3D Ultrasound Uterine Characteristics of Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Treatment
NCT ID: NCT02549235
Last Updated: 2019-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-01
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Uterine Lesions and Their Association to Invitro Fertilization(IVF) or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection(ICSI) Outcome
NCT04939376
The Accuracy of Endometrial Ultrasound to Predict Implantation
NCT03860636
A Study to Assess if Scratching the Lining of the Womb Prior to IVF Treatment Increases the Chances of Pregnancy
NCT01882842
Implantation Prediction by Three Dimensional (3D) Ultrasound in Fresh Embryo Transfers
NCT02817373
Automated 3D (SonoAVC) Versus 2D Ovarian Follicles Assessment in IVF Cycles: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01723267
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There has been a lot of increased interest in the recent years in the prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies (Chan et al 2011; Saravelos et al 2008). This has been further intensified by the introduction of several new classifications for these malformations, including the most recent ESHRE-ESGE classification (Grimbizis et al, 2013).
Most of the clinical interest, and what affects daily clinical practice is the diagnosis and treatment of the septate uterus, which is the commonest anomaly amenable to treatment (Homer and Li, 2000). Since the new ESHRE-ESGE classification, which has introduced a new objective method for diagnosis of this anomaly, by measuring the percentage of fundal indentation and considering to be a septate uterus when it is \>50%.
To our knowledge there have been no prospective studies as yet assessing women undergoing ART in order to demonstrate whether indeed the 3D US morphological characteristics (including the percentage of fundal indentation) are correlated to either clinical pregnancy or clinical miscarriage. Indeed, this is of upmost importance, as for example the decision to operate on a so-called septate uterus should be based on whether it has a true impact on clinical outcomes. This is all the more most topical in the present era of IVF/ICSI, and the new classifications for uterine anomalies, as certain authors have criticized the new ESHRE-ESGE classification as significantly over-diagnosing the septate uterus which risks causing unnecessary interventions (Ludwin et al, 2015). Meanwhile other 3D US morphological characteristics such as characterisation of the subendometrial layers/junctional zone and Cesarean scan niches my also prove to be correlated with clinical outcomes.
AIMS Aim: To determine whether and to what extent different 3D US morphological characteristics of the uterus impact the clinical outcomes of women undergoing IVF/ICSI.
PLAN OF INVESTIGATION Subject recruitment: Women with infertility will be recruited from the Assisted Reproductive Technology Unit of Hammersmith Hospital, London. It is often our routine clinical practice to offer 3D US to patients undergoing treatment and we are anticipating that over 90% of patients undergoing treatment will be willing to have this evaluation as part of their routine treatment.
Study design: Prospective cohort observational study.
Inclusion criteria: Described Elsewhere
Exclusion criteria: Described elswhere
Power calculation: To our knowledge no previous prospective study has been performed within a similar context, therefore a power calculation is not easily applicable. However, given that most recent similar retrospective study comparing arcuate versus normal uteri in women undergoing IVF/ICSI included 161 subjects, we will also aim to collect over 150 subjects.
Procedure: All ultrasound examinations will be performed using the GE Voluson series ultrasound machines, with a standard 3D transvaginal probe (model RIC5-9-D; 6.6 MHz central image frequency). The examination with 3DUS will be identical to the routine 2D examination including an acquisition of a 3D volume which takes a few seconds. The images will be shown instantly to the operator and can be stored digitally onto the hard disc attached to ultrasonography machine for subsequent analysis. For the purpose of homogeneity and to reduce operator bias, no more than three experienced operators will perform all 3DUS examinations.
Outcome measures: Described elsewhere
Data processing and analysis: The researchers will ensure the confidentiality of sensitive data by minimizing the number of personnel who handles subject data. The computer data will be encrypted as required to maximize security. Data processing for statistical analysis will be performed using the Statistical Packages of Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS, Inc). Data will be presented by percentage, mean and standard deviation, median and range where appropriate. Comparisons between groups will be carried out by Student T test for continuous variables, ANOVA for mean value comparisons, Chi-square/Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Stepwise logistic regression analysis may be performed as part of systematic analysis for primary outcomes. P-values of \<0.05 will be considered significant.
Monitoring and interim analysis: As the study is perceived to be safe and poses no additional hazard, a Data Monitoring Committee and interim analysis is not considered necessary. There are no known adverse effects of routine ultrasound. No extra pain or discomfort is associated with the 3D US.
Consent: All subjects will be asked to consent for the performance of 2D/3D US which forms part of routine care in our unit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound
Routine 2D/3D ultrasound assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women whose endometrial cavity can be visualised adequately via US
Exclusion Criteria
* Women whose endometrial cavity cannot be visualised adequately via US, such as large fibroids, adenomyosis, BMI\>35, significant uterine retroflexion/retroversion
* Previous uterine surgery (e.g. septum resection, adhesiolysis)
18 Years
42 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
OTHER
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sotirios Saravelos
Subspecialty Trainee in Reproductive Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IVF Unit, Hammersmith Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):415-29. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn018. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056.
Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):569-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu344. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):665-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Brolmann H, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2032-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jan;73(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00480-x.
Surrey ES, Katz-Jaffe M, Surrey RL, Small AS, Gustofson RL, Schoolcraft WB. Arcuate uterus: is there an impact on in vitro fertilization outcomes after euploid embryo transfer? Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):638-643. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.001. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CT-183/2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.