≤ BMI ≤ 32
* Supports IVF or ICSI
* If antecedent IVF / ICSI, number of oocytes collected \<4
* Attack rank (puncture with transfer) \<3
* Affiliation to the general social security scheme and benefiting from 100% infertility
Exclusion Criteria
* FSH\> 20 IU / l or CFA \<1
* Puncture rank\> 3
* Azoospermia or cryptozoospermia
* Against indication to ovarian stimulation
* Presence of a cyst of indeterminate etiology, ovarian, uterine or mammary carcinoma, hypothalamic or pituitary tumors
* Hypersensitivity to any of the medicines in the protocol
* Moderate or severe pathology of renal or hepatic function
* Evolutionary thromboembolic accidents
20 Years
41 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Laboratoires Genévrier
INDUSTRY
IBSA Institut Biochimique SA
INDUSTRY
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nathalie MASSIN, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHI Créteil
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Polyclinique Jean Villar
Bruges, , France
CHI Creteil
Créteil, , France
Cabinet Médical Carré Saint Giniez
Marseille, , France
Polyclinique Saint Roch
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Massin N, Abdennebi I, Porcu-Buisson G, Chevalier N, Descat E, Pietin-Vialle C, Goro S, Brussieux M, Pinto M, Pasquier M, Bry-Gauillard H. The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):927-937. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead038.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BISTIM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.