Dual Ovarian Stimulation (DUOSTIM) for Poor Ovarian Responders

NCT ID: NCT03803228

Last Updated: 2022-12-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

88 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-03

Study Completion Date

2021-11-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During ovarian stimulation, all the follicles grow under the action of FSH, only the selected follicles and with the faster growth are taken. However during this stimulation, other smaller follicles are also recruited and sensitized, which may increase the selection of follicles available on the follicular wave following. In patients with weak reserve this potentiation has a great interest, and the sequence of 2 stimulations on the same cycle could make it possible to obtain a larger number of oocytes and embryos, thus giving a better chance of delivery than on 2 distinct cycles of stimulation. However, this is preliminary data that needs to be confirmed with a randomized controlled trial. In this population of poor prognosis, the use of FSH-associated LH activity may optimize the ovarian response to stimulation, particularly the combination containing placental HCG (Fertistartkit®) that obtaining a slightly higher number of oocytes than highly purified HMG (Menopur®).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ovarian stimulation is an essential prerequisite for any in vitro fertilization attempt (IVF) to optimize the chances of delivery per cycle. These depend in the first place on the age of the patients and secondly on the number of oocytes collected. There is a strong correlation between these two factors, the ovarian reserve diminishing with age. In older patients or patients with decreased reserve, however, the number of oocytes collected remains a prognostic factor for the chances of delivery.

At the present time, there is no validated intervention that would bring a significant interest on the number of oocytes obtained in the group of bad responder patients. However, it is a very heterogeneous population whose definition has been proposed only recently, the Bologna criteria and questioned by a new proposal from the Poseidon group. The latter is more focused on the prognosis of success, differentiating patients with a diminished reserve (count of antral follicles CFA \<5 and / or AMH \<1.2 ng / ml) from those with an "unexpected" bad response. As the profiles are better defined, it is easier to determine the impact of a strategy in a specific group.

Recent clarifications on the ovarian cycle and folliculogenesis have shown that several waves of follicular development coexist on the same cycle and that it is perfectly possible to obtain a follicular development with a luteal phase equivalent oocyte quality, compared to conventional stimulations performed in the follicular phase. The main constraint of luteal phase stimulation is the lack of possibility of fresh transfer due to non-synchronization with the endometrium. This constraint is today secondary given the evolution of conservation techniques with the development of embryonic and oocyte vitrification.

On the other hand, there is a differential dependence of FSH follicles, their sensitivity depending on the number of FSH receptors and their duration of exposure to FSH. During ovarian stimulation, all the follicles grow under the action of FSH, only the selected follicles and with the faster growth are taken. However during this stimulation, other smaller follicles are also recruited and sensitized, which may increase the selection of follicles available on the follicular wave following. In patients with weak reserve this potentiation has a great interest, and the sequence of 2 stimulations on the same cycle could make it possible to obtain a larger number of oocytes and embryos, thus giving a better chance of delivery than on 2 distinct cycles of stimulation. However, this is preliminary data that needs to be confirmed with a randomized controlled trial. In this population of poor prognosis, the use of FSH-associated LH activity may optimize the ovarian response to stimulation, particularly the combination containing placental HCG (Fertistartkit®) that obtaining a slightly higher number of oocytes than highly purified HMG (Menopur®).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fertility Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DUOSTIM

(stim 1) flexible antagonist protocol with pre-treatment with estrogen (S1 between J1 and J8 under E2) and stimulation with Fertistartkit® 300 IU / d; triggering by rHCG (Ovitrelle®250μg) and puncture at 36h; oocyte freezing; (stim 2) resumption of stimulation only by Fertistratkit® 300 IU / day from the day after the puncture; introduction of Progestan® 7 days later to avoid menstruation during the second puncture; triggering with rHCG and second puncture at 36h associated with the devitrification of stim 1 oocytes, with sperm collection and embryonic vitrification. Transfer of frozen embryos to the subsequent cycle in the natural cycle (without HCG) and until the frozen embryos are exhausted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DUOSTIM

Intervention Type DRUG

2 consecutive stimulations by Fertistartkit® on the same cycle

Conventional stimuli

(stim 1) flexible antagonist protocol with pre-treatment with estrogen (S1 between J1 and J8 under E2) and stimulation with Fertistartkit® 300 IU / d; triggering by rHCG (Ovitrelle®250μg) and puncture at 36h; fresh embryonic transfer if satisfactory endometrial conditions with luteal phase support by vaginal micronized progesterone Progestan® 600 mg / d; otherwise embryonic freezing and transfer of frozen embryos to the subsequent cycle in the natural cycle until the frozen embryos are exhausted.

(stim 2) ditto starting on the next cycle if possible or the next one. Hormonal Controls + Ultrasound During Stimulation: Blocking / S1 - S5 / S6 - S8 / S9 - SHCG / SHCG-1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional stimuli

Intervention Type DRUG

2 stimulations by Fertistartkit® performed on 2 different cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DUOSTIM

2 consecutive stimulations by Fertistartkit® on the same cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Conventional stimuli

2 stimulations by Fertistartkit® performed on 2 different cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Same monthly cycle Two different menstrual cycles

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women from 20 to 41 years old
* CFA \<5 and / or AMH \<1, 2 ng / ml
* 19 ≤ BMI ≤ 32
* Supports IVF or ICSI
* If antecedent IVF / ICSI, number of oocytes collected \<4
* Attack rank (puncture with transfer) \<3
* Affiliation to the general social security scheme and benefiting from 100% infertility

Exclusion Criteria

* Confirmed ovarian insufficiency (amenorrhea)
* FSH\> 20 IU / l or CFA \<1
* Puncture rank\> 3
* Azoospermia or cryptozoospermia
* Against indication to ovarian stimulation
* Presence of a cyst of indeterminate etiology, ovarian, uterine or mammary carcinoma, hypothalamic or pituitary tumors
* Hypersensitivity to any of the medicines in the protocol
* Moderate or severe pathology of renal or hepatic function
* Evolutionary thromboembolic accidents
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

41 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Laboratoires Genévrier

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

IBSA Institut Biochimique SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nathalie MASSIN, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHI Créteil

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Polyclinique Jean Villar

Bruges, , France

Site Status

CHI Creteil

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Cabinet Médical Carré Saint Giniez

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Saint Roch

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Massin N, Abdennebi I, Porcu-Buisson G, Chevalier N, Descat E, Pietin-Vialle C, Goro S, Brussieux M, Pinto M, Pasquier M, Bry-Gauillard H. The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):927-937. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead038.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36864699 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BISTIM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Retrospective Database Studies
NCT01219296 COMPLETED
ReceptIVFity &amp;amp; Immunology in ART
NCT06709976 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION